Thanks for the compliment that people are reading and studying my words. Maybe. But admonishing me to be correct I'm frankly afraid is awfully arrogant. Nobody knows everything. The Christian WOMAN who some say is another Esther, of Micah 4 and Revelation 12, is endorsed as CORRECT, in, I think w/out actually looking it up right now, the last verse.
I was quoting birwin4. That's to whom my reply was directed. Although, the same applies to yourself. Your words are being read by many people. It is incumbent on you to be correct in your words. You have no choice in the matter. You only think you do. If you believe that you are wrong, or there is the least chance that what you say could mean something else, then you must wait until you are absolutely sure of your words. If you don't, one day I'll witness your regret. That has nothing to do with being arrogant. I use this same principle in all my dealings with anyone. When interpreting, you are dealing with God. Doesn't he deserve the same respect? Michae1
Hi, Michael, 3 or 4 days later...didn't get a notification.
Thanks for the explanation that you're quoting birwind. I think/hope it's understood that we're all just reasoning together by submitting our opinions, whether or not we always remember to say so, with "JMPO" or similar disclaimer.
Just so we all know, a WOMAN can be the one who's right, on any subject, numerous examples in Bible, most relevant one on this subject Revelation 12. I think it's in the last verse. Could be earlier, but it's there somewhere.
Israel is certainly involved, big time, in the last days, but so is the "GREAT FALLING AWAY", maybe mostly in America, traditionally a Christian nation, which is also part of Israel, spiritually, "grafted in" to the vine.
We're both right that a coalition of nations will attack Israel, and I'm saying maybe America again too, as well as Israel.
People have Israel pretty well covered, so I'm concentrating mostly on the great falling away, covert reign of the beast and false prophet, (to be revealed, but it doesn't say exactly how). "He", maybe meaning both of the partners, for a time gets laws and customs changed, Daniel 7:25 and 26, for example possibly the "coming out" and establishing of "gay pride", some of the churches voting to go along with new laws, just one example to let us know what time it is, where we are, in prophecy.
You have to admit a great falling away is important. Revelation pretty much starts out with a critique of some example churches, with their differences, united only by their common belief in Christ, just like the denominations today are different styles of believers in Christ. Nothing is said about exactly HOW THEY WORSHIP, which at least one denomination boasts is what it's all about. ("Salvation is not by works, lest anyone should boast", and wouldn't that include not boasting they're the only ones worshipping correctly? Obviously, that's for sheep-stealing, competition for members purposes, right? 2nd Chronicles 7:14 may very well be about one group more than others (or may not be about any specific one) smack in the middle of admonitions about more ancient things, stuck in there so that maybe the beast won't notice and get it deleted, IF he's from that denomination as I suspect because there's a talebearer, like "the accuser of the brethren", Rev. 12, "who opposeth", 2nd Thess. 2. If this wasn't important it wouldn't be in the last Book of the Bible, God's final word, which I sadly have to report "takes away from" by claiming it's just not understandable.
Would God give us something that's completely not understandable? I fear for them, some of my family still hostages there, maybe with those strong delusions. We're to simply pray for wisdom, James 1, and will get enough to keep us until it all, every bit of it, has come to pass. We're agreed about that, right?
