| 5 years ago :: Feb 19, 2008 - 6:37PM #51 | |
Non Quis, Sed Quid
|
|
|
Quick Reply
|
|
| 5 years ago :: Feb 19, 2008 - 6:39PM #52 | |
Non Quis, Sed Quid
|
|
|
Quick Reply
|
|
| 5 years ago :: Feb 19, 2008 - 6:42PM #53 | |
Non Quis, Sed Quid
|
|
|
Quick Reply
|
|
| 5 years ago :: Feb 19, 2008 - 9:56PM #54 | |
|
Greetings, Gentlemen (and Ladies, if you are popping in from time to time):
Here is a little studying I did. Much of this is from various websites, from Jewish to Evangelical. I hope you are able to make sense of it. Deborah provided legal and military deliverance. She also provided spiritual leadership toward Israel’s obedience, as opposed to some other judges who were not so good, and led the Israelites into disobedience. That is spiritual leadership. She was a vessel for discipline to the nation. It was like the nation was her one big church, and she was leading them to obedience. If that is not spiritual leadership of God’s people then I don’t know what is. Deborah played a civil role in a military situation. She and one other anonymous figure at the time of Gideon are referred to as prophets. The distinction is clearly ketaric. Judges were raised up to lead the people civilly and militarily. Deborah and the anonymous prophet, on the other hand, pass on God's communications to the people and are designated by the appropriate ketaric name. Judges presents the tribal federation in its minimalist state -- what happens when the federation becomes, in fact, a loose confederation and "every man does what is right in his own eyes." Power has reverted to the tribal elders, assisted by regional shofetim (judges, who lead the tribes in battle and administer justice as much as or more than they adjudicate disputes), who share the keter malkhut. The keter kehunah is also handled by local priests and Levites while the keter torah functions through the prophets that appear periodically. But if that is not enough for Deborah’s sake, then consider the following: Phoebe (Rom. 16:1-2) – she was a deaconess: Phoebe is mentioned by Paul in Romans 16:1-2. The NIV translates it as follows: “1I commend to you our sister Phoebe, a servant of the church in Cenchrea. 2I ask you to receive her in the Lord in a way worthy of the saints and to give her any help she may need from you, for she has been a great help to many people, including me.” (Romans 16:1-2, NIV) The word that the NIV (and KJV) translates as “servant” is actually from the Greek word diakonos, which, according to Thayer’s Greek Definitions means: “1b) a deacon, one who, by virtue of the office assigned to him by the church, cares for the poor and has charge of and distributes the money collected for their use” We can thus assume that Phoebe held the office of deacon in her church (the NIV has a note which gives an alternative translation of diakonos as “deaconess”). Priscilla (Rom. 16:3-5; 1 Cor 16:19) – she founded at least two churches with her husband Aquila, and Priscilla is named first, which suggests that her role was more significant. Junias (Rom. 16:7) – she was an outstanding apostle. One way of reading it is to view that Paul was saying that Andronicus and Junias were outstanding apostles – and Junias is the feminine form of a Greek name. If this is the correct interpretation, then we have a female apostle. Nympha (Col. 4:15) – she started a church in her house Euodia and Syntiche (Phil. 4:2-3) – they were missionaries who assisted Paul You will probably all argue that these women only held the services in their homes, but it was men who pastured them. However, if that were the case, it would be men who were honored for their pastorate, not the women recognized simply for hosting the services. While this has been a very interesting study for me, I must focus on my education again. I have neglected my studying, and I have mid-terms coming up. Many blessings to you all as we all earnestly seek understanding of scriptures and of the Lord himself. An |
|
|
Quick Reply
|
|
| 5 years ago :: Feb 19, 2008 - 10:41PM #55 | |
Non Quis, Sed Quid
|
|
|
Quick Reply
|
|
| 5 years ago :: Feb 19, 2008 - 10:45PM #56 | |
|
Ro 1:1 ¶ Paul, a servant doulos/slave of Jesus Christ, called to be an apostle, separated unto the gospel of God,
Ro 16:27 To God only wise, be glory through Jesus Christ for ever. Amen. Written to the Romans from Corinthus, [and sent by Phebe servant diakonos/ originally table-waiter of the church at Cenchrea. Phm 1:25 The grace of our Lord Jesus Christ be with your spirit. Amen. Written from Rome to Philemon, by Onesimus a servant. oiketes/domestic servant italics indicates not part of original text
Non Quis, Sed Quid
|
|
|
Quick Reply
|
|
| 5 years ago :: Feb 20, 2008 - 2:14AM #57 | |
|
Dear Dave, An, Ted and Co.,
Dave's post #52 gets to the heart of why there are a lot of interpretations that are different, and why it can be difficult to determine what the author intended. The church titles often sprang from their purpose: I minister to people at church, but I am not a minister; I have a mission to evangelize, but am not an evangelist or missionary; I am old, but I'm not an elder. In Luke 16:13-15 Jesus chose twelve of his disciples (all men, right?), whom he designated apostles, and this became both the duty and title of the Twelve. The term is used exclusively for the Twelve, until the gospel spread to the Gentiles, whereupon it not only becomes a title for Paul, but then in places seems to refer to any missionary - the duty that gave the title its name. So did Andronicus and Junias have the same title and authority as the Twelve men that Jesus chose, or where they missionaries, or were they outstanding in the opinion of the apostles, as some translations choose. This is where my mind gauges "most probable", "possible", and "unlikely" (currently in reverse order). And while I agree that the women you (An) mentioned were excellent workers for the Lord, I'm not sure how