| 1 year ago :: Apr 12, 2012 - 3:19AM #31 | |
Yes, using the brain to re-wire the brain is essentially what brain plasticity amounts to. |
|
|
Quick Reply
|
|
| 1 year ago :: Apr 12, 2012 - 2:55PM #32 | |
|
Schwartz attributes will power as mental force. He believes in a duality between mind and brain. |
|
|
Quick Reply
|
|
| 1 year ago :: Apr 12, 2012 - 10:35PM #33 | |
Nature is the substance; mind, the function. The function never separates from substance, nor the substance from the function. Function and substance, though separate, are causally connected. Nature governs the mind, and the mind is nature’s function; they mesh. Although both retain their own character, they are inseparable. The Heart Sutra
Standard Disclaimer: This is just my 2cents worth.
|
|
|
Quick Reply
|
|
| 1 year ago :: Apr 13, 2012 - 4:02AM #34 | |
Then he is mistaken. |
|
|
Quick Reply
|
|
| 1 year ago :: Apr 13, 2012 - 10:41AM #35 | |
|
|
|
Quick Reply
|
|
| 1 year ago :: Apr 14, 2012 - 4:50PM #36 | |
Subtle it may be, but all the evidence points to the mind being a product of the brain. There is no evidence pointing in the other direction. |
|
|
Quick Reply
|
|
| 1 year ago :: Apr 15, 2012 - 2:51AM #37 | |
|
It's relative to what you accept as evidence. |
|
|
Quick Reply
|
|
| 1 year ago :: Apr 15, 2012 - 6:09PM #38 | |
It's not a matter of choosing the evidence, but letting the evidence speak for itself. And all the compelling evidence points to the mind being a product of the brain. |
|
|
Quick Reply
|
|
| 1 year ago :: Apr 15, 2012 - 11:03PM #39 | |
|
Evidence doesn't speak for itself, imho we depend on perception for our understanding of reality. |
|
|
Quick Reply
|
|
| 1 year ago :: Apr 16, 2012 - 2:38AM #40 | |
But even then the weight of certain evidence is overwhelming, like the fact that the brain produces mind. As I said, there is no evidence to the contrary. |
|
|
Quick Reply
|
|