| 1 year ago :: Jun 01, 2012 - 1:42AM #1 | |
|
news.yahoo.com/york-mayor-bloomberg-prop... It adds new meaning to a "Coke Bust"
For those who have faith, no explanation is neccessary.
For those who have no faith, no explanation is possible. St. Thomas Aquinas If one turns his ear from hearing the Law, even his prayer is an abomination. Proverbs 28:9 |
|
|
Quick Reply
|
|
| 1 year ago :: Jun 01, 2012 - 2:17AM #2 | |
|
And that strikes me as entirely pointless. I'd support warning labels (giving the customer more information) but outright bans seem both pointless and micromanaging.
He who oppresses the poor shows contempt for their Maker, but whoever is kind to the needy honors God. ~ Proverbs 14:31
Fiat justitia, ruat caelum
|
|
|
Quick Reply
|
|
| 1 year ago :: Jun 01, 2012 - 6:24AM #3 | |
It is a very anti-capitalist, anti-individualist, and in that sense anti-American measure. It presumes that individuals are too stupid to know what's best for them, and allow themselves to be lured into self-hurting behaviour by merely getting the best value for money deal. Of course, the more educated among us know that individuals aren't rational, and that markets develop their own dysfunctional dynamics, and that public health is a public good that can require sanctions on individuals. But then, all this makes us anti-American. Bloomberg obviously has become a communist.
tl;dr
|
|
|
Quick Reply
|
|
| 1 year ago :: Jun 01, 2012 - 8:29AM #4 | |
|
Ken over at Popehat labels this as the Tyranny of Doing Something, which pretty much sums up a lot of legislature in this country.
|
|
|
Quick Reply
|
|
| 1 year ago :: Jun 01, 2012 - 10:23AM #5 | |
|
Because there is a real and present danger with the massive consumption of these massive drinks, I would recommend a warning message on the container, as we've done with cigarettes. However, I would not support Bloomberg's proposed law, although that's a decision NYC will make one way or the other. |
|
|
Quick Reply
|
|
| 1 year ago :: Jun 01, 2012 - 10:46AM #6 | |
Warning labels is another way of pretending to "do something". I doubt anybody ever stopped smoking because of the warning label. There are many things that are just as destructive of these drinks. Maybe we should accept the fact that people are going to act stupid. ( Which is itself, a matter of opinion) |
|
|
Quick Reply
|
|
| 1 year ago :: Jun 01, 2012 - 10:06PM #7 | |
|
www.npr.org/blogs/thetwo-way/2012/06/01/... I've got a Mad Magazine sense of humor: So what's next? Pizza? Hamburgers? Hot Dogs? Doughnuts?
For those who have faith, no explanation is neccessary.
For those who have no faith, no explanation is possible. St. Thomas Aquinas If one turns his ear from hearing the Law, even his prayer is an abomination. Proverbs 28:9 |
|
|
Quick Reply
|
|
| 1 year ago :: Jun 01, 2012 - 11:49PM #8 | |
|
When I was a kid, "bottomless" (meaning unlimited free refills) 32 oz soft drinks in a glass didn't exist, and a soda pop was a treat. We didn't need "Big Gulps" then; why do people, today, need them except for the fact that they're "there". What is becoming more and more clear is that processed sugar really isn't good for people, and a 32 oz glass of soda isn't good for people, either. Plus there is an obesity epidemic and type 2 diabetes epidemic among American teens...so the communist mayor has some rational reasons for proposing what he's proposing. Not much different from prohibiting restaurants and bars from allowing smoking on their premises. Nobody needs to drink 3 cans of Coke (or lemonade, or Hawaiin Punch) with a meal. |
|
|
Quick Reply
|
|
| 1 year ago :: Jun 02, 2012 - 12:05AM #9 | |
|
Look, New York City has LONG been called, "The Big Apple" -- NOT "The Super-Size Fries" or "The Big Gulp Sugar Soda" or "The Half-Pounder-with-Cheese" -- for a REASON ... Obviously NYC is -- or longs to be -- THE Healthiest City in The World, right ... ??? |
|
|
Quick Reply
|
|
| 1 year ago :: Jun 02, 2012 - 12:07AM #10 | |
|
Apparently ... they ... just ... want ... Bill Clinton ... to ... GO AWAY ...
|
|
|
Quick Reply
|
|