| 12 months ago :: Jun 11, 2012 - 12:37AM #1 | |
|
Since everyone knows Human Rights Watch and Amnesty International (not to mention BBC and Al Jazeera) constantly display a Pro-Zionist, pro-American and pro-NATO bias... we should not be surprised at the claims against the Syrian government in these articles by these organizations that they saw fit to publish on their websites... Swift UN action needed on Syria after Houla assaultFrance: Exclude Syria’s Arms Supplier from Paris Arms Show The entire post is obviously sattire... |
|
|
Quick Reply
|
|
| 12 months ago :: Jun 11, 2012 - 1:14AM #2 | |
|
Oh, good - maybe NOW our contingent of 'humanitarian pacifists' will notice that it's Assad's bullies who have been murdering civilains by the thousands in Syria. I doubt that's going to impede the tsunami of invective over the purported 'deliberate targeting' of a building for being solar-powered, though. Evidently an empty building in Gaza is more important than the deaths of any number of Syrians - as long as thouse Syrians weren't allegedly killed by Israel or the US or NATO. |
|
|
Quick Reply
|
|
| 12 months ago :: Jun 11, 2012 - 11:29AM #3 | |
|
a recent post that was quickly edited blamed Houla on NATO SPEC OPS death squads... it was quickly replaced with more palatable generic accusations. |
|
|
Quick Reply
|
|