Understanding the religion of Atheism and its hidden agenda using the A.C.L.U. for ‘religious purpose’ Here is the result of what we have learned in observation of discussions in a group called United Atheist’s of America “UAA” www.facebook.com/WEAREUAA We have observed in discussions with Atheist’s • That atheist’s deny being a religion even when the Supreme Court has ruled that they are a religion on several occasions. • That atheist’s are unable to define its own identity which is why the Supreme Court needed to do it for them. • The Supreme Court found that any group having a belief on divinity whatsoever is in fact a religion, even if that belief is in a lack of a deity (GOD). (the negative equal to religion) • We must remember that religion is a part of a group’s identity and culture. It can be clearly seen within that Identity or culture by observation. Religion is described as having a philosophy about the nature of our existence. Note that Darwin’s Evolution is the philosophy for the nature of our existence and is the culture which gives identity to the modern atheist. • Mother Nature is the Atheist supernatural form of a deity, which has created all life and Darwin is her profit. • In the discussion with atheist’s it is clearly seen that atheist are very confused about what the word atheist really means for example; on one hand they say it means -----a lack of belief in whether or not God exists-------, and at the same time they also say that it means -----having a belief -------that God does not exist. This endless and pointless argument about their own identity makes atheist reasoning appear underdeveloped as group in general to say the least, because one statement cancels out the other, making a description of the nature of the group impossible to understand even within the group itself. Remember this internal confusion on identity is exactly why the Supreme Court had to take up the case for them in the first place, because the group itself can not express its own beliefs in a clear and mature way that makes sense in any lower court after failing to do so within its very own group. • In a court room facts are used to make decisions. (BTY Darwin’s theory of Evolution can not be proven in a court of Law). Again it is these clear internal contradictions within the group itself which have made the group as whole completely incapable of having a clear description of the group’s identity on what position it takes on divinity and this is what has required the intervention of the Supreme Court to name its identity for them using observation of the facts. Thanks to the Supreme Court, perhaps atheist’s can self evolve a clear understanding of their own identity in the title of atheist and the beliefs within their own culture----of the anti-religious form of religion seen by all of us. • When this self righteous group speaks about religion they speak in the same way that any religion speaks about other religions. In other words, the conversation is a carbon copy of religious hatred of other religions. They self righteously say others are self-righteousness and evil, exposing the hypocritical nature of themselves of in the process by being self-righteous towards others. They will display hate and accuse the other of hatred. They will also say that they hate the other because; the other does not love every one and will prove to be a hypocrite because they themselves do not love everyone. • The decisions (plural) upheld by the Supreme Court to consider atheism a religion may help the group understand as a whole that they have a belief about God, which is a religious statement of faith that states that there is no God. • More over one of the of the most obvious evidences Atheism has evolved into the status of a religion over time, is found in the original definition of the name A-theist in which the letter A stands for Agnostic (Uncertain or undecided about belief in God) and word ‘Theist’ which means the “Belief in a God” (A-theist). The definition of the word A-Theist, should be having no opinion whatsoever (A-agnostic) in a belief of God (theist) However when it is compared to the modern definition, Atheism has a different definition altogether. Today Webster’s defines Atheist as: “one who believes that there is no deity” The key word here is ‘believes’. Which is in fact not a lack of belief, (and is what they claim out of convenience from the old definition of Atheism for deceptive purposes), this added belief has changed the definition into something like Anti-theism; A definition that requires blind faith (the religious kind of faith/belief) in the non existence of a deity. And this newly added atheist belief is not a lack of belief that was traditionally considered Atheism in the past. Also this ‘Faith of knowing the truth’ in the non-existence of God is a deciding factor of evidence in the existence of a religious belief. This new definition (of an Anti-theist who is no longer an Agnostic-theist) should have and has been defined as a religion by the Supreme Court--- because of this lack of opinion about God is no longer present within the group. If you had a lack of belief whatsoever (one way or the other) about the existence of a God---------- would you identify yourself with a group who is constantly involved in endless rants about religion in conversation with you hoping to win over your belief about the subject of God? I know that I would see this group as looking to convert me in the opposite from of religion (anti religion) and I would never take on the identity of this type of culture, I would avoid a pro religious culture just the same. The true old school Atheist no longer exists in modern Atheism they have been pushed out by the new order of Anti-theism. Which is now the overwhelming majority of atheism; this new anti-theism has completely taken over the group, disguising itself as the agnostic old order and original definition! A perfect example of a wolf in a sheep’s clothing. • Clearly Atheists bash a Christians, in the same ways a Christian will bash Atheists in their speech about each other in their own group just visit open discussion on any atheist group web page. It is like a religious web page, they have a need to feel like they belong to a higher purpose in life than merely to exist, and that higher purpose in life to them is much like a religious persons, in that they feel like they need belong to a lager force to rid the world of this evil (religion in this case) and in the name of their cause they will try to force their beliefs on other people just like they say about religion. They too need more than just an individual purpose in life. Today the pot is calling the kettle black and the kettle is calling the pot black! In addition to the Supreme Court; religions are now calling this higher purpose in life for Atheism a religion as well. Nowhere is this seeking of more than individual existence, more evident than within the higher purpose of the A.C.L.U. which supports an atheist religion against religion The A.C.L.U. has a long history of fighting against religion however it also has a long history of fighting for Atheism a known religion, we have to ask why? The answer is that the hidden agenda is to hinder all religion which is not their own. A religious crusade if you will, with the A.C.L.U. army of religious crusaders for the atheist minority in America to force its own belief about deity upon the population. This is a clear contradiction