Sorry, but that link doesn't work.

Dusty

I have done some reading on it and we can always learn more. One can not look at Paul the same way over the years or so it would seem for me a least.

One of the comments made brought to mind a practical and functional aspect to Paul's doctrine, if you want to ensure that the church remains a gentile church, you have to have a mechanism that distances one institution from the other,
In order words, you don't achieve it by attacking the other institution, you just make sure that your institution operates under another set of rules, both inclusive and exclusive.
Inclusive because he had to base the church's doctrine on the universal aspects of God's revealtion.
Exclusive because he had to make sure that the Church could operate as a gentile institution, otherwise it would never have survived.
The price to be paid was the almost complete disappearance of the Messianic church, something he had to be aware of, something you can argue as something he tried to avoid throughout his body of work.