Post Reply
Page 2 of 23  •  Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 23 Next
Switch to Forum Live View Anti-Mormon Bias Unchanged in 45 Years
12 months ago  ::  Jun 22, 2012 - 10:23AM #11
Ironhold
Posts: 9,620

Jun 22, 2012 -- 9:06AM, TemplarS wrote:


Surely there is more to it than that.




Not really.


You see, the "No on 8" crowd launched an absolutely massive disinformation campaign accusing the church of being the driving force behind Proposition 8. The centerpoint of this campaign was a television ad which showed two LDS missionaries entering the house of a lesbian couple, tearing up their marriage certificate, and confiscating their wedding rings.


Because of this, a lot of liberals and gay-rights supporters mistakenly believe that Prop 8 was all on the church, and that the only reason why it passed was because the church used a large sum of money to ram-rod it through.


In reality, the "No" crowd always had the edge in fund-raising. Not only did the "No" crowd raise more money in the first place, they raised more out-of-state money, too. What's more, while most of the in-state "Yes" money came from all over the state, the bulk of the "No" money came from LA and SanFran.


That's right - the "No" types just couldn't deal with the prospect that a coalition had formed against gay marriage (it's my understanding that at least one African-American organization actually launched the effort) and that the majority of California citizens were in favor of 8, so in response they just lied through their teeth about the matter.


Yeah.

Moderated by Stardove on Jun 22, 2012 - 01:48PM
Quick Reply
Cancel
12 months ago  ::  Jun 22, 2012 - 10:28AM #12
Ironhold
Posts: 9,620

Jun 22, 2012 -- 1:42AM, Ebon wrote:

Well, then, I apologise on behalf of my country. I know there's a fair few Mormons around here (partly because they often have incredibly polite people witnessing in the mall) but I've never heard any particular bias against them. I stand by the opinion that if a religion doesn't involve breaking any laws, it's none of anyone else's business.




Thank you.


But you see, bigotry and bias aren't always so overt.


For example, the church building I go to is on a dead-end road.


Most people who look at it would see "bad urban planning".


In reality, the city council realized that the couldn't stop the church from being built, so they halted funding to finish road construction in that area. The logic was that if they couldn't keep us from coming in, they could make it as inconvenient and miserable for us as possible.

Quick Reply
Cancel
12 months ago  ::  Jun 22, 2012 - 11:05AM #13
mindis1
Posts: 6,061

Jun 21, 2012 -- 5:51PM, TemplarS wrote:

Some really interesting things in here:

religion.blogs.cnn.com/2012/06/21/bias-a...

Bias against a Mormon presidential candidate hasn’t budged in 45 years, with 18% of Americans saying they would not vote for a well-qualified candidate who happened to be Mormon, according to a Gallup Poll released Thursday.


Gallup first asked Americans about support for a Mormon presidential candidate in 1967 when Romney’s father, George Romney, was running for president. That year, 17% of Americans said they would not vote for a well-qualified Mormon for president.


“The stability of resistance to a Mormon presidential candidate over the past 45 years is an anomaly,” Gallup editor-in-chief Frank Newport wrote in a survey report, noting that “resistance to a candidate who is black, a woman, or Jewish has declined substantially over the same period of time.”

Most surprising: unlike many other aspects of bigotry- this one seems stronger among Democrats and independents:


Bias against a Mormon candidate is significantly higher among Democrats and independents than among Republicans, Gallup found.


Twenty-four percent of Democrats and 18% of independents said they would not vote for a well-qualified Mormon who was nominated by their party, while 10% of Republicans expressed such opposition.



I would venture that Democrats’ bias against a Mormon Presidential candidate might have something to do with some of the dubious beliefs that seem to be part and parcel of the Mormon faith. Frankly, all I know about Mormonism is what I’ve learned from “South Park”--and I suspect that I am not so different from most Democrats in this. To my mind, the story begins to fall apart when Joseph Smith claimed to have found some gold tablets buried in the woods.