The general meaning is this. Satan, cast out of heaven, knows that his time is short and is determined to do as much damage as he can. To cause that damage on earth he delegates his power to the two beasts who are the central figures in this chapter. The beast from the sea stands for the Roman Empire, to John the incarnation of evil and is described in terms which come from Daniel. In Dn.7:3-7 there is a vision of four great beasts who come out of the sea; they are the symbols of the great empires which have held world power and of an empire which, when Daniel was written, was holding world sway. The beast like a lion with an eagle's wings stands for Babylon; the one like a bear stands for Media; the one like a leopard with four wings stands for Persia; and the fourth stands for the empire of Alexander the Great. As the writer of Daniel saw these world powers, they were so savage and inhuman that they could be symbolized by nothing but bestial figures. It was only natural for a Jew to go back to this picture of the beastly empires when he wished to find a picture of another satanic empire threatening God's people in his own day. John's picture in the Revelation puts together in the one beast the features of all four. It is like a leopard with bear's feet and a lion's mouth. That is to say, for John the Roman Empire was so satanic that it included all the terrors of the evil empires which had gone before. This beast has seven heads and ten horns. These stand for the rulers and the emperors of Rome. Since Augustus, the first Roman Emperor, there had been seven emperors; Tiberius, A.D. 14-37; Caligula, A.D. 37-41; Claudius, A.D. 41-54; Nero, A.D. 55-68; Vespasian, A.D. 69-79; Titus, A.D. 79-81; Domitian, A.D. 81-96. These seven emperors are the seven heads of the beast. But in addition it is said that the beast had ten horns. The explanation of this second figure lies in this. After the death of Nero there was a short period of almost complete chaos. In eighteen months three different men briefly occupied the imperial power, Galba, Otho and Vitellius. They are not included in John's list of the seven heads but are included in the list of the ten horns. John says that on the heads of the beast there were blasphemous names. These are the titles which the emperors took to themselves. Every emperor was called divus or sebastos, which means divine. Frequently the very name God or Son of God was given to the emperors; and Nero on his coins called himself The Saviour of the World. For any man to call himself divine was a blasphemous insult to God. Further, the later emperors took as their title the Latin word dominus, or its Greek equivalent kurios (GSN2962), both of which mean lord, and in the Old Testament are the special title of God and in the New Testament the special title of Jesus Christ. The second beast which figures in this chapter, the beast from the land, is the whole provincial organization of magistrates and priesthoods designed to enforce Caesar worship, which confronted the Christians with the choice either of saying, "Caesar is Lord," or of dying. So, then, our picture falls into place. These two savage beasts, the might of Rome and the organization of Caesar worship, launched their combined attack on the Christians--and no nation had ever withstood the might of Rome. What hope had the Christians--poor, defenceless, outlaws?
If: '7025' before the flood + ~70 00 BC + 2012 = '16,037' years
And, 666 is given: '16,037'/666 = 24.07957957957958...
.07957 957... x 666 = 53; 1948 + 53 = 2001...
'16,037'/777 = 20.63963963963964 Joshua; + 2001 =
1998/666 = 3.
plus 14 Jacob = 2012; the ninth day is Monday ; Her Feet Over The Moon. + 9
The general meaning is this. Satan, cast out of heaven, knows that his time is short and is determined to do as much damage as he can. To cause that damage on earth he delegates his power to the two beasts who are the central figures in this chapter. The beast from the sea stands for the Roman Empire, to John the incarnation of evil and is described in terms which come from Daniel. In Dn.7:3-7 there is a vision of four great beasts who come out of the sea; they are the symbols of the great empires which have held world power and of an empire which, when Daniel was written, was holding world sway. The beast like a lion with an eagle's wings stands for Babylon; the one like a bear stands for Media; the one like a leopard with four wings stands for Persia; and the fourth stands for the empire of Alexander the Great. As the writer of Daniel saw these world powers, they were so savage and inhuman that they could be symbolized by nothing but bestial figures. It was only natural for a Jew to go back to this picture of the beastly empires when he wished to find a picture of another satanic empire threatening God's people in his own day. John's picture in the Revelation puts together in the one beast the features of all four. It is like a leopard with bear's feet and a lion's mouth. That is to say, for John the Roman Empire was so satanic that it included all the terrors of the evil empires which had gone before. This beast has seven heads and ten horns. These stand for the rulers and the emperors of Rome. Since Augustus, the first Roman Emperor, there had been seven emperors; Tiberius, A.D. 14-37; Caligula, A.D. 37-41; Claudius, A.D. 41-54; Nero, A.D. 55-68; Vespasian, A.D. 69-79; Titus, A.D. 79-81; Domitian, A.D. 81-96. These seven emperors are the seven heads of the beast. But in addition it is said that the beast had ten horns. The explanation of this second figure lies in this. After the death of Nero there was a short period of almost complete chaos. In eighteen months three different men briefly occupied the imperial power, Galba, Otho and Vitellius. They are not included in John's list of the seven heads but are included in the list of the ten horns. John says that on the heads of the beast there were blasphemous names. These are the titles which the emperors took to themselves. Every emperor was called divus or sebastos, which means divine. Frequently the very name God or Son of God was given to the emperors; and Nero on his coins called himself The Saviour of the World. For any man to call himself divine was a blasphemous insult to God. Further, the later emperors took as their title the Latin word dominus, or its Greek equivalent kurios (GSN2962), both of which mean lord, and in the Old Testament are the special title of God and in the New Testament the special title of Jesus Christ. The second beast which figures in this chapter, the beast from the land, is the whole provincial organization of magistrates and priesthoods designed to enforce Caesar worship, which confronted the Christians with the choice either of saying, "Caesar is Lord," or of dying. So, then, our picture falls into place. These two savage beasts, the might of Rome and the organization of Caesar worship, launched their combined attack on the Christians--and no nation had ever withstood the might of Rome. What hope had the Christians--poor, defenceless, outlaws?
