Post Reply
Page 3 of 3  •  Prev 1 2 3
Switch to Forum Live View Richard Dawkins Gives Good Reasons Not To Debate Some People.
1 year ago  ::  Dec 28, 2011 - 7:58PM #21
RJMcElwain
Posts: 2,683

Dec 28, 2011 -- 6:03PM, journeying wrote:


Is there anything mystical about the creeds or are they simply man's description of Godde in terms that men at the time might understand? Is Godde really a male? Did the male Godde send his male son or did Godde come to us in the human form that the people at the time could recognize and follow? If the latter is true, why are there two separate people? Is the Holy Spirit/Ghost a third being or Godde with us? Is Godde always with us at all?


There are plenty of questions that have personal answers which enable us to live with or reject our beliefs and faith. The more literal one takes the Bible to be, the more difficult it is to discuss religion with an atheist. My atheist brother and I have had many discussions. He respects my faith because he knows that I have spent much time and effort developing it and it works for me. Over the weekend he admitted that he is beginning to see my reasoning and now wonders if I might have a point. He hasn't met anyone else who can discuss religion without getting upset. Sad as it is an interesting topic.






Extremely well articulated. I've had the same experience with my brother, who is RC. And we respect each other's understanding, and we have fantastic discussions.

Robert J. McElwain

"The strongest reason for people to retain the right to keep and bear arms is, as a last resort, to protect themselves against tyranny in government." (Supposedly)Thomas Jefferson

"He who is not angry when there is just cause for anger is immoral."
St. Thomas Aquinas

One of the penalties for refusing to participate in politics is that you end up being governed by your inferiors. Plato
Quick Reply
Cancel
1 year ago  ::  Feb 23, 2012 - 9:27AM #22
Dutch777
Posts: 8,697

Is everyone --- anyone? --- aware of this upcoming debate between the ABC and Dr. Dawkins?  The cynic in me is tempted to label this the "Fuzzy - Dickie -Drama".


I wonder if this event will be streamed?  I'd love to have the peanut-candy-popcorn concession, but most everyone will be British, so I imagine cucumber sandwiches and scones will be the order of the day.  The concession is probably socialized anyway.


oxfordstudent.com/2012/02/16/archbishop-...

Walk Your Own DharmaPath; be awake.

The Socratic Standard:  Follow the evidence;____ if it doesn't make sense, it's bull$#!+.

Dutch
Quick Reply
Cancel
1 year ago  ::  Feb 23, 2012 - 9:53AM #23
Spokang
Posts: 806

Feb 23, 2012 -- 9:27AM, Dutch777 wrote:


Is everyone --- anyone? --- aware of this upcoming debate between the ABC and Dr. Dawkins?  The cynic in me is tempted to label this the "Fuzzy - Dickie -Drama".


I wonder if this event will be streamed?  I'd love to have the peanut-candy-popcorn concession, but most everyone will be British, so I imagine cucumber sandwiches and scones will be the order of the day.  The concession is probably socialized anyway.


oxfordstudent.com/2012/02/16/archbishop-...





Here is the streaming site, Dutch.


fsmevents.com/sophiaeuropa/


Jim


Quick Reply
Cancel
1 year ago  ::  Feb 23, 2012 - 2:11PM #24
Dutch777
Posts: 8,697

Jim,


Thank you for that info.


Much appreciated.  Smile

Walk Your Own DharmaPath; be awake.

The Socratic Standard:  Follow the evidence;____ if it doesn't make sense, it's bull$#!+.

Dutch
Quick Reply
Cancel
1 year ago  ::  Feb 23, 2012 - 3:24PM #25
slate
Posts: 177

I have learned so much from this discussion.  It is the type of discussion that brings me back to this forum again and again.  Can you recommend any books that might relate to this discussion that I might be able to access?

Quick Reply
Cancel
1 year ago  ::  Feb 23, 2012 - 3:43PM #26
Dutch777
Posts: 8,697

A History of God  by Karen Armstrong.


I'm reading it right now and it's excellent.

Walk Your Own DharmaPath; be awake.

The Socratic Standard:  Follow the evidence;____ if it doesn't make sense, it's bull$#!+.

Dutch
Quick Reply
Cancel
1 year ago  ::  Feb 25, 2012 - 9:36AM #27
RJMcElwain
Posts: 2,683

Feb 25, 2012 -- 9:20AM, Nino0814 wrote:


It is unfortunate some in the media will misrepresent Dawkins, and the readers will not investigate his comments in context.  The press "jumped" on Dawkins assessment that he is not 100% certain that there is no God.  That is what you would expect of anyone who is a scientist.  On a scale of 1 to 7 (1 = absolute confidence that there is a personal deity in control of our affairs, and 7 = absolute confidence that there is no God) Dawkins rated his conficence as 6.9.


Does this scale work for you?  I am confident that God exists, but it depends on the definition of God.  In terms of the God expressed in the Bible (hands on creator and God who breaks the laws of nature), I am with Dawkins.


Where would you rate yourself, if the scale works for you?




I agree with your position. The "Sky-Daddy" brand of God just doesn't get it for me.

Robert J. McElwain

"The strongest reason for people to retain the right to keep and bear arms is, as a last resort, to protect themselves against tyranny in government." (Supposedly)Thomas Jefferson

"He who is not angry when there is just cause for anger is immoral."
St. Thomas Aquinas

One of the penalties for refusing to participate in politics is that you end up being governed by your inferiors. Plato
Quick Reply
Cancel
1 year ago  ::  Feb 25, 2012 - 1:08PM #28
Dutch777
Posts: 8,697

Feb 25, 2012 -- 9:20AM, Nino0814 wrote:

Where would you rate yourself, if the scale works for you?



My spirituality is apophatic; I don't have a concept of God.  For me, God is ultimate and beyond description and definition and concept --- for these are idols of the mind.  "God is Love" works for me; after all, love is beyond accurate definition but is highly experiential.
To experience love is to experience a taste of God.


Dawkins and I don't share the same scale.

Walk Your Own DharmaPath; be awake.

The Socratic Standard:  Follow the evidence;____ if it doesn't make sense, it's bull$#!+.

Dutch
Quick Reply
Cancel
1 year ago  ::  Feb 25, 2012 - 8:10PM #29
JimRigas
Posts: 2,440

The existence of the JudeoChristian god  = 7


The existence of some power that is interested in us and occasionally interferes on our behalf = 2.5

Quick Reply
Cancel
1 year ago  ::  Apr 09, 2012 - 9:59PM #30
Nino0814
Posts: 1,491

Watch an interesting debate between RC Cardinal George Pell of Australia and Richard Dawkins.  It is one hour but IMO worth watching.   I felt uncomfortable at times for the Cardinal, as it is clear that he does not understand evolution, while accepting it as historical fact.  He also seems at odds with the RCC with regard to the soul: hwhyevolutionistrue.wordpress.com/2012/04...


He never does address the question of original sin, given human evolution.  

Quick Reply
Cancel
Page 3 of 3  •  Prev 1 2 3
 
    Viewing this thread :: 0 registered and 1 guest
    No registered users viewing
    Advertisement

    Beliefnet On Facebook