| 2 years ago :: Nov 09, 2011 - 8:53PM #21 | |
+1 love
Good works will never produce faith, but faith will always produce good works. loveontheair
|
|
|
Quick Reply
|
|
| 2 years ago :: Nov 09, 2011 - 9:13PM #22 | |
Well, I think that some people clearly did not fulfill their obligations. Getting to the bottom of who was involved in what discussions, leading to exactly what decisions, in any organization is a slippery thing. Nobody puts these things in writing, and it is always hard to pin anything or anybody down down (unless you have someone like Nixon, who conveniently recorded it all). All that is known is that that there were two gentlemen who talked to Paterno and the grad assistant, and they evidently informed the University president after the fact. But while Paterno informed the AD the day after he heard the allegations- all this other maneuvering went on over a period of weeks; who knows what other discussions took place over that time? And, incredibly, from the timeline I have seen the AD didn't even talk to the grad assistant about what he had seen until a week and a half after Paterno told him. Inexcusable, but very suspicious as well. |
|
|
Quick Reply
|
|
| 2 years ago :: Nov 09, 2011 - 9:19PM #23 | |
|
Let's be really clear here-- "AD" means ATHLETIC Department--not anything associated with a District Attorney as some might mistakenly think...... Paterno went to the ATHLETIC department and NOT to the police--and never checked to see what was being done about sexual abuse that was going on in his OWN department. And in case people don't understand that--Sandusky the accused perp was an assistant coach to Paterno. IE Joe was the abuser's boss.
|
|
|
Quick Reply
|
|
| 2 years ago :: Nov 09, 2011 - 9:53PM #24 | |
|
University policy does not trump the law of the land anymore than do the regulations of the church of Rome. One who has knowledge of the commission of a crime maintains a responsibility to report it to properly constituted authority. What we seem to be seeing here is misprision of a felony on the part of several university officials. |
|
|
Quick Reply
|
|
| 2 years ago :: Nov 09, 2011 - 10:00PM #25 | |
So, what responsibility does the student that actually witnessed the crime have? THAT's who should have called the police as that person is the one that actually witnessed the crime.
"No matter how dark the moment, love and hope are always possible." George Chakiris
“For those who believe, no proof is necessary. For those who don't believe, no proof is possible.” Stuart Chase |
|
|
Quick Reply
|
|
| 2 years ago :: Nov 09, 2011 - 10:14PM #26 | |
|
I can't quarrel with that, but his failure to pursue it further does not absolve those in the administration who had reason to know. |
|
|
Quick Reply
|
|
| 2 years ago :: Nov 09, 2011 - 10:16PM #27 | |
|
Could someone tell me why a college football coach earns $1million+ salary? What does a lecturer at Penn State earn?
The world has its priorities all wrong. |
|
|
Quick Reply
|
|
| 2 years ago :: Nov 09, 2011 - 10:49PM #28 | |
Actually Coach Paterno earned a bit over $500,000, probably well within scope. My daughter made over $300,000 as a research analyst for the building industry in California before the bank scams. She earned it.
|
|
|
Quick Reply
|
|
| 2 years ago :: Nov 09, 2011 - 10:54PM #29 | |
|
Just watched the Penn State spokesman on Lawrence O'Donnel's "Last Word". Penn State admin is scapegoating Coach Paterno for the university's malfeasance. Let the investigation go forward into that malfeasance. Big money, big contracts, yada,yada. Big business, including television, will have the last laugh. Who will corral them?
|
|
|
Quick Reply
|
|
| 2 years ago :: Nov 09, 2011 - 10:57PM #30 | |
|
Jane--did you see my question in post #8 for you? It is not a rhetorical question. |
|
|
Quick Reply
|
|