Post Reply
Page 2 of 20  •  Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 20 Next
Switch to Forum Live View Rush Limbaugh Calls Student Denied Spot At Contraception Hearing A ‘Slut’
3 years ago  ::  Mar 01, 2012 - 2:59PM #11
mountain_man
Posts: 40,578

Mar 1, 2012 -- 2:17PM, Ken wrote:

Well, Andrew Breitbart is dead in all directions.


I feel sad for his family. They had to put up with his lies. Why can't guys like this realize that if they have to lie to support their cause then maybe the cause isn't worth supporting?

Dave - Just a Man in the Mountains.

I am a Humanist. I believe in a rational philosophy of life, informed by science, inspired by art, and motivated by a desire to do good for its own sake and not by an expectation of a reward or fear of punishment in an afterlife.
Quick Reply
Cancel
3 years ago  ::  Mar 01, 2012 - 3:37PM #12
Girlchristian
Posts: 11,699

Mar 1, 2012 -- 2:43PM, Roodog wrote:


I wonder if the man is suffering from some manner of mental degeneration.


He is getting progressively outrageous as the years go by.




"Outrageous" sells whether it's Limbaugh, the Kardashians, Jersey Shore, Simon Cowell on American Idol, etc...

"No matter how dark the moment, love and hope are always possible." George Chakiris

“For those who believe, no proof is necessary. For those who don't believe, no proof is possible.” Stuart Chase
Quick Reply
Cancel
3 years ago  ::  Mar 01, 2012 - 3:41PM #13
rabello
Posts: 22,230

He also said that he thinks she and the rest of the Feminazis that expect Americans to pay them for having sex should pay these Americans back by providing videos of it.


I'd bet there are at least a few Repubs who'd watch.

Black Lives Matter
Quick Reply
Cancel
3 years ago  ::  Mar 01, 2012 - 3:42PM #14
mytmouse57
Posts: 9,782

Mar 1, 2012 -- 3:37PM, Girlchristian wrote:


Mar 1, 2012 -- 2:43PM, Roodog wrote:


I wonder if the man is suffering from some manner of mental degeneration.


He is getting progressively outrageous as the years go by.




"Outrageous" sells whether it's Limbaugh, the Kardashians, Jersey Shore, Simon Cowell on American Idol, etc...




Pretty much.

Quick Reply
Cancel
3 years ago  ::  Mar 01, 2012 - 3:58PM #15
TPaine
Posts: 9,488

Limbaugh doubled down on his sexist comments comments yesterday about Sandra Fluke on his show today by saying that if women use insurance-covered birth control they should have to post sex tapes on line.

"So Miss Fluke, and the rest of you Feminazis, here’s the deal. If we are going to pay for your contraceptives, and thus pay for you to have sex. We want something for it. We want you post the videos online so we can all watch." Link


IMO, it's not surprising that the Drugster (as Ed Schultz calls him) would enjoy that. He could take some Viagra, settle down in a comfortable chair, and actually pretend he is a real man for awhile. Since he is in his fourth marriage since 1977 one can assume that his wives have not been overly thrilled by his performance.

"The right of voting for representatives is the primary right by which other rights are protected. To take away this right is to reduce a man to slavery, for slavery consists in being subject to the will of another, and he that has not a vote in the election of representatives is in this case." Thomas Paine:
Dissertation on First Principles of Government (July 1795)
Quick Reply
Cancel
3 years ago  ::  Mar 01, 2012 - 4:11PM #16
TemplarS
Posts: 6,961

Mar 1, 2012 -- 3:37PM, Girlchristian wrote:


"Outrageous" sells whether it's Limbaugh, the Kardashians, Jersey Shore, Simon Cowell on American Idol, etc...





There's a difference.


The Kardashians are useless, the Jersey Shore people are stupid, Simon Cowell is abrasive.  But none of them pretend to be more than they are.  They do  not pretend they have anything serious to say on public policy; their useless or stupid or abrasive opinions relate to clothes and bars and music, not to serious questions about the way the nation ought to be run.


In short, they may be irritating, but they are not dangerous in the least.

Quick Reply
Cancel
3 years ago  ::  Mar 01, 2012 - 4:18PM #17
Girlchristian
Posts: 11,699

Mar 1, 2012 -- 3:41PM, rabello wrote:


He also said that he thinks she and the rest of the Feminazis that expect Americans to pay them for having sex should pay these Americans back by providing videos of it.


I'd bet there are at least a few Repubs who'd watch.





There are a few Democrats, Independents, and Libertarians who'd watch too....

"No matter how dark the moment, love and hope are always possible." George Chakiris

“For those who believe, no proof is necessary. For those who don't believe, no proof is possible.” Stuart Chase
Quick Reply
Cancel
3 years ago  ::  Mar 01, 2012 - 4:19PM #18
Girlchristian
Posts: 11,699

Mar 1, 2012 -- 4:11PM, TemplarS wrote:


Mar 1, 2012 -- 3:37PM, Girlchristian wrote:


"Outrageous" sells whether it's Limbaugh, the Kardashians, Jersey Shore, Simon Cowell on American Idol, etc...





There's a difference.


The Kardashians are useless, the Jersey Shore people are stupid, Simon Cowell is abrasive.  But none of them pretend to be more than they are.  They do  not pretend they have anything serious to say on public policy; their useless or stupid or abrasive opinions relate to clothes and bars and music, not to serious questions about the way the nation ought to be run.


In short, they may be irritating, but they are not dangerous in the least.





I don't see Limbaugh as dangerous.

"No matter how dark the moment, love and hope are always possible." George Chakiris

“For those who believe, no proof is necessary. For those who don't believe, no proof is possible.” Stuart Chase
Quick Reply
Cancel
3 years ago  ::  Mar 01, 2012 - 4:30PM #19
TemplarS
Posts: 6,961

He isn't to you and me.


But people listen to him, and nod their heads at what he says, and he is going to either influence their opinions towards a more extreme view, or make them more likely to act on these extreme opinions, either in their daily lives or at the ballot box.  I consider that dangerous.

Quick Reply
Cancel
3 years ago  ::  Mar 01, 2012 - 4:36PM #20
Erey
Posts: 19,423

Personally,


I don't like the slut language or the hint at promiscuity being at the base of any of this.  That kind of banter is a big turn off to me.



However, I do think Rush has a point, why should tax payers be asked to subsidize someone's sex life?  If you have a sex life shouldn't you pay your own way? 


I know there are reasons why we want to pay for everyone's birth control, I guess because there is no excuse not to use it if you are not ready for children.  But I still think on the other hand if you are having sex you should cover your own expenses associated with that.   I can certainly see both sides.  I do tend to at the heart of things feel like people should pay for their own birth control. 

Quick Reply
Cancel
Page 2 of 20  •  Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 20 Next
 
    Viewing this thread :: 0 registered and 1 guest
    No registered users viewing
    Advertisement

    Beliefnet On Facebook