Mar 1, 2009 -- 11:14PM, Bodean wrote:

Mar 1, 2009 -- 11:26AM, catboxer wrote:

That's because Obama's side is the side of patience, pragmatism, tolerance, and openness to experimentation and new ideas, while your side is the side of right-wing Republican reactionism.

Where??  What??

Tax the Rich? ... Nope!  Socialized Medicine? Nope! Spending out of recession?  NOPE!  Appointing partisan lacky's??  NOPE! ... for that matter .. even the notion of "changing Washington" ..... NOPE!

 

Where are those new ideas??

Another example of why the Grand Old Party of Rush is out of step with Americans.  They are so caught up in their distorted free-market indoctrination that they have been rendered incapable of generating pragmatic policies.

Mar 3, 2009 -- 10:42AM, Kwinters wrote:

Mar 1, 2009 -- 11:14PM, Bodean wrote:

Mar 1, 2009 -- 11:26AM, catboxer wrote:

That's because Obama's side is the side of patience, pragmatism, tolerance, and openness to experimentation and new ideas, while your side is the side of right-wing Republican reactionism.

Where??  What??

Tax the Rich? ... Nope!  Socialized Medicine? Nope! Spending out of recession?  NOPE!  Appointing partisan lacky's??  NOPE! ... for that matter .. even the notion of "changing Washington" ..... NOPE!

 

Where are those new ideas??

 

Another example of why the Grand Old Party of Rush is out of step with Americans.  They are so caught up in their distorted free-market indoctrination that they have been rendered incapable of generating pragmatic policies.

 

and maybe you'd like to address the post!  WHERE??  WHAT?? .. What is Different other than a change of political majority?? ... .NOTTA .. that's what!

Mar 3, 2009 -- 10:46AM, Bodean wrote:

Mar 3, 2009 -- 10:42AM, Kwinters wrote:

Mar 1, 2009 -- 11:14PM, Bodean wrote:

Mar 1, 2009 -- 11:26AM, catboxer wrote:

That's because Obama's side is the side of patience, pragmatism, tolerance, and openness to experimentation and new ideas, while your side is the side of right-wing Republican reactionism.

Where??  What??

Tax the Rich? ... Nope!  Socialized Medicine? Nope! Spending out of recession?  NOPE!  Appointing partisan lacky's??  NOPE! ... for that matter .. even the notion of "changing Washington" ..... NOPE!

 

Where are those new ideas??

 

Another example of why the Grand Old Party of Rush is out of step with Americans.  They are so caught up in their distorted free-market indoctrination that they have been rendered incapable of generating pragmatic policies.

 

 

and maybe you'd like to address the post!  WHERE??  WHAT?? .. What is Different other than a change of political majority?? ... .NOTTA .. that's what!

If you think Obama's proposed socialised medicine I would recommend some therapy to divest you of the delusion that we're still in 1994.

If you're going to criticise the policies, at least try to understand what they are first instead of pretending like you're dealing with Carter or Clinton.

The GOP and their ideology are trapped in the 20th century, which is why Obama kicked your asses and why he continues to connect with moderate, independent voters.

You know, moderates and independents...the people who are fleeing the GOP in droves until all that's left is a room full of ditto-heads demanding members of Congress apologise to the Comedien-in-Chief of the GOP.

Mar 3, 2009 -- 10:48AM, Kwinters wrote:

And how did the American people react to the proposed budget?

Initial Reaction to Obama Budget Tilts Positive

PRINCETON, NJ -- Americans' first reactions to President Barack Obama's new 10-year budget plan are more positive than negative, although a sizable group of Americans say they haven't been following news about the plan and have not yet formed an opinion. The weekend Gallup Poll finds 44% of Americans saying their reaction to the new plan is positive and 26% saying it's negative, with the rest having no opinion.

http://www.gallup.com/poll/116242/Initial-Reaction-Obama-Budget-Tilts-Positive.aspx

 

Poor Republicans - they are just so out of touch!  Looks like they'll remain a regional party for the forseeable future.

All they are left with are out-dated ideas which went out of style with Reagan and all their online porn!

Boo hoo hoo.

 

You're applauding 44%?  So not everyone that voted for him is jazzed about this plan?

Wall Street certainly isnt.  So after more of the 44% see there life savings melt away.....keep you hat on.

Mar 3, 2009 -- 10:52AM, Kwinters wrote:

If you think Obama's proposed socialised medicine I would recommend some therapy to divest you of the delusion that we're still in 1994.

If you're going to criticise the policies, at least try to understand what they are first instead of pretending like you're dealing with Carter or Clinton.

The GOP and their ideology are trapped in the 20th century, which is why Obama kicked your asses and why he continues to connect with moderate, independent voters.

You know, moderates and independents...the people who are fleeing the GOP in droves until all that's left is a room full of ditto-heads demanding members of Congress apologise to the Comedien-in-Chief of the GOP.

 

 

Oh .. I don't THINK that Obama is pushing socialized medicine .. I KNOW he is.  Just because you don't recognize incrementalism when you see it .. well that is your problem not mine.

We will be going to Universal Healthcare ... managed are style ... aka Socialized Medicine.

Speaking of those independents ... bet they aren't so happy now!  I know of two moderates Brooks and Buckley, who are having misgivings about voting for Obama .. in fact, they flat out said they made a MISTAKE!  He's NOT what they thought he was.

So .. got to think .. hom many more "independents and moderates" are feeling the same way?  I'd bet a bunch, especially since most of them tend to fiscally conservative kinda folk.