| 12 months ago :: Jun 13, 2012 - 4:24PM #201 | |
And nobody's stopping them from exercising that right. If they decide to pay more for a second serving that's their choice. It is using the law of supply and demand. It is an exercise in personal liberty. Bloomberg isn't trying to stop people for consuming as much of anything that they want, except maybe for pot. Nonetheless, I think the manufacturer has a moral obligation to produce a product that is safe to eat and doesn't have unnecessary additives that are dangerous to one's health. I understand that you disagree, that you think all responsibility lies with the buyer, not the manufacturer.
And nobody is violating that right.
Knowing what's in it and understanding the consequences of what's in it are two different things. Fortunately for us, it was public health activists that managed to force manufacturers to put labels on their processed foods, so that we can know what's in it. Not so with what you get at most restaurants. Doesn't seem to me to be too much to ask businesses to serve reasonable sized servings of fatty foods and sugary drinks instead of taking advantage of human beings' weaknesses for their bottom line. Nobody is interfering with anybody' right to consume too mauch crap if they want to.
Neither I nor Mayor Bloomberg has even tried to have a say in how or how much a person eats or drinks. Nobody is talking about "banning" or "limiting" anybody
Yep, that's exactly what I've been saying all along. It's their right to do that, if they so desire. *** |
|
|
Quick Reply
|
|
| 12 months ago :: Jun 13, 2012 - 4:34PM #202 | |
Maybe it depends on where one lives. Just about EVERYWHERE I go provides free refills, and the glasses they use are BIG. You can't get a "small" meaning 8 or 12 ounces where I live. Believe me or don't.
Because that is not how human beings behave and it doesn't make them stupid or lazy or anything else but human. If it were all as easy as you all make it sound, nobody in America would be overweight and nobody would have obesity-related illnesses early in life. Plus, as I've already said, I am neither a Republican nor Libertarian, so I am not into the blame game when it comes to the public health. I accept that human beings aren't perfect and make mistakes. Maybe you don't know any obese people or people with diabetes or heart disease to point the finger of blame at for their suffering. I do.
Please don't tell me what I think. Otherwise I'll have to conclude you base your rebuttals on hysteria like somebody else I know. I've wasted quite a bit of time, effort and digital space telling you all what I think. That you disagree does not concern me. Mischaracterization of what somebody else says based on some polictical dogma someone adheres to is thread-derailing. |
|
|
Quick Reply
|
|
| 12 months ago :: Jun 13, 2012 - 4:46PM #203 | |
"No matter how dark the moment, love and hope are always possible." George Chakiris
“For those who believe, no proof is necessary. For those who don't believe, no proof is possible.” Stuart Chase |
|
|
Quick Reply
|
|
| 12 months ago :: Jun 13, 2012 - 4:53PM #204 | |
|
More mischaracterizations and misrepresentations....and personal insults instead of legitimate rebuttals to legitimate challenges.
You've been out of control on this thread for a long time, now, Erey. I do regret that you just don't get it. However, you are wasting your time and my time with your insults and your repeated mischaracterizations and misrepresentations of what I say and what I believe. So don't waste more of your time responding anymore, unless you have a need to, because you and I are done, here. It is rather puzzling that you could become so enraged with both fists clenched and flaying any which way because other people don't see the world in the harsh, punative way you do, all over something that doesn't even affect you !! ps...I haven't called people "stupid"....I DON'T call people "stupid"...those are YOUR words, not mine...oh, and GirlChristian's words. Own them. Your "mean girl" routines are amusing. |
|
|
Quick Reply
|
|
| 12 months ago :: Jun 13, 2012 - 5:09PM #205 | |
I realize your response is directed at Erey, but I have to say something about this statement. This does affect all of us...perhaps not directly, but indirectly. It creates a precedent that says it's okay for the government to decide what businesses are and are not allowed to sell to consumers, regardless of whether it's a true and immediate health risk. It makes sense to say you can't sell me cyanide or lead paint, but sugary drinks do not fall into that category. Having a 32 ounce soda is not dangerous, nor will it cause obesity or diabetes. Having a 32 ounce soda every day might be another story, but having one on occassion would do no harm to anyone without existing health problems. So, this becomes an issue of unnecessary government control, and if people don't speak up about that, it will continue to spiral down that path.