If: '7025' before the flood + ~70 00 BC + 2012 = '16,037' years
And, 666 is given: '16,037'/666 = 24.07957957957958...
.07957 957... x 666 = 53; 1948 + 53 = 2001...
'16,037'/777 = 20.63963963963964 Joshua; + 2001 =
1998/666 = 3.
plus 14 Jacob = 2012; the ninth day is Monday ; Her Feet Over The Moon. + 9
And, 2/3 'Judea' = .66666... and the 6th Seal is written with 4 horses unfolding coming forward.
I and probably everyone else here too, have heard this theory before.
As I've said before in this thread, we all understand these are just opinions, right? That we don't always have to write JMHO, as some forums require, because it's just understood, right?
Daniel 7 is one of my favorite prophecy references or cross references. Personally, I think the 4 beasts may be leaders, but I grant you maybe they're both that and nations as you say. What's most interesting to me about the chapter is verses 25 and 26 about the one who's been getting laws and customs changed finally being brought to some judgement, a courtroom, sounds like, "AND NONE SHALL HELP HIM".
That's one of the reasons the four sound like individuals to me. But he has an underground, we're told in other passages. Some say masonic New World Order. Isn't it a bit odd that even his underground won't help him when his judgement sits?
Hope everyone had a nice Christmas. We're not having ours until Wednesday afternoon, so I had a couple of extra days to prepare, and I think I'm just about all set. Some of the family live out of state and couldn't come until now. Happy New Year, too, let me say now in case I don't get back. Been having some hacker problems. It's been fun saying Merry Christmas, hasn't it?
The following letter is a summary of Revelation 13. ,,,,,,,, Who is the false prophet, and how does he make the whole world worship the beast whose number is 666. ... Literally, what time frame should I see them? ......IMO, since there's been so much talk about masonic N.W.O. taking over, the false prophet who's into CHANGE, changing laws and customs, (Dan. 7:25, 26) until he gets hauled into court somehow, simply flatters and enlists that group, which is probably the worldwide "city" or organization which covertly "rules kings of earth", and although "experts" have always cited numerology about 666, if we pray for wisdom (James 1) we may come up with another idea, very simple, because, would God ever give us info we can't with His help understand? The beast may simply belong in that organization and have six letters in each name, as Reagan did but he's gone so it's obviously not him. They just may both belong to the same denomination, trying to make it the rumored "one world religion", or may be corrupting it and planning to install their own version, giving resistors a very hard time, so we can't even use our currency (?) in the mkt place, Rev. 14, but it's a loyalty-to-Christ test, our "final exam". JMO, which is all any of us can give.
I'm trying to be very brief, so not taking on every question, but I really like your statement that "Some events have happened, while some are waiting to happen. It is the ones that have not happened that we are most concerned with." ......
