Post Reply
Page 1 of 4  •  1 2 3 4 Next
Switch to Forum Live View A bi-racial population?
1 year ago  ::  May 22, 2012 - 12:39AM #1
solfeggio
Posts: 7,695
According to the latest figures from the U.S. Census Bureau, a little more than 50% of the children younger than one year in the United States are classified as non-white.  And in at least five states, including Hawaii, the District of Columbia, California, New Mexico, and Texas, whites are in the minority.

www.census.gov/newsroom/releases/archive...

www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-18108845

The minority groups include black, Hispanic, Asian, and mixed-race people.  A growing proportion of Americans will be biracial.

The largest minority group is Hispanics, of which there were 52 million in the U.S. last year.  This was followed by about 44 million African-Americans.

Unfortunately, in response to the growing non-white population, there is also a rise in hate groups.

abcnews.go.com/US/militias-hate-groups-g...       

   
Quick Reply
Cancel
1 year ago  ::  May 22, 2012 - 9:23AM #2
Nepenthe
Posts: 2,206

A bi-racial population?


 


No, we are all still the human race. 

Gary Johnson 2012
Quick Reply
Cancel
1 year ago  ::  May 22, 2012 - 9:51AM #3
TemplarS
Posts: 5,169

Not really anything new, but a milestone of sorts.


But there are some points to be made concerning the statistics. Which, BTW, are a bit muddled, since they are presented in a way which mix racial (black,white) and non-racial (Hispanic) categories, and actually include a category (Asian) which is a catchall for several races and many unrelated ethnic groups. 


The "mixed race" or bi-racial segment especially bears comment.  The notes sate: "Unless otherwise specified, the statistics refer to the population who reported a race alone or in combination with one or more races".   This is non-rigorous as far as the statistics are concerned.  As I understand it, someone who is, say,  3/4 white and 1/4 Hispanic, and reported themselves as white-Hispanic, would be counted as Hispanic.  So the statistics are a bit slanted towards over-counting minorities.


But looking forward, a converse point can be made is about mixed marriage (there was another study a while back reporting on the rapid increase in this).  Mixed marriages are increasingly common among Hispanics and Asians.  So we should expect the bi-racial population to expand even more rapidly going forward.   And this is a good thing; this sort of immigration/assimilation has been going on forever in the US, is probably one source of our vitality as a nation, and is certainly nothing to be feared; except, as noted, by the fear-mongers; but this is nothing new either; go back a hundred years and substitute the  words "Irish" or "Jew" for "Hispanic" and you will see that little has changed.


But these trends seem not to apply to African-Americans, who ironically have been here the longest. Their percentage of the population is not growing; black-white mixed marriages are not  common.   Notably, our most famous African-American is not descended from an African-Americans but from an African immigrant.  Unlike what I see as regards other minorities, there seems to be something unhealthy at work here.  Lingering racism plays a role, but surely, in the age of Obama, there is more going on.  Until and unless something changes, I worry that African-Americans  are going to fail to fully share in this new multi-racial nation; as will, BTW, as always, our Native Americans.

Quick Reply
Cancel
1 year ago  ::  May 22, 2012 - 9:54AM #4
vra
Posts: 5,763

In decades to come, we as anthropologists tend to believe the States and many other countries will become more like Brazil where the mixing of races has taken place faster than in most other locations.  Here it has taken more time, mostly caused by the inherited British attitude that the races should not intermarry, along with demographic differences. 


As time has gone on, these barriers have been declining.  I was born in the 1940's, and in the 1950's interracial marriages were prohibited in many states and strongly discouraged in the others.  Even though there are still some latent effects from that, this is gradually changing. 

Quick Reply
Cancel
1 year ago  ::  May 22, 2012 - 10:47AM #5
mytmouse57
Posts: 9,316

Good.


We need more diversity. 

Quick Reply
Cancel
1 year ago  ::  May 22, 2012 - 10:50AM #6
Erey
Posts: 15,105

I was chatting with my vietnamese next door neighboor yesterday and he was talking about how he had just finished a book where the professor predicted at some point in the future the humans will be so intermixed that there will be no more usefull racial categories. 



