Level 7 Member
Friday, August 28, 2015, 7:42 AM
[The Body Politics
Dear Mrs. Clinton,
I object to your hyperbolic suggestion, that those who vehemently object to the killing of unborn humans, are as extreme in their thinking as terrorists. If this is your rational, it helps me understand your lack of understanding on so many levels. It makes me see that it is YOU, who's extreme in your thinking. It is YOU, who recently found the need to apologize for your keeping a private email as a public servant. I'm certain the need came to you in a dream, of the recent polls.
It is YOU who believes, there is only ONE person involved in the creation of a child. That alone tells me why you see the act of pro-creation as only a woman's issue? Knowing your husbands history, I can understand why you want women to have sole control, of what would be a trinity in the eyes of most children of God.
I also know your need to claim responsibility in words, in your own mind, is the same as if you had taken action! That may also explain why you believe, just using the word "responsibility" free's you of all accountability!
I have to agree with Marco Rubio, who believes you are a representative of the past. That when I hear what you have to say, it has nothing I would want for my country in it. No new ideas, no innovation, just the same old same old voice of the past. Your beliefs are of yesterday, especailly when it comes to babys being torn apart to be put up for sale! Sorry Hill, but to me, your voice irritates far more then it enlightens. And your high pitched tone, suggests your constant struggle to lift yourself up and over so many dead bodys covered in your lies.
Monday, August 24, 2015, 2:27 PM
[The Body Politics
If you are not with God , who then do you believe will help us as a Country? Will you place all your confidence and trust in another man?
We need to all unite under the word GOD again. Leaving the political powers to draw upon Him as individuals. Not making us pawns of their need for power and privilege .
If we place all our Hope and Trust in God and let Him direct the Country by the instrument of His Will, we will again recognize who we are!. If we place all power for the good of this country in our God, and not by party or pundits, we may again choose to Glorify His need in us, rather than the divisiveness that has ruled this country for far too long.
Country and Family.... Our Only Hope
Tuesday, March 10, 2015, 8:37 AM
[The Body Politics
Sometimes Art, in this case a TV program, gives us a look into our own good conscience.
Thanks to last Sunday's episode of the "Good Wife", I heard my beliefs about politics confirmed. Not that I needed to have that confirmation, but in a way, its nice to see the arugument you have concluded as the premise of your truth, viewed outside your own mind.
The episode oddly enough was a picture into Alicia's (the Good Wife) own mind.
The conflict she was dealing with, was one of good character, and the ideal of the greater good.
The conflict included Alicia's secular beliefs, and her daughters religious ones. And in essence, the fight posed the premise, can man be of good character, and ethical, without a belief in God?
Alicia (the Good Wife) is running for a political office. Her conflict, telling the whole truth and lose the election, or withhold the truth and win! The premise given her is, if she lies she will win, and that would put her in the position of doing good. Or as the premise states, achieving a position to do the greater good!
This belief is what our politics is based on. It includes the Machiavellian principle "The ends justify the means".
Her opponent say's he would rather lose, then lie to win.
We are left with Alicia leaning towards wanting the win!
What does this have to do with the belief in God?
I suppose it depends on who your God is? If your God is Jesus Christ, then your model is TRUTH as your God and your guide. Your's is a God who said He was the TRUTH!
THat Truth His Truth is Absolute. And if you really wish to fight the battle of man's idea of truth, and that of Christ/God, no real Good that lives in God's Eternal Truths, can come from a TRUTH that's corrupted for mans need to serve himself, under the guise of a greater good. That was Judas's argument. That was the temptation of the snake, in Eden.
If you are a follower of Christ's truth, you know what you would choose.
I know what I've chosen.....what would you do?
Tuesday, May 8, 2012, 5:03 PM
[The Body Politics
Yesterday, I had a discussion with a good friend whose in the process of wanting to place her mother in a senior care facility. I refrain from calling it a "home", because its my belief, you cant make a place your home, when ones freedom is taken away.
