Feb 8, 2010 -- 1:09PM, BBarton wrote:

Thank you, Serenity; blessed be!

Thank you, Shamanmystic.

Do you recall where he speaks of the redundancy of feeling feelings being akin to hearing sound, seeing a site, etc...?  These are senses not who we are, but what we experience; therefore, we are not the feeling, but the fealing is a sense to aid us.  -A language of Spirit all creation speaks.

 

You separate the thinker from the thought and the 'feeler' from the one who is feeling, BBarton?

Where is the justification for that?

Feb 16, 2010 -- 2:59AM, Namchuck wrote:

Feb 8, 2010 -- 1:09PM, BBarton wrote:

Thank you, Serenity; blessed be!

Thank you, Shamanmystic.

Do you recall where he speaks of the redundancy of feeling feelings being akin to hearing sound, seeing a site, etc...?  These are senses not who we are, but what we experience; therefore, we are not the feeling, but the fealing is a sense to aid us.  -A language of Spirit all creation speaks.

 

 

You separate the thinker from the thought and the 'feeler' from the one who is feeling, BBarton?

Where is the justification for that?

i have several hundred links for lectures etc by watts.. might take me a couple of days to find it.. i'll look