| 13 months ago :: May 28, 2012 - 6:38PM #41 | |
|
|
|
Quick Reply
|
|
| 13 months ago :: May 28, 2012 - 6:40PM #42 | |
|
|
|
Quick Reply
|
|
| 13 months ago :: May 28, 2012 - 6:42PM #43 | |
Maybe we can talk on once the USA have jumped on the bandwagon and the first glamour is gone.
tl;dr
|
|
|
Quick Reply
|
|
| 13 months ago :: May 28, 2012 - 6:50PM #44 | |
|
Marriage is not a Human right , it IS a CIVIL right and carries with it other CIVIL rights, such as familial tax breaks, familial protection, creating two people as one family unit. Only a radical or someone making a poor word choice would call marriage a human right. In Germany at least it was 25 years ago, Legal marriage was state function and on US bases a Chaplain could only perform a rite of marriage if the couple had already had a civil marriage.
“I seldom make the mistake of arguing with people for whose opinions I have no respect.” Edward Gibbon
|
|
|
Quick Reply
|
|
| 13 months ago :: May 28, 2012 - 8:33PM #45 | |
|
Human right, civil right - what's the difference? |
|
|
Quick Reply
|
|
| 13 months ago :: May 28, 2012 - 8:58PM #46 | |
What then is a human right?
A tyrant must put on the appearance of uncommon devotion to religion. Subjects are less apprehensive of illegal treatment from a ruler whom they consider god-fearing and pious. On the other hand, they do less easily move against him, believing that he has the gods on his side. Aristotle
Never discourage anyone...who continually makes progress, no matter how slow. Plato.. "A life is not important except in the impact it has on other lives" Jackie Robinson |
|
|
Quick Reply
|
|
| 13 months ago :: May 29, 2012 - 12:58AM #47 | |
There is a difference. One is rights which are universal and accorded through the simple fact of being human. The other are rights accorded by a particular society to citizens of that society. In practice though, the distinction is only of interest to philosophers and legal theorists. Incidently, Article 12 of the European Convention on Human Rights (which the UK are signatories to and functions as our Bill of Rights) does classify marriage as a human right. So far, it's an undecided legal question whether that includes same-sex marriage but since Cameron (our PM) is, in possibly his only excuse for existing, committed to extending marriage to same-sex couples, it makes little difference (currently, UK same-sex couples have Domestic Partnerships but the law classifies them as marriage in every respect but the very technical).
He who oppresses the poor shows contempt for their Maker, but whoever is kind to the needy honors God. ~ Proverbs 14:31
Fiat justitia, ruat caelum
|
|
|
Quick Reply
|
|
| 13 months ago :: May 29, 2012 - 3:41AM #48 | |
In the USA, we have the individual gun ownership issue as a civil right. It is not a human right because it is not part of any international rights treaty or declaration. Easy to spot, the difference, isn't it? By that token, marriage indeed is a human right (part of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights), with the clearly stated purpose of mandating governments to protect the family as "fundamental unit" of society.
tl;dr
|
|
|
Quick Reply
|
|
| 13 months ago :: May 29, 2012 - 3:49AM #49 | |
Do you have anything else to add besides your usual hatred of marriage?
The dwarves of yore made mighty spells,
While hammers fell like ringing bells In places deep, where dark things sleep, In hollow halls beneath the fells. For ancient king and elvish lord There many a gloaming golden hoard They shaped and wrought, and light they caught To hide in gems on hilt of sword. - J.R.R. Tolkien |
|
|
Quick Reply
|
|
| 13 months ago :: May 29, 2012 - 4:05AM #50 | |
tl;dr
|
|
|
Quick Reply
|
|