| 3 years ago :: Jul 25, 2010 - 8:39PM #1 | |
|
by: GEORGE C. MICHALOPULOS Saturday, July 24, 2010 Recently, the Tulsa Interfaith Council sponsored an appearance by Frank Personally, I've always considered him a friend and still do. (Regina Like many prominent speakers and authors, Frank's journey has taken him Much of what he asserted was, to put it mildly, arguable. Possibly the Quite simply, this is a gratuitous assertion, one having no basis in In addition, Frank equivocated as to whether he was pro-life and Finally, he questioned the political acumen of those who are My purpose here is to state clearly and without equivocation that Frank Nevertheless, in the interest of clearing up any misconceptions, it can First of all, the Orthodox Church is evangelical. We are called to Secondly, the Orthodox Church is committed to the pro-life cause. It is We are taught as part of our penitential journey to judge nobody but In a free society we should welcome open and honest debate. I mean no ______________ www.tulsaworld.com/opinion/article.aspx?... |
|
|
Quick Reply
|
|
| 3 years ago :: Jul 26, 2010 - 4:07PM #2 | |
|
Poor Frankie. I don't know what's got into him. Do you think he craves celebrity or notoriety at any cost?
“The Law of the Church is to give oneself to what is given not to seek one’s own.” Fr. Alexander Schmemann
|
|
|
Quick Reply
|
|
| 3 years ago :: Jul 27, 2010 - 12:53AM #3 | |
|
|
|
|
Quick Reply
|
|
| 3 years ago :: Jul 27, 2010 - 4:41PM #4 | |
|
I have never heard of this person before. So if I don't know him he can't be all that famous |
|
|
Quick Reply
|
|
| 3 years ago :: Jul 30, 2010 - 2:51PM #5 | |
“The Law of the Church is to give oneself to what is given not to seek one’s own.” Fr. Alexander Schmemann
|
|
|
Quick Reply
|
|
| 3 years ago :: Jul 30, 2010 - 4:32PM #6 | |
|
Google is your friend. |
|
|
Quick Reply
|
|
| 3 years ago :: Aug 25, 2010 - 10:48AM #7 | |
|
Great analysis. I agree and hope as well that Frank can find his way back. |
|
|
Quick Reply
|
|
| 3 years ago :: Sep 10, 2010 - 10:13AM #8 | |
|
Frances Shaeffer wrote a rebuttal to Spong's The Silence of God back in the 70s. The title, IIRC was He is Here, and He is not Silent. BTW, I am Campbellite, re-incarnated. B'Net messed up my password access and the PTBs were stumped trying to fix it. |
|
|
Quick Reply
|
|
| 3 years ago :: Sep 10, 2010 - 11:25PM #9 | |
Welcome back! Its good to see you again. And you seem to have grown younger.
Sex is the mysticism of materialism and the only possible religion in a materialistic society.
|
|
|
Quick Reply
|
|
| 1 year ago :: Dec 31, 2011 - 6:36AM #10 | |
|
I did not hear Frank's talk so can only comment on George's interpretation of it. I wonder what Frank would have said if George had asked him to elaborate on any comment that may have referred to evangelicals as sinister? Believe we all know that Frank is well aware that the Orthodox Catholic Church is evangelical. Believe it is obvious that he must have been referring to ultra right Protestant Evangelicals of which we can all name a lot of examples. Pat Robertson and his ilk have come close to calling for the death of homosexuals. Laws to kill homosexuals [prompted by ultra right American Protestant Evangelicals] have been been proposed in Kenya and several other African nations. Frank's comments about some of these far right Protestant Evangelicals were probably "right on". George's comment on Frank's pro-life views did not clarify exactly what Frank said. I have heard Frank talk previously at an Orthodox Catholic parish in Virginia and his comments there were strongly pro-life, from conception to natural death. Some right wing Publicans I know say they are "pro-life" but they storngly most support executing people, even for non-murder type crimes. That is really not being fully "pro-life". As far as any comment Frank made about the political acuity of traditional and culturally conservative Orthodox Catholics I fully agree with him. Such comments, of course, were purely political. We all know that Frank is fully aware that Christ's body, the Orthodox Catholic Church, does not exclude anyone based on political party affiliation, or on how politically knowledgeable or aware they are. I doubt that Frank intended to speak for the Orthodox Catholic Church, or thought that his comments would have to be limited to the Orthodox faith and he would not be allowed to make any political comments. His views may have represented many in the left of Orthodox Catholic faith but they were certainly grounded in his faith. Many Orthodox would say the term "secular" would be more appropriately used to describe some of the ultra right wing views of adherents of the faith. Frank probably speaks [politically] for a significant portion of our faith if not a majority. html_removed |
|
|
Quick Reply
|
|