Our need to learn should always outweigh our need to be right
Useless Knowledge: Allodoxaphobia - Fear of opinions |
|
|
Quick Reply
|
|
| 12 months ago :: Jun 13, 2012 - 5:15PM #206 | |
Maybe in your experience. I am willing to accord you enough respect to acknowledge that what you say is true in your own experience. I would HOPE that you could return that respect by acknowledging that what I relate from my own experience is true, and that you are in no position to summarily tell me my experience is wrong. There are a lot of places where the waiter/waitress is so busy that they don't stop to ask, they just bring a second, or third glass.
Yes, businesses that are going to sell a product to a human being who can be harmed has a moral obligaton to make sure the product is as safe as it can be. I don't believe in predatory capitalism. You do. That's why I'm a Green and you're a Republican. The consumer's "responisiblity" is secondary in this case. A kid should have an equal right to trust that the stuff he's being sold is safe. That's not too much to ask.
Diabetes, heart disease and cancer all run in my family and killed family members. I would never , in a million years, blame them for their suffering. Period.
I haven't made any excuses. It is your side -- what I'll call the "mean girl" side that is making excuses -- for inanimate businesses instead of people. Your side is the one full of blame and full or scorn, it's your side that uses words like "stupid people".. You said it...own it. I'm regret that you, Cesmom and Erey just don't get it. No where have I said that there are "foods and drinks" that I "think they shouldn't" sell. Nowhere. I have not called for a ban anywhere. If you are going to tell me I'm wrong, and tell me what I think, the least you can do it GET IT RIGHT! |
|
|
Quick Reply
|
|
| 12 months ago :: Jun 13, 2012 - 5:16PM #207 | |
"No matter how dark the moment, love and hope are always possible." George Chakiris
“For those who believe, no proof is necessary. For those who don't believe, no proof is possible.” Stuart Chase |
|
|
Quick Reply
|
|
| 12 months ago :: Jun 13, 2012 - 5:22PM #208 | |
"No matter how dark the moment, love and hope are always possible." George Chakiris
“For those who believe, no proof is necessary. For those who don't believe, no proof is possible.” Stuart Chase |
|
|
Quick Reply
|
|
| 12 months ago :: Jun 13, 2012 - 5:28PM #209 | |
If you put public health before private profit, how would that create a precedent "regardless of whether it's a true and immediate health risk"??? Please spell this out to me. And to rabello, if she's still around... Why is "government" such a big bogeyman that you'd rather sell your health than take sensible measures to promote self-control? (Yes, self-control! Because, mind you, the people wanting cheap maxi softdrinks can still exert their freedom to choose by buying the stuff in the next supermarket... if they don't, then maybe their choice wasn't as free as the market apologists say it is, right?)
tl;dr
|
|
|
Quick Reply
|
|
| 12 months ago :: Jun 13, 2012 - 5:29PM #210 | |
What, exactly, is the "gov't control" you fear so much from having businesses in NYC limited to serving 16 ounce servings in one transaction? If a business serves more than the 16 ounces, they'll get fined, just like they'd get fined if they allow a smoker to smoke in the restaurant, and that's only if they got reported. Did you know that the Republican governor in Florida is scrubbing the voter rolls to disenfranchise minority voters from this coming election? Did you know that the governor of Texas has executed more people in 7 years than any other governor in American history? THAT'S the kind of "gov't control" you should fear. I don't understand people who choose to live here and yet hate the American government. Move to Haiti if you can't stand government. There's no social security, or medicare, or medicaid or food stamps or welfare, but there's no "gov't control" either. |
|
|
Quick Reply
|
|