Aug 12, 2011 -- 3:04PM, browbeaten wrote:

We're  not necessarily talking about pushing Shariah Law on ALL Americans,  we're talking about allowing Shariah Law to merge its way into local  Muslim communities, etc.  When certain "practices" become a mainstay,  voters have a greater tendency to vote them into everyday practice.  Religious  practice, of any kind, must remain personal and "outside" of civil  discourse.

So what are you doing to repeal laws based in Christianity?

Howdy

Aug 12, 2011 -- 6:50PM, REteach wrote:

Aug 12, 2011 -- 4:10PM, NATAS wrote:

 According to Islam, ethics cannot be secular; it must be rooted in the Being of God, and in belief in Him. It is belief in God from which all knowledge and all virtues follow as corollaries. Belief in God is really a belief in the moral order, and the objectivity of the moral values. Secular morality based on expediency can have no roots in reality. Islamic ethics is based on the belief that all intrinsic values which make the moral order flow from Islam. Morals cannot be broadbased unless they are motivated by firmness of faith. Religion provides the standard for the assessment and judgment of moral values. In the absence of religion, morals are bound to wither in a value-destroying cosmos.

Aug 12, 2011 -- 6:50PM, REteach wrote:

How is this different from Christianity?  Especially the more conservative aspects of it.  Pat Robertson and Fred Phelps as examples.  Or the doofuses cited in the OP.  

There is no Christian Sharia.   But if there was I would be opposed to it.  

Both Judiaism and Islam have religious "laws".  

 

Just because it is not called Sharia does not mean it does not exist. Or that some Christians don't want it to exist.  The reason the founding fathers erected a wall between church and state was because they personally saw the effects of Sharia, Christian style. 

Aug 12, 2011 -- 4:32PM, Tpaine wrote:

Aug 12, 2011 -- 1:01PM, Roodog wrote:

Aug 12, 2011 -- 11:44AM, Tpaine wrote:

The Southern Poverty Law Center states that eight central activists; Brigitte Gabriel, Pamels Geller, David Horowitz, Steve Emerson, Daniel Pipes, Frank Gaffney, Robert Spencer, David Yerushalmi are behind every aspect of the recent surge of anti-Islamic fervor in America. Link

They also have some of my friends on their hate list too.

All my friends did was to say this country is going to hell for the political, religious and social evils that prevail here.

Do your friends believe that there are people who don't deserve civil liberties based on their age, disability, gender, ethnicity, race, nationality, religion, or sexual orientation? What is the reason the SPLC gives for their presence on the list? If your friends can prove that they were listed based on false information, the SPLC will remove them.

They are a Christian video company. They make films about Bible prophecy, UFO's and Conspiracies, have for well over 30 years. They are better known for calling mainstream evangelicalism bullsh*t.  Many churches think they're heretical.

Aug 12, 2011 -- 11:44AM, Tpaine wrote:

The Southern Poverty Law Center states that eight central activists; Brigitte Gabriel, Pamels Geller, David Horowitz, Steve Emerson, Daniel Pipes, Frank Gaffney, Robert Spencer, David Yerushalmi are behind every aspect of the recent surge of anti-Islamic fervor in America. Link

>>>>>>>> I have listened to most of these people. These are people who preach hate against Islam and try their best to scare American people who may not understand Islam very well.

Most of these "Activists" are part of the group who made the case for attacking Iraq and now working hard to make Iran the next target!!

The nutjob from Norway (Brevic) mentioned some of these "Activists" in his insane "Manifesto".

For more info, click on the link below.

www.islamophobia-watch.com/