of what they claim to protect which is freedom and civil liberty. • The A.C.L.U. is religion disguised as a protector of freedom, while doing all it can to eliminate religious freedom for any religion other than its own. in order to evade its weapon of legal attack, you must have the same religious higher purpose in life that they have in their own atheist religion to be left out of their fight for so called freedom from religion. The A.C.L.U. has a drive towards its belief that sees all religions other than its own (Atheism) as unsafe driving in the realm of belief. This is a typical religious view of having a higher purpose for any religion. Today this religious crusade of atheism is battled in the courtroom and it also upholds support for the same religious battle in schools on the educational front. They have been very successful in this religious battle being disguised as agnostic, when in fact they are Atheists with hidden religious intentions all along as the wolf in sheep’s clothing. The cat is out of the bag so to speak thanks to the Supreme Court and its eyes being opened to the fact of Atheist having a clear agenda of taking a stand on deity against the majority of the public and trying to force its hidden agenda of its atheist religion on the public in general in the successful attempts to violate religious freedom on every front. No wonder the Supreme Court has ruled atheism a religion. Atheisms own hidden agenda in the A.C.L.U. has become far too evident way too often in its own court room for far too long in history to be ignored. Because the combatants of the A.C.L.U. in this Atheism religious crusade, have become self absorbed in the higher purpose of seeking to be the only religion (Atheism) available to this country (starting with Christianity) which was settled for and founded on religious freedoms. Like most freedom fighters we have seen across the globe in the past they deceptively fight in the name of freedom with a hidden agenda only to become exactly what they have overthrown, as history repeats itself. This boils down to a power play for the take over of who will be in control over the beliefs of people and win the people over to their side with their own beliefs to dominate religious beliefs in America. • Another evidence of this religion which is clearly seen by everyone is in the way this group becomes angry and avoids questions about their evidence or the theory that forms the basis of their religious type of belief. Which BTY is also a very common religious response to criticisms of faith in any religion! If a person gets angry over a question about their belief you have just found that persons religion. The test of a person’s religion is this; if you test a person’s belief and question it and the person gets angry you have just found that person’s religion, you have found the thing that the person thinks is so true, it causes them to get angry if some one does not accept it. In other words, the religious response is seen in the way this group displays the same emotions as any other religious person’s response would be when you question or disagree with that persons own religion. They will eventually deny credibility of the question, without trying to provide a reasonable answer and without the attempt to build a case as to why a person’s faith should exist in the first place. This also exposes a lack of personal maturity in any religion; pro-theist or Anti-Theist. • A religious response is evidence of religion, even if that religious response is one based on the religious denial of a God. • Atheists are clearly seen displaying blind faith with statements that ‘Darwin’s theory of Evolution is a fact’ (something unknown and unproven), without giving example. This is the evidence of typical types of Religious blind faith responses to questions of problems in theory or theology. • Darwin’s theory is the core religion of Atheism which has evolved into the religiously defended (flip side) faith based religious science called evolution. The quick explanation; by a religion about the nature of our Existence in the religious battle to win souls over to their own side in the fight of belief for God, or verses the fight for faith in belief that God does not exist. The religion described by the Supreme Court is the religious belief of the origins of life with; no possibility of intelligent design of life with zero tolerance for any discussion of such a possibility. It is strictly forbidden in the same way religion in the past would have burned someone at the stake for teaching against the religion. In other words this new religion and its members will and do respond the same way religion in the past has responded in regard to the heretic who would dare to speak out against them publicly and will do everything in its power to shut down opposition. Laws have changed since then and so has the power struggles but the long term goal is to win over the souls of children as they move through our educational system and squeeze out the opposition of educators as well. Unfortunately since 1962 this religion in the disguise of not having opinion about god, has become very successful in evolving the majority of the scientific educators and have successfully forced out as much opposition as possible to their religion. So much for keeping religion out of the school, we can forget about that because this religion has already dominated the rule of the educational system long ago. • I personally call the discussion childish because these members of the group are mentally immature in how to make a case for the basis of their belief. This immaturity in knowledge is evident by the way they attempt to make a case to defend their scientific conclusions. The argument usually contains one or all of the following constructs; • A denial of credibility of any kind for the existence of any creditable disagreeable source, (I might add) this is also seen in almost all other religious arguments of faith as well. • Scientific babble, designed to confuse the objections or questions of others in the hope that people will see them as far too smart to communicate with; hoping that others will give in and hide from or submit to their pretense of wisdom. • These constructs usually show up immediately when blind faith in the basic concept of the religion is not enough to overcome the question and when the frustration from the doubt of making any reasonable argument sets in and anger begins because the belief they hold is not being accepted. • I can predict based on the history of religion that this new religion now seen within Atheism will repeat the history of past religions; because history always repeats it’s self and when it does this will be the only proof for evolution that we will know for a fact. We should call it the evolutionary life of a brand new religion; the last religion standing will be decided by the survival of the fittest and having the most ruthless sneaky snake in the grass, wise as a serpent leadership it can find for it’s religion, it will be free from the influence of divine morality that may slow its progress in the multiplication of its numbers in society, it will wipe out any and all other religious resistance, by any means available to promote its own success, and it will evolve into its most ruthless form of religion with a religious belief of ‘God does not exist’ forced on others and it will eventually demand citizens under its control to renounce Christ.