My friend believes her Mother will be safer there. And when she said that, I immediately thought of what has happened to our Country, since 9/11. Let's face it, we never would have believed we would be safe, for all these years. Yet we were hit in our collective conscienceness with the fact, that we can be vulnerable, to being hit.
So slowly we have allowed, or looked the other way, in order for our feeling safe. We have allowed the TSA to do things to our children and our elderly, that would have put these folks in jail, in a less fear induced society. And although we claim to be a Country founded on religious principles...the right to pursue ones happiness or another term for that...FREEDOM TO BE! We have as of late, been choosing a less free, for a more safe, America.
I digress. As my friend gave me all the reasons why she wanted to put her mother in a safer environment, all I could do is feel, she was making a choice for her mom, that her mom didnt want. Her mother wanted to be Free to be, in her own environment, risky as it may seem to her daughter. And I wondered more, that the person who wanted safety was more my friend.
So what if it comes down to, those of us who trust in the will of God, and those who dont? Who would feel more safe? I know my Soul fears nothing. And that its only the body who fears its demise. Because I am aware of who Christ is within me, I have no fear. I trust that my day and my time, is already written in His book. With that , along with the belief I will live with Him forever, what should I fear?
The only thing that would bother me, is if my choice was taken from me, because of anothers fear. And that seems to be what has become the norm in America. For our own good, the right to smoke was our first collective security issue. Now it will be our health care cost, so that they can restrict what we want to eat. How we travel, has become freedomless! We even need a permit to sell lemonaide. All so we may feel safe.
I just makes me wonder, if all these folks who make our laws to keep us safe, will feel differently, when their children want to put them in a home, late in life, you know, too keep them safe? Wonder if they will perfer FREEDOM, over security then? Or will they be old enough then, to seek their security in something greater than themselves?
Wednesday, February 1, 2012, 6:58 AM
[The Body Politics
I email those who represent me in Congress, regarding the new STOCK ACT Provisioin.
I stated the fact, that Congress always claims that no one is above the law. I asked why the need for a bill to be considered, if those in Congress are supposed to hold themselves to a higher standard of ethical behavior, than those they represent ( Please understand, I dont believe anyone should be exempt from responding to their Highest Good) But all I was asking was why they needed this new act.(act, maybe having more meaning here, than one would think)
This is Senator Schumer's reply (in part) to me:
" Currently, the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 ( a little old to be what they base their jusisdiction on, with the hy-jinks of stock trading tricks today) requires the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Justice Department to investigate and prosecute insider trading cases based on general anti-fraud provisions that apply across the board to all Americans including members of Congress. However, the Stop Trading on Congressional Knowledge (STOCK) Act would reaffirm that ban by expressly prohibiting members of Congress from participating in insider trading."
If I have this right, the STOCK ACT is just a reaffirmation ..that EXPRESSLY PROHIBITS MEMBERS OF CONCRESS FROM PARTICIPATING IN INSIDER TRADING. HUH? I thought the SEC Act of 1934 gave the justice dept the right to investigate and prosecute... it says nothing to Congress as a "do not!"
So where is the idea of a reaffirmmation come into play..when there never was a "do not..it will be seen as a conflict of interest!"
Soooo, all along, only those who may have already done the deed fell under the jurisdition of the Justice Department .I can only suppose this new " affirmation" is to now tell CONGRESS that they now have to play by the same standards as, Martha Stewart! I'm sure she'll be happy to hear that! I sure am!
Senator Schumers continued: "The STOCK Act was recently approved by the Senate Homeland Security and Government Affairs Committee and has been referred to the Senate floor for consideration. I will continue to monitor this bill as it makes its way through the Senate." Sadly he didnt say, he would be leading the charge with his vote!
The good thing is, I got a response, as well as a better understanding. I'm still amazed that a Congress, who rights OUR LAWS need special ACTS as MORAL REMINDERS? One would believe those who love the law, would be ethical enough not to need laws for them to live by? But that comes from my understanding of what a man of CHARACTER MEANS..not all men are equal to that standard.... even though I pray they one day find their way.