Interestingly, while you like to insist over-and-over-and-OVER again-and-again that "We DON'T KNOW [ ...... ]" you are none the less every bit as insistent that OTOH, "We DO KNOW [ ..... ]" ...
And as Bob observed, you agree with what I wrote. You demur at none of it.
My own Stance to to be a good bit more HUMBLE about what we DO -- and DON'T -- KNOW ...
Really? For example, you know my take on the resurrection - that it's necessarily a fiction, as being not just one miracle tale but six hopelessly incompatible miracle tales. In your view, do we know anything relevant that I missed and you haven't mentioned so far?