Personally I do think the reports of interracial people is probably a bit overstated.  There is certainly plenty of interracial people but sometimes it is an overstatement.  For instance Hispanic is not a race, it is an ethnicity.  I have met hispanics with a germanic last name and appearance but becasue their parents immigrated to Venuzuela or Mexico they get to denote themselves as hispanic.  You can be afro-hispanic, asian-hispanic, etc.  I have known people that like to say they are biracial because they had a Cherokee great-grandmother. 

Quick Reply
Cancel
1 year ago  ::  May 22, 2012 - 11:04AM #7
teilhard
Posts: 42,711

Yes ...


"Race" is a SOCIAL Construct -- not a Biological Reality ...


My (adopted) Son's "Birth Mother" is Vietnamese and his "Birth Father" is "African-American" ... So ... of what "Race" IS he ... ???


When he was little, on the Census Form I made my OWN entry under his "Race" Category: "Human" ...


May 22, 2012 -- 9:23AM, Nepenthe wrote:


A bi-racial population?


No, we are all still the human race. 





Quick Reply
Cancel
1 year ago  ::  May 22, 2012 - 11:51AM #8
mytmouse57
Posts: 9,316

May 22, 2012 -- 11:04AM, teilhard wrote:


Yes ...


"Race" is a SOCIAL Construct -- not a Biological Reality ...


My (adopted) Son's "Birth Mother" is Vietnamese and his "Birth Father" is "African-American" ... So ... of what "Race" IS he ... ???


When he was little, on the Census Form I made my OWN entry under his "Race" Category: "Human" ...


May 22, 2012 -- 9:23AM, Nepenthe wrote:


A bi-racial population?


No, we are all still the human race. 








I agree. "Race" is a conctruct, with no basis in objective reality. 

Quick Reply
Cancel
1 year ago  ::  May 22, 2012 - 12:57PM #9
TemplarS
Posts: 5,169

May 22, 2012 -- 11:51AM, mytmouse57 wrote:


May 22, 2012 -- 11:04AM, teilhard wrote:


Yes ...


"Race" is a SOCIAL Construct -- not a Biological Reality ...


My (adopted) Son's "Birth Mother" is Vietnamese and his "Birth Father" is "African-American" ... So ... of what "Race" IS he ... ???


When he was little, on the Census Form I made my OWN entry under his "Race" Category: "Human" ...


May 22, 2012 -- 9:23AM, Nepenthe wrote:


A bi-racial population?


No, we are all still the human race. 








I agree. "Race" is a conctruct, with no basis in objective reality. 






All true.


But this does not alter the point, which is that America is changing.  As it has always changed.  Some people have always opposed the changes, there were anti-immigration political factions in the 1800s as there are now, there were anti-Catholic factions and anti-Jewish factions as there are now anti-Islamic factions.  But those groups, as with the new Americans today, enriched the country.  Those groups assimilated, but maintained enough of their identity that we can now all celebrate St. Patricks Day, or Chinese New Year,  and put German Christmas trees and statues of Dutch St. Nicolas in our houses in December.  Why not add Cinco de Mayo to the mix?


Except the blacks and the native Americans, who keep ending up at the bottom of the heap.


 

Quick Reply
Cancel
1 year ago  ::  May 22, 2012 - 2:01PM #10
Roodog
Posts: 9,740

I believe that this country, like most other multi-ethnic countries before it, such as the former USSR and Yugoslavia, will eventually be partitioned into separate nations. Such partitions can go smoothly (like the former Czechoslovakia) or it can be bloody rough (like the former Yugoslavia).


My point of view is that the various ethnic groups in this country would get a far better deal from our current Federal Government than with trying to start from scratch or joining up with another country like Canada or Mexico.

For those who have faith, no explanation is neccessary.
For those who have no faith, no explanation is possible.

St. Thomas Aquinas

If one turns his ear from hearing the Law, even his prayer is an abomination. Proverbs 28:9
Quick Reply
Cancel
Page 1 of 4  •  1 2 3 4 Next
 
    Viewing this thread :: 0 registered and 1 guest
    No registered users viewing
    Advertisement

    Beliefnet On Facebook