This faux war on women, began with President O's Healthcare mandate. The mandate challenged the religious conscience, of many believers. Those who believe life begins at conception. Christians, whose principle belief in Christ, is the sacredness of Him as Life. That belief, makes sacred, every child, including the unborn. A Christian believes, that a human life, belongs first to God, and then to its parents. Which, contray to feminist belief, that includes the mother and the father.
The feminist doctrine, gives sole power to the body of a woman. Not to her soul, or that of the man who helped in giving life to a child. But even less, to the soul of the unborn. The feminist believes more in rights and circumstances, than in that life, being part of the sacred.
This feminist attitude was most visible, when some religious men were called to Congress, to express what they believed was a violation of their religious conscience. The first voices to condem these men, as being out of touch, and non representative, of them, was that of the feminists. They saw these men of God, as not representative of their issue. Why? Because the issue that these men sought was not one of gender, but on of conscience. It was not a matter of contreception. It was that contreception, something these men believe is against their belief of LIFE, was being forced upon them, to employ! What happened to the" rights" of these men, to address thier issue of conscience? Why wasnt their issue, addressed or even understood as valid? Why was it co-opted and misused to make it look as if all "womens rights" were being denied? Were there no women who believed, these men could speak for their beliefs, as being valid?
Its because most liberal feminists are still fighting the same old war. They have yet to see, they have already won! In this case, it was these religious men, and those who they serve, whose beliefs were being violated. I believe these men, never once thought it was a gender issue. Only those liberal feminist made it their A-GENDER! The issue is one of principle. The principle of life, given them by God. And it had nothing to do, with Eve! Immediately, these men were devalued, by the Democratic voices of political feminist fear. Relgious conscience, had to take second place, to a womens sexual needs. And they were now expected to pay for it! I would suggest, the argument came from two different chakras. One was a fight for something greater and more lofty than the gonads of a woman.
This feminist belief, was also confirmed recently, by Ms Hillary Rosen. Apparently, her feminist sensitivities state, that if your not the one who EARNS the MONEY, YOU HAVE LITTLE UNDERSTANDING OF working women? It seems Ms Rosen, believes women live in a vaccum. That they all dont have friends, some who work and some who stay at home, and some that work from home, as well! Proving that there is no one size fits all, when it comes to womens issues.
You see, you either learn from something, and make it better, or in your need for "rights, you adopt the attitude that you first fought against.. Just as many women who disliked men going to "girlie bars". Yet as soon as they got some money and power from working, they went to places like Chipendales! Did they learn anything? Or did they just adopt the very thing they disapproved of?
Ms Rosen, in that statement said in essence, "That the only person of value, is the one getting paid(money) for what they do!"
Not everyone emurged from the feminist movement, without learning its lessons. Many women saw money as a way to their freedom. While there were women who never felt the need to be freed While most women had to go to work, to help support their familys. And if you look deeper, you will see its because of governments need for more money, that changed the family structure, as well as its need to make more money just to survive.
This war on women, is another element created by a government action. Its violation of ones religious conscience, will be one of the defining issues facing us in this next election. It was initiated, soley as a political intrusion. And women will be used to head this charged debate.
Christian women who usually remain silent, will have to speak up for their religious conscience, and the liberty to believe as they believe. They will have to stand up, against this political assault. Christian woman of God, have no problem with men representing them. In fact, they seek the good counsel of men. The difference between a woman of faith, and a liberal feminist is their belief in who gives them life? The Christian women or any woman of faith, believes more in her God, than in her government. She believes all the good she has comes from Him, and not buy the good graces of government laws. Woman of faith believe God is her provider, even if she goes to work every day. She could never dispose of her unborn child. Because she believes in Christ as the source of her LIFE, more than the producer of her circumstances. She sees pregnancy as more than just a bodily function of production. And even if she no longer loves the person with whom she shares his seed. She respects his part of Gods process. A Christian women knows that life, isnt just a matter of unconnected cumstances. That everything that comes into her life, has THE PURPOSE OF TEACHING HER HOW TO LOVE MORE. The Christian woman, accepts THE WILL OF GOD, as Mary did. She accepts it, not because she is ignorant, or because she has no rights to deny it. But because she has learned to love more unselfishly. Therefore, she can accept GOD, AS THE FATHER. For she loves the maleness of her being! And she loves the fact that God designed her, with the honor of bringing forth LIFE. She respects the body that brings forth life, because it is GODS GIFT. She loves more , devotion to LIFE, than power and or money. Becuase it is in her being, that one can continue, GODS LIFE!