| 1 year ago :: May 23, 2012 - 2:34PM #31 | |
|
Actually, NCG, detection equipment just permits observations. Our failures at observation can also fail us in observing the output of detection equipment. Equipment lets us detect things that are beyond our normal human capabilities. E.G. electron microscopes. But the process of observation is the same. You end up with data one way or the other and that can be analyzed. Equipment makes it easier to dectect and share the observations, but the process still relies on more than one person observing and reporting for its reliability. It's in the analysis, reasoned or not, where the problems are. |
|
|
Quick Reply
|
|
| 1 year ago :: May 23, 2012 - 3:00PM #32 | |
I do stand corrected - human senses come into play in observing testing equipment output. In my little world, getting those test reports from calibrated standards plays a big role in taking the guess-work out. The field of data analysis is the where opinions run free. I have strong opinions - but acknowledge my naive status in this field. I am hands-on with specifications, levels of detection, and test reports. But only a fan - not even an amateur - at sophisticated data analysis. My opinions are from reading Phil of Sci - papers, not from actual statisical analysis programming and data mining. I respect those folks, but the analysis is only as good as the models they use for parsing. |
|
|
Quick Reply
|
|
| 1 year ago :: May 23, 2012 - 5:58PM #33 | |
|
"'Philosophy' ... is a walk on The Slippery Rocks ..." -- Edie Brickell, in "What I Am" ... |
|
|
Quick Reply
|
|
| 13 months ago :: May 27, 2012 - 2:31PM #34 | |
|
Vacation picture for all binary logicians. The snowy peaks of the Holy Mount Athos from the beach of small village Stagira, where Aristotle was born. More trivial information about the site: www.stagira.gr/site.php?&file=informatio... |
|
|
Quick Reply
|
|
