Aug 11, 2011 -- 1:42PM, browbeaten wrote:

Aug 10, 2011 -- 8:01PM, REteach wrote:

Aug 10, 2011 -- 5:42PM, browbeaten wrote:

So, its Islamaphobic to be against Shariah Law?  .

.

?????

Aug 14, 2011 -- 7:30PM, BDboy wrote:

Any group of people in the US can follow a stricter code than the US law as long as they are not breaking any US laws.  Shall we force the Amish to use zippers?  Make Catholics eat meat on Friday?  Force Baptists to drink alcohol just because it is legal?

Rolls eyes. 

Apparently, you are unaware of what consists of "following" Shariah Law?

.

 

Aug 14, 2011 -- 7:30PM, BDboy wrote:

>>>>>>>> Apparently, Muslims (Who cares and knows about Sharia law) are NOT asking for Sharia law in the US. Only people who are talking about this "Law" are those who have NO clue what "Sharia law" stands for!!

It is a non-issue....

What is not clear is the reason that most Muslims living in the US are not asking for Sharia Law in the US. 

I think the reason that most Muslims living in the US are not openly advocating for Sharia Law in the US is because they are currently a minority population who are at best 10% of the population.  

What is not clear is wether or not if Muslims would replace the US Constitution if and when they become the 51% of the population.   

What is clear is the US Constitution was not written by Muslims. 

What is clear is the the Sharia was written by Muslims.   

What is clear is that they are not the same.  

What is not clear is wether the US Constitution is a better or worse set of laws than the Sharia.