Post Reply
5 years ago  ::  Mar 14, 2008 - 2:49PM #1
Sfltracey
Posts: 283
Hello. When I do a reading, do I layout the cards in the same way I pulled them? If I start with the top card then that is the last card I pulled from the deck, the 10th card.

Thanks!

Tracey
Quick Reply
Cancel
5 years ago  ::  Mar 14, 2008 - 5:08PM #2
LilyRoze
Posts: 183
Hi. I think the best way to approach this issue is to be consistent with whatever you do. As long as you have in your mind the order and significance of each card you draw, I think you'll find that you can use it to help you make sense of the reading. When you really think about it, card placement is arbitrary; but as long as this card here means this in your system, then that's how you'll read it every time.

That make any sense?  ^__^


P.S.: That being said, I can tell you that when I do a ten-card reading, the first card I draw is the one covering the significator, and the tenth card I draw I place as the last card in the layout. Since you did ask...
Quick Reply
Cancel
5 years ago  ::  Mar 14, 2008 - 6:45PM #3
BeerLover
Posts: 1,012
[FONT="Georgia"][COLOR="Blue"]Do whatever feels right.  Yes it really is that simple.

Blessings on your Journey,
BeerLover

P.S.  Welcome to the Tarot boards, you too, Lily.[/COLOR]
[/FONT]
Quick Reply
Cancel
5 years ago  ::  Mar 14, 2008 - 8:35PM #4
Urukai
Posts: 1,048
Hello All,

Sfltracey,

Ask a question pull a card...

The order doesn't matter as long as you stick with the card you pulled for the question you asked.

Hugs
Quick Reply
Cancel
5 years ago  ::  Mar 15, 2008 - 2:48PM #5
Sfltracey
Posts: 283
Hi. I just was reading the replies...thank you...and want to make sure I was clear on the question.

Once I have the pulled the 10 cards...which card do you start the reading with? Is it the card on the top or bottom? When I pull the 10 cards, the card on the top is the 10th card and that is usually the one I first turn over to begin the reading. I guess as long as I am consistent it shouldn't matter but I wonder sometimes if I should be starting with the card on the bottom since that is really the first card. Do I make sense?

Thank you!

Tracey
Quick Reply
Cancel
5 years ago  ::  Mar 15, 2008 - 3:27PM #6
LilyRoze
Posts: 183

sfltracey wrote:

Hi. I just was reading the replies...thank you...and want to make sure I was clear on the question.

Once I have the pulled the 10 cards...which card do you start the reading with? Is it the card on the top or bottom? When I pull the 10 cards, the card on the top is the 10th card and that is usually the one I first turn over to begin the reading. I guess as long as I am consistent it shouldn't matter but I wonder sometimes if I should be starting with the card on the bottom since that is really the first card. Do I make sense?

Thank you!

Tracey



I see what you're getting at. I can tell you what I do when I do a ten card reading that avoids that problem.


I use the standard ten-card celtic cross method - works for me and I'm tuned to it by now. I lay the cards out as I draw them. I shuffle the deck, cut it three times, and draw the reading from the top, one card at a time. First card off the deck - goes over the significator. Second card out - crosses the first card. I lay them down as I draw them. Then you've got the rest of the cards ; first the four surrounding the cross in the middle, and then the four on the side, seven at bottom, eight above that, then nine and the whole thing topped by card ten.

I draw them from the top of the shuffled deck and lay them out as I draw them. I usually do them one at a time, talking about each one as it goes down, then go back and look at the matrix of the spread as a whole.

Does that help at all?

Quick Reply
Cancel
5 years ago  ::  Mar 15, 2008 - 3:36PM #7
LilyRoze
Posts: 183
by the way... since we're talking about reading methods.... I consider the first two cards down to be the core, the most important combination of the spread. It's in those two cards, and the way they both conflict with and support each other, that I look for the "real" question of the reading; not the question that the person I'm reading for might be thinking, but what lies beneath that question, the real issue behind it.


Because once you've got that, then you see all the rest of the cards through that lens. You might see a conflict between "should-do" and "want-to-do", or one of struggling against a power that seems to strong to overcome, or maybe a conflict of dreams versus the hard reality of trying to make them come true...

you see what I'm saying? Whatever the stated question is, there will be some more archetypal conflict or tension underneath it that is the "real" problem the person is struggling with. (unless, of course, the question itself is archetypal, such as "How do I learn to accept my inevitable death?" or something like that. Some people like to get right down to the heavy stuff). And when I feel like I've got that, then things tend to fall into place. And if the first two cards leave me completely cold, no sense of anything at all, then I'm thinking something just didn't come off right this time around.


Usually I'll start a reading and ask the person not to tell me what their question is. When I think I've got the salient core of the question, I'll ask: is this and such the conflict or problem that we're talking about here? If they tell me I'm way off the mark, I'll look for another possible interpretation. But generally, I don;t like to know the specific question that's being asked until I get a chance to see what kind of conflicts and advice is in the reading without filtering it through that.
Quick Reply
Cancel
5 years ago  ::  Mar 16, 2008 - 10:35PM #8
Sfltracey
Posts: 283
Lily Roze,

Thanks for your reply and the added info. It is helpful.

Tracey
Quick Reply
Cancel
 
    Viewing this thread :: 0 registered and 1 guest
    No registered users viewing
    Advertisement

    Beliefnet On Facebook