Post Reply
Page 5 of 6  •  Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next
Switch to Forum Live View Günter Grass declared persona non grata in Israel
1 year ago  ::  Apr 20, 2012 - 12:59PM #41
BDboy
Posts: 3,259

Apr 17, 2012 -- 5:31PM, rocketjsquirell wrote:


BDBOY


For centuries Jews were an oppressed minority in Arab and Muslim lands. They were subject to many indignities which were supported by the Muslim apartheid laws known as Dhimmi.


The Jews were deported from the Arab countries because they wwere Jews and because Israel committed the "unforgivable sin" of surviving the attack of the invading Arab armies. The Arab governments and the Arab Muslim populations could not deal with it, so they evicted their Jewish populations. Some of us are very familiar with the process. It wasn't a new process, stealing the lands and possessions of Jews was something that the Arabs had been doing since they emerged from Arabia. Sad but true.  





 


>>>>>>>>> I don't think I have said anything out of line here.


I said Jews lived with Arabs RELATIVELY well. When You compare how Jews were treated in Europe, Russia and some of central Asia, Arabs are used to have Jews around.


There were inter-faith "Love marriages" common among both communities. I know one of my uncle's family had a Jewish connection there.


You have to compare with rest of the world. When Jews were in major trouble after 1492 in southern Europe, Arabs gave them shelter as well.


I mean the Irish and the Brits were neighbors and fought with each others as well. Guess there were some irritation between Jewish and Muslim communities time to time. But if you take a look at the big picture JEWS did not face wholesale threats from any Muslim nations UNTIL state of Israel started violence against local non-Jewish population. Relationship became quite bad since that time.


There are quite a bit of valid criticism of how "Modern" state of Israel treats local "Native" non-jews as well.


The "Land stealing" technology was "Perfected" by the state of Israel when it uses the army and arms (Often gifted by the USA!) to grab more land from Palestinians.


I never supported oppression or deny it. But when you make a comment try to understand the context as well. Over 1000 years ago Muslims "Allowed" Jews