| 1 year ago :: Apr 17, 2012 - 4:44PM #11 | |
|
|
|
Quick Reply
|
|
| 1 year ago :: Apr 17, 2012 - 5:21PM #12 | |
|
|
|
Quick Reply
|
|
| 1 year ago :: Apr 17, 2012 - 5:25PM #13 | |
It seems to me that your mistaken. It was not because of Israel, but simply because they were Jewish. Wouldn't you agree? |
|
|
Quick Reply
|
|
| 1 year ago :: Apr 17, 2012 - 5:51PM #14 | |
|
Why do you think general Gantz of the IDF, whose weird statement is the topic of this thread, feels responsible for the welfare of Jews who are neither Israeli citizens nor live in Israel?
The responsibility for not raping, of course, actually lies with those who commit the rapes. The same is exactly true for the persecution of Jews. If Jews are persecuted -- the responsibility lies with those who persecute Jews. |
|
|
Quick Reply
|
|
| 1 year ago :: Apr 17, 2012 - 6:33PM #15 | |
This really belongs on World News & Politics. But for now, Dos, please provide a link to something that gives specificas about this Australian man being charged and, as you say, imprisoned. Rangerken
Conservative, Libertarian, Life member of the NRA and VFW
|
|
|
Quick Reply
|
|
| 1 year ago :: Apr 17, 2012 - 6:42PM #16 | |
|
Chari wrote: Why do you think general Gantz of the IDF, whose weird statement is the topic of this thread, feels responsible for the welfare of Jews who are neither Israeli citizens nor live in Israel?
Before there was an Israel, Jews had no one on whom they could rely for protection from either governmental actions or mob violence. As an often oppressed minority (even in our own land) Jews were voiceless and powerless against these forces. A strong and sovereign Israel is a signal to the world that, as the sayings go, "We are mad as hell and we are not going to take it anymore!" and/or "We are here - get used to it!" Only Israel has been able to rescue Jews and Jewish populations under threat around the world. No other country has done so or would do so. No other country would even think of doing so. We all know the sorry history of the "great democracies" in letting Jews go to their deaths for the "crime" of being Jewish. I would think that any European should know and understand this. But, perhaps, all the "feel good" pan-European post nationalism nonsense has robbed people of their historical knowledge and their good sense. |
|
|
Quick Reply
|
|
| 1 year ago :: Apr 17, 2012 - 7:48PM #17 | |
|
Point is, Israel is less and less acting strong and sovereign, Squirrel. Maybe those times can return when Netanyahu get ousted, but at the moment, I see the Israeli government as a pathetic actor enacting hollow stances. Yes, "safe haven" is the keyword. Not "securely gated community", which describes reality more accurately these days - and by mere onlooking suggests the added qualifier "...afraid of the evil, evil world outside". Part of the Israel project is counterproductive for Jews outside Israel. I don't say this to blame the victim, Shusha, but to describe reality - a purely descriptive statement. When a woman who dresses like a prostitute is raped, her dress does not exonerate the rapist, but it may help understand why the rape occurred, and help preclude future rapes. But then, some women may be more interested in their freedom to dress like a prostitute despite known danger.