"Revelation 13:1. The beast has seven heads and ten horns. In Revelation 17 those heads and horns are defined. The heads are identified as mountains, while the horns are identified as kings. Now Rev.13:1 can be read as follows with just the items discussed thus far. And I saw a beast rise up out of the sea having seven mountains and ten kings." Love it. The 7 "heads" are a/k/a kings, so probably are presidents, right here in U.S., Reagan the one who received a normally-deadly wound but lived, and after that he seemed to change from defending the Rev. 12 (and book of Micah, victim of youeurism conspiracy at Lachish archeology dig, all that's left of the city, showing it's the time of technology, Watergating experiment possibly, when Nixon group went to visit Mier?) to telling a famous advice columnist publicly that it's not a "false Cassandra" that we have. How soon after that change did he develop alzheimers? I've never thought to try to figure that up. Maybe you know. Anyway, I don't know why the heads are called mountains in Rev. 17, had noticed that myself. Could it mean higher ups in N.W.O.?
...... I almost always get this question. How can you know who the beast is when he cannot be revealed? 2nd Thess. Chapter 2 states that he cannot be revealed, until something is removed first. ...Don't most scholars think it's not The Rapture but that the Holy Spirit is removed? (And that opinion may be wrong too.) Some ways the false prophet is to be revealed are: He teaches hatred in the house of his God, He relentlessly persecutes a Christian woman, slandering her with falsifications like a flood of water, but earth "swallows up the flood", Rev. 12, and she's probably the same book of Micah woman, because Rev. 12 says her other children, after her house is made desolate, evidently of her own children, maybe in fear, are all the saved, so she must be somehow broadcasting to them, maybe without knowing it (?) The scenario is war, enmity, betw the woman and the false prophet, beast, and dragon, Satan, who may be inhabiting one of them. Is it 1st or 2nd Cor. 11:14, I forget, which says Satan himself is in religion, POSING AS one of the messengers (angels) of light. Peter tells us anyone who instead of talking about Christ , propagandizes I guess, his envy and hatred, is an antichrist. There's at least one denomination I happen to know of, maybe more, which rejects Revelation (as not understandable, but would God give us something we could never hope to understand?) and misses out on the warnings near the end of the book about falsified evidences, I guess, "that which maketh a lie". They are so sure they're the smartest denomination, and that all the others will be lost for not joining them in misinterpretation of "singing and making melody in your hearts". They claim, it's saying the heart is the only musical INSTRUMENT we're authorized to use, despite "the harps of God" being used IN WORSHIP in Revelation, at least three places, and 20-30 verses about singing, according to my online search, don't know if they found them all, which either endorse or don't mention any instrumental music doctrine. We're not to preach any other doctrine than WAS preached, and, as far as we know, the early churches had none re how to worship except "in spirit and in truth". Right? Some have called them a MILITANT group or cult, and some have cited 2nd Chronicles 7:14, that one group need to humble THEMSELVES, (maybe meaning rather than a musician woman) and repent of some WICKED WAYS. I'm hoping they'll come to realize praying for wisdom COULDN'T HURT, and really repent. The Micah woman is told to rise and begin to thresh, that she will become wealthy, but by Rev. 12, is God letting her off the hook, in your opinion, and possibly others' here? Because she and the Rev. 22 TWO WITNESSES' period of testimony seems to be the very same 1260 "days", she may not want to break up her family, wants them all to view the Second Coming together, also because the Two Witnesses get killed. Is God letting her decline to rise up, by not repeating this in Rev. 12? Or is there maybe more than one woman it's happened to, a fact that's not mentioned anywhere?
The late Presbyterian pastor D. James Kennedy used to say the 10 horns are ten territorial overlords, as if he maybe knows something, possibly about N.W.O.? We know the heads or kings are just 7 or 8 in number. I can't remember, was Kennedy one of the three temporary "Moral Majority"? He was a PhD, and pretty intellectual. How could he have been fooled by (the false prophet, who "corrupts men with flattery"?) such "change" people into that? If he was. ....
Re the mark of the beat..... "Imagine people running around with a mark of 666 on their right hands. It sounds like a cartoon, but this is what the prophecy teachers want you to believe."
Amen. Or an implant, when so many of us already know they can cause cancer, have been used so long for tracking our pets.