Quick Reply
Cancel
12 months ago  ::  Jun 22, 2012 - 11:07AM #14
mindis1
Posts: 6,061

Jun 22, 2012 -- 10:23AM, Ironhold wrote:


. . . a lot of liberals and gay-rights supporters mistakenly believe that Prop 8 was all on the church, and that the only reason why it passed was because the church used a large sum of money to ram-rod it through.



I take it that you can’t substantiate what you claim that “a lot of liberals and gay-rights supporters mistakenly believe”.

Quick Reply
Cancel
12 months ago  ::  Jun 22, 2012 - 11:10AM #15
mecdukebec
Posts: 13,284

Jun 22, 2012 -- 11:05AM, mindis1 wrote:


Jun 21, 2012 -- 5:51PM, TemplarS wrote:

Some really interesting things in here:

religion.blogs.cnn.com/2012/06/21/bias-a...

Bias against a Mormon presidential candidate hasn’t budged in 45 years, with 18% of Americans saying they would not vote for a well-qualified candidate who happened to be Mormon, according to a Gallup Poll released Thursday.


Gallup first asked Americans about support for a Mormon presidential candidate in 1967 when Romney’s father, George Romney, was running for president. That year, 17% of Americans said they would not vote for a well-qualified Mormon for president.


“The stability of resistance to a Mormon presidential candidate over the past 45 years is an anomaly,” Gallup editor-in-chief Frank Newport wrote in a survey report, noting that “resistance to a candidate who is black, a woman, or Jewish has declined substantially over the same period of time.”

Most surprising: unlike many other aspects of bigotry- this one seems stronger among Democrats and independents:


Bias against a Mormon candidate is significantly higher among Democrats and independents than among Republicans, Gallup found.


Twenty-four percent of Democrats and 18% of independents said they would not vote for a well-qualified Mormon who was nominated by their party, while 10% of Republicans expressed such opposition.



I would venture that Democrats’ bias against a Mormon Presidential candidate might have something to do with some of the dubious beliefs that seem to be part and parcel of the Mormon faith. Frankly, all I know about Mormonism is what I’ve learned from “South Park”--and I suspect that I am not so different from most Democrats in this. To my mind, the story begins to fall apart when Joseph Smith claimed to have found some gold tablets buried in the woods.





Mormons also worship two gods with physical bodies, God and Jesus Christ; Jesus is the product of a union with the goddess, who is Heavenly Father's wife.  Only Holy Ghost is non-physical.


If that sounds like classical paganism, i.e. worshiping gods and goddesses, "Bingo."

*******

"Wesley told the early Methodists to gain all they could and save all they could so that they could give all they could. It means that I consider my money to belong to God and I see myself as one of the hungry people who needs to get fed with God’s money. If I really have put all my trust in Jesus Christ as savior and Lord, then nothing I have is really my own anymore."
Quick Reply
Cancel
12 months ago  ::  Jun 22, 2012 - 11:22AM #16
mytmouse57
Posts: 9,316

Jun 21, 2012 -- 8:39PM, Erey wrote:


liberal opposition to mormonism has risen in recently.  Which is too bad because I think mormons are as a group pretty good people.  I don't plan to vote for Romney but that is no reason to disparage mormons




I lived in the heart of Mormon country for years. Southern Idaho, just a couple of hours away from Salt Lake City.


I found Mormons to be pleasant and easy to get along with. 


Quick Reply
Cancel
12 months ago  ::  Jun 22, 2012 - 12:25PM #17
Erey
Posts: 15,105

Jun 22, 2012 -- 11:05AM, mindis1 wrote:


Jun 21, 2012 -- 5:51PM, TemplarS wrote:

Some really interesting things in here:

religion.blogs.cnn.com/2012/06/21/bias-a...

Bias against a Mormon presidential candidate hasn’t budged in 45 years, with 18% of Americans saying they would not vote for a well-qualified candidate who happened to be Mormon, according to a Gallup Poll released Thursday.


Gallup first asked Americans about support for a Mormon presidential candidate in 1967 when Romney’s father, George Romney, was running for president. That year, 17% of Americans said they would not vote for a well-qualified Mormon for president.