you drew some of your conclusions. For example, Priscilla and Aquila certainly were an effective team, but sometimes Priscilla is listed first and other times Aquila is listed first. (Sometimes different translations were different on the same verse, so I went back to a Greek Bible to determine which was right (I am useless for anything in Greek except picking out proper names) and that was also inconclusive - perhaps Dave can clarify. While the church in Laodicea (possibly Colosse) met at Nympha's house as you state, Colossians 1:7 and 4:13 suggest that Epaphras was more likely the initial missionary in Colosse, Laodicea and Hieropolis, and continued to work in these three towns. Acts 12:12 suggests that the church in Jerusalem met at the home of Mary, the mother of Mark (at least on this occasion), but I don't see where she was mentioned as a leader of the Jerusalem church. In terms of greetings at the end of the letter, I would assume that these people were not the main recipients of the letter, which were addressed at the beginning of letters. If I were to write a letter to my old church, I might send it to the elders or preacher, but at the end I would write "Give my love to Nancy and Harry" (my dear friends, but did not hold an office), "Say 'Hi' to Amy, Jaime, Danielle and John" (in the singles class I taught, though they taught me as well). I'm somewhat surprised by the length of Paul's greetings when he had yet not been to Rome. God bless you on your exams, An! Dave |
|
|
Quick Reply
|
|
| 5 years ago :: Feb 19, 2008 - 9:56PM #58 | |
|
Greetings, Gentlemen (and Ladies, if you are popping in from time to time):
Here is a little studying I did. Much of this is from various websites, from Jewish to Evangelical. I hope you are able to make sense of it. Deborah provided legal and military deliverance. She also provided spiritual leadership toward Israel’s obedience, as opposed to some other judges who were not so good, and led the Israelites into disobedience. That is spiritual leadership. She was a vessel for discipline to the nation. It was like the nation was her one big church, and she was leading them to obedience. If that is not spiritual leadership of God’s people then I don’t know what is. Deborah played a civil role in a military situation. She and one other anonymous figure at the time of Gideon are referred to as prophets. The distinction is clearly ketaric. Judges were raised up to lead the people civilly and militarily. Deborah and the anonymous prophet, on the other hand, pass on God's communications to the people and are designated by the appropriate ketaric name. Judges presents the tribal federation in its minimalist state -- what happens when the federation becomes, in fact, a loose confederation and "every man does what is right in his own eyes." Power has reverted to the tribal elders, assisted by regional shofetim (judges, who lead the tribes in battle and administer justice as much as or more than they adjudicate disputes), who share the keter malkhut. The keter kehunah is also handled by local priests and Levites while the keter torah functions through the prophets that appear periodically. But if that is not enough for Deborah’s sake, then consider the following: Phoebe (Rom. 16:1-2) – she was a deaconess: Phoebe is mentioned by Paul in Romans 16:1-2. The NIV translates it as follows: “1I commend to you our sister Phoebe, a servant of the church in Cenchrea. 2I ask you to receive her in the Lord in a way worthy of the saints and to give her any help she may need from you, for she has been a great help to many people, including me.” (Romans 16:1-2, NIV) The word that the NIV (and KJV) translates as “servant” is actually from the Greek word diakonos, which, according to Thayer’s Greek Definitions means: “1b) a deacon, one who, by virtue of the office assigned to him by the church, cares for the poor and has charge of and distributes the money collected for their use” We can thus assume that Phoebe held the office of deacon in her church (the NIV has a note which gives an alternative translation of diakonos as “deaconess”). Priscilla (Rom. 16:3-5; 1 Cor 16:19) – she founded at least two churches with her husband Aquila, and Priscilla is named first, which suggests that her role was more significant. Junias (Rom. 16:7) – she was an outstanding apostle. One way of reading it is to view that Paul was saying that Andronicus and Junias were outstanding apostles – and Junias is the feminine form of a Greek name. If this is the correct interpretation, then we have a female apostle. Nympha (Col. 4:15) – she started a church in her house Euodia and Syntiche (Phil. 4:2-3) – they were missionaries who assisted Paul You will probably all argue that these women only held the services in their homes, but it was men who pastured them. However, if that were the case, it would be men who were honored for their pastorate, not the women recognized simply for hosting the services. While this has been a very interesting study for me, I must focus on my education again. I have neglected my studying, and I have mid-terms coming up. Many blessings to you all as we all earnestly seek understanding of scriptures and of the Lord himself. An |
|
|
Quick Reply
|
|
| 5 years ago :: Feb 19, 2008 - 10:41PM #59 | |
Non Quis, Sed Quid
|
|
|
Quick Reply
|
|
| 5 years ago :: Feb 19, 2008 - 10:45PM #60 | |
|
Ro 1:1 ¶ Paul, a servant doulos/slave of Jesus Christ, called to be an apostle, separated unto the gospel of God,
Ro 16:27 To God only wise, be glory through Jesus Christ for ever. Amen. Written to the Romans from Corinthus, [and sent by Phebe servant diakonos/ originally table-waiter of the church at Cenchrea. Phm 1:25 The grace of our Lord Jesus Christ be with your spirit. Amen. Written from Rome to Philemon, by Onesimus a servant. oiketes/domestic servant italics indicates not part of original text
Non Quis, Sed Quid
|
|
|
Quick Reply
|
|