"Ok, another problem that sounds like a cartoon is the interpretation of the word "all." They want you to believe that no man could buy or sell if they did not worship the beast and take his mark. Interpreting the word "all" to mean everyone in the world. This is not the case. For one, we know that the beast is made up of only possibly ten countries. " Don't the ten countries refer to the final attack on Israel? And a Christian muslim on Syd Ross' program said they're all muslim countries except Russia. About the beast, in other places, doesn't it say that for a time he manages to fool most of the world, except a remnant, those that agree with the woman's resisting his changes? Maybe the mark is beliefs, rather than a tatoo or physical? We'll have to wait and see. Must agree with your next paragraph, Revived Roman Empire, so skipping it in my reply.
The word mountains can have two meanings. It can be either a mountain range, or a nation. This is the hardest part of this whole exercise, trying to figure out what mountains are describing. Teachers will have you believe it is a city with seven mountains. In actual fact, mountains here are referring to nations......
Or, if D. James Kennedy was into ill-reputed and I guess unscriptural "Moral Majority" for a time, very possibly he knew additional plans, including "10 overlords" over all the territories of the earth. Let's just keep this possibility in our big picture for now until we find out for sure, okay? And the Bible does not actually say the head (of state/king) received a HEAD wound. It could have been in his chest. I forget where Reagan's was. Maybe you remember? Notice it doesn't say a head wound, as men have been assuming for a long time. It was a wound to a head of state! Right? Of course nations are wounded, we're told in several places, for instance in Jeremiah 12:5 to end of chapter, the nation that lets some big brothers keep deceiving a man about his beloved, obviously for money, inheritance purposes, probably trying to get rid of her like the woman in Rev. 12, who may be the same one, "I will utterly pluck up and destroy." And in the 2nd Chronicles reference I've already mentioned here, it says their NATION needs to be healed, after their repentance from forbidden WICKED WAYS. Ancient Daniel (ch 11?) says "He shall give him THE DAUGHTER OF WOMEN, but she shall not be on his side." They may have had some Watergating technology implanted when she had some surgery, which they wanted to test, and also thought she'd help preach against instrumental music accompaniment to singing? She may be a musician, who worked for one of their colleges. Some from there have boasted of some kind of involvement with Lachish. Which is no longer a city, just an archeology site. ........
"The three kings who were subdued by the beast were Israeli Prime Ministers. These three Prime Ministers all served during the seven years of the Oslo Accords and were voted out of office because of terror perpetrated during Yasser Arafat's rule. " Keeping this for future reference, because new information to me. Thanks. Also can't argue with the nations you list waging war, and wonder what's your opinion of "the 8th king is the beast" if I'm right that the fooled presidents, like when Bush Sr. said, "The church can do anything it wants", as his copout way of replying to rumored mailed protests of something or other. Not saying he was definitely one of the seven, don't claim to know which ones they were, in America and maybe also another set in another part of the world, as you're saying below, but the woman flies somewhere, so it's in the time of flying and LOOK UPON technology. (How could "many nations" look upon her, maybe a special TB channel she doesn't know about?) ...An opinion, please, if you're not too afraid of "them" whoever or whatever they are.
"I can easily see seven nations that will wage war here very soon; Syria, Lebanon, Jordan, Egypt, Iran and the Palestinian Authority or Iraq, and there opponent Israel. This is exactly the same beast that is presented in Rev.17:10, just in a slightly different appearance. There are seven kings, five are fallen. This means five kings were defeated in war. Israel is referred to the "one that is," and the one that came later is the Palestinian Authority. This is a description of Israel's war for Independence. Literally, this was the beast being born. The war in 1967 is the beast rising up out of the sea in Rev.13:1. It was the unresolved issues of this conflict that resulted in the Oslo Accords of 1993. This seven year peace treaty was confirmed by Yitzhak Rabin and Yasser Arafat.