“The stability of resistance to a Mormon presidential candidate over the past 45 years is an anomaly,” Gallup editor-in-chief Frank Newport wrote in a survey report, noting that “resistance to a candidate who is black, a woman, or Jewish has declined substantially over the same period of time.”

Most surprising: unlike many other aspects of bigotry- this one seems stronger among Democrats and independents:


Bias against a Mormon candidate is significantly higher among Democrats and independents than among Republicans, Gallup found.


Twenty-four percent of Democrats and 18% of independents said they would not vote for a well-qualified Mormon who was nominated by their party, while 10% of Republicans expressed such opposition.



I would venture that Democrats’ bias against a Mormon Presidential candidate might have something to do with some of the dubious beliefs that seem to be part and parcel of the Mormon faith. Frankly, all I know about Mormonism is what I’ve learned from “South Park”--and I suspect that I am not so different from most Democrats in this. To my mind, the story begins to fall apart when Joseph Smith claimed to have found some gold tablets buried in the woods.





The only thing that is really crazy seeming about Mormonism is the time aspect . We have no problem respecting Muslims and they believe back in the 3rd century Mohammad rode a winged creature to heaven or the Catholics who believe Mary was taken whole bodied up to heaven to avoid experiencing death.  These events are slated to happen so long ago and in far away exotic places.  counter that with Mormons who claim it happened only like 100 years ago and in Missouri. 


Would liberals tolerate anyone who disparaged or voted against a muslim candidate?  Hell no.  But they will against a Mormon, which of course I find just shamefull

Quick Reply
Cancel
12 months ago  ::  Jun 22, 2012 - 12:50PM #18
wohali
Posts: 10,090

A candidates religion doesn't make one whit of difference to me.


Their stance on issues does.


I also don't really care about gender, hair color, how many kids they may have or what TV shows they like.


It's their stance on issues.


 

Quick Reply
Cancel
12 months ago  ::  Jun 22, 2012 - 12:59PM #19
mytmouse57
Posts: 9,316

Jun 22, 2012 -- 12:50PM, wohali wrote:


A candidates religion doesn't make one whit of difference to me.


Their stance on issues does.


I also don't really care about gender, hair color, how many kids they may have or what TV shows they like.


It's their stance on issues.


 




Dear Lord! Don't you know there's no room for rational thought in American politics?

Quick Reply
Cancel
12 months ago  ::  Jun 22, 2012 - 1:27PM #20
BDboy
Posts: 3,266

Jun 22, 2012 -- 12:50AM, Ironhold wrote:


As someone who is Mormon?


America should be ashamed of itself.


Europe and Canada, too.


A lot of the popular anti-Mormon arguments floating around right now are decades, if not centuries obsolete, but they're still floating around anyway because too many people - including rank-and-file Christians - would rather bury their heads in the sand than admit they were being bigotted and ignorant towards another group of people.



>>>>>>>>>> Wow. I know some folks did not agree with Mormons but did not know they were so violent.


 


Jun 22, 2012 -- 12:50AM, Ironhold wrote:


In fact, the region I live in is so openly hostile towards Mormons that "having people threaten to shoot you" is an occupational hazard for the LDS missionaries who operate here.


Making matters worse, a lot of media outlets and pundits are choosing to fan the flames rather than calm the waters. For example, a month or so back ABC News accused Romney of funneling untold millions of dollars in cash and stock to the church as if it was some sort of illegal back-room deal; in reality, what happened was that Romney chose to tithe on his salary while at Bain Capital. Can you imagine what would happen if a major news broadcaster made such an argument about a Catholic or a Baptist?


Yeah.


It's just that bad, and there's not one single excuse that can justify it.




 


>>>>>>> I kinda agree with you. If Romney had a different church the media would have been "Kinder" to him.


I remember how Obama was questioned by "Conservatives". Albeit he was a church going Christian. I am sure the mormon issue just warming up.


Edit: quote

Moderated by Stardove on Jun 22, 2012 - 01:51PM
Quick Reply
Cancel
Page 2 of 23  •  Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 23 Next
 
    Viewing this thread :: 0 registered and 1 guest
    No registered users viewing
    Advertisement

    Beliefnet On Facebook