tl;dr
|
|
|
Quick Reply
|
|
| 1 year ago :: Apr 18, 2012 - 2:04AM #18 | |
|
BD, If the Jews lived in perfect safety among the Muslims before the State of Israel was created, how do you explain the behavior toward the Jews on the part of the Almohads which took place about 700 years before the State of Israel came into existence? Habesor
Habesor
|
|
|
Quick Reply
|
|
| 1 year ago :: Apr 18, 2012 - 2:24AM #19 | |
|
Char, It seems to me that you are getting into the stance of someone who finds that no matter what Israel does, it is wrong. I suppose that if Israel was not cautious in its foreign policy you would be arguing that it was showing a high degree of arrogance in its behavior. Let me try to explain something about political behavior in general with the following example. During the American civil war the President was the highest elected official and the commander in chief of the Union army. However, President Lincoln was well aware that a civil war was extremely political in nature and managing the various generals running the Union Army was not a question of giving commands but of playing a very complex political game. Lincoln selected General Grant to be the military commander of all of the Union Armies. Despite outranking every other officer in that army, Grant realized that he had to be politically astute in order to successfully command his subordinates. (No matter how much the previous sentence has the characteristics of an oxymoron, it was the situation.) As one historian pointed out, there were times when both Lincoln and Grant had to carefully navigate through situations where they had the formal power to command action but never-the-less found it necessary to persuade subordinates. There were also times when they were able to act decisively and, using their formal powers, force their will on subordinates. Success depended on their ability to recognize correctly when those latter opportunities occurred and to act on them. The State of Israel, just like the USA and all other states, cannot use force or power to always get its way. The State of Israel sometimes has to act with a great deal of caution even when dealing with weaker national and international actors. Sometimes the State of Israel can use its power to get its way. Again the trick is to recognize the difference and act accordingly. Habesor PS - The relative success of the State of Israel compared to the failure of the Palestinians is more or less in the Israeli leadership's ability to recognize the difference and the Palestinian leadership's inability to recognize the difference.
Habesor
|
|
|
Quick Reply
|
|
| 1 year ago :: Apr 18, 2012 - 3:02AM #20 | |
|
Char, Re: protecting Jews at home and abroad I am writing the following as a Zionist. When the Zionist movement began, back in the 19th century, there were already different opinions within the movement about the nature of the "Jewish Problem". The early Zionists like Pinsker, Hess, Herzl and several others were very impressed by the contemporary "Scientific" analysis of society. They applied the same sort of analysis to the Jewish situation in Europe. I won't go into the complexities of these analyses but one element was the determination that anti-Semitism was caused by the Jews being an undefinable group within modern nationalistic society. It was argued that once the Jews had a modern state of their own, their position in western society would become recognizable and the fear of the Jew, which, they felt, caused anti-Semitism would come to an end. Over the years experience has shown this not to be the case. Indeed the early Zionists made precisely the same error as the early Jewish enlightenment/assimilationists who argued that once the Jews wore the same clothes, spoke the same language and modeled their religious institutions after the Christian Church, the fear of the other, on the part of their neighbors, would come to an end and the Jews could live alongside their Christian neighbors in peace. Both the Zionists and the assimilationists were wrong for the same reason; anti-Semitism was not caused by anything the Jews did or were, it was caused by the anti-Semites. We Zionists should not be surprised that Christian religion based anti-Jew ideology which morphed into anti-Semitism which was based on the bogus "science" of racism; has morphed once again into anti-Zionism which is based on bogus anti-Colonialism, bogus humanitarianism, bogus liberalism or bogus "scientific" socialism. Though this one aspect of Zionist ideology has proven woefully invalid, other aspects have, so far, proven valid. First and foremost is that a Jewish state can and does provide a safe haven for persecuted Jewish communities. Second that a Jewish state offers the opportunity, for the first time in a couple of thousand years, for a Jewish community to physically defend itself. We, in Israel, receive help from other states, especially American military aid, but we are not totally dependent on that help. Finally, Israel is the agent for Jews around the world to help each other. Israel received and absorbed millions of refugees. A good part of the resources used in that project came from Jews around the world who took on a major part of the financial burden involved in that humanitarian project. (This at a time when the Arabs were getting financial help from the UNRWA, a bogus humanitarian organization, to prevent the absorption of Arab refugees into their countries and keep them, penned up in refugee camps for generation after generation.) The difference between Jewish nationalism and Arab nationalism is that Jews love our own people more than we hate the Arabs, while the Arabs hate the Jews more than they love their own people. Strangely, there are anti-colonialist liberal leftist socialists who see this as a positive attribute of the Arabs. The comment by Benny Gantz simply reflected this aspect of the Zionist idea. Habesor
Habesor
|
|
|
Quick Reply
|
|