Now, there is another beast in Rev.13:11. This beast has two horns or kings. This is a picture of the Palestinian Authority after the elections of January 2006. This is when Hamas ran in the elections and won a majority in parliament. Now the P.A. was a country with two kings. Abbas was the President and Ismail Haniyeh was the Prime Minister. Here is where the problem with money came about. Western Nations did not want to donate money to a known terrorist organization so looked for a way they could still fund Abbas's P.A., but not let any money get to Hamas. This is when the number 666 identified an individual. The temporary international mechanism was adopted on June 16, 2006. This program allowed Western Nations to donate funds directly to Abbas, while bypassing Hamas. If you were a member of Fatah, or on Abbas's payroll you got paid. This is how the people were allowed to buy and sell. They received salaries, whereas before the mechanism, they had no way of getting paid from the Government. Hamas did not receive salaries. Also, Hamas did not receive the mark of the beast. They boycotted the elections for President in Jan. 2005. It is more obvious who is being talked about the closer you get to the end.
In conclusion, to my three beast definitions. Mahmoud Abbas fits all three definitions. He was a member of the P.A. when it was formed. He took over from Yasser Arafat after his death. He was one of the two kings of the second beast in Rev.13:11. Lastly, he is the one identified by the number 666, which could have been Arafat had he lived.
Now, concerning the the false prophet. The following four verses below all refer to the false prophet, Ismail Haniyeh.
Rev.13:11- and I beheld another beast coming up out of the Earth, and he had two horns like a lamb, and he spake as a dragon. Rev.13:12- And he exercises all the power of the first beast before him, and causes the earth and them which dwell therein, to worship
( the first beast, whose deadly wound was healed.) There goes my Reagan theory, or, possibly it means he was just part of the first beast, or something like that. Have to think about this again, always assumed he might try to force us to worship Reagan's "image". Doing great wonders might also mean great deceptions? Falsified evidences against the loyal believers? Thanks for all the Israel info I didn't study. Through the years, the ACLU and others have lamented the forsaking of our constitutional rights, remember, maybe spying on all of us electronically and citing "for they watch for your souls", which obviously doesn't mean illegally. What could "fire from Heaven" mean? I know you're aware prophecies can have more than one meaning.
Rev.13:13- "And he does great wonders, so that he makes fire come down from heaven on the Earth in the sight of men". Rev.13:15- And he had power to give life unto the image of the beast, that the image of the beast should both speak, and cause that as many as would not worship the image of the beast, should be killed.
Hamas exercised all the power of the first beast (Abbas's P.A.) because they were now an equal partner in the Government. Also, the leader of Hamas caused them to worship or honor the first beast because Hamas would not honor the first beast. The first beast was the PA without Hamas as a member. The image of the beast is what the Government of Mahmoud Abbas represented. Verse 12 does not mention the image yet, we are just informed that the false prophet caused them to worship the first beast. Verse 14 and 15 gives the details of how that worshipping or honor was to commence. An image was created of the first beast that he (the false prophet) caused to be honored. This image of the beast is three items; the recognition of Israel, the honoring of all prior Palestinian agreements, and a renunciation of terror.
...Word " Many" in Hebrew is Rab. This was a covenant confirmed with Yitzhak Rabin. It was the beginning of land for peace, or the Oslo Accords. When you see this agreement happen you should be aware that this prophecy will last seven years. There is only one problem with this item. Prior to it happening, everyone thought that the end of the seventh year of the agreement God would return and begin his rest. .......
May God bless all who read this letter.
Michae1
Many thanks, Michael, for this study. It was a lot of work. And now may I ask a question? Do you or anyone reading here have a concordance, not new, because the beast and false prophet could be getting publishers to change things, already may have removed what I'm looking for, that I know I've read. Would you look up word Chaldeans, and the verse "He uses the natural violence of the Chaldeans as a COVER", please? I've already searched online. Hope I can find my old Cruden's, which may not have noticed this. Can't remember where I found it. Another of the many scattered clues to the partners' ID. Start a new thread if you find it? Possibly a threat to nations' national security, imo, just guessing and being an elderly woman, with a family of grown children and grandchildren, one son a pilot, AF vet, I don't want to go public, was raised to love privacy, and most are prejudged against believing women anyway. You can have it if you want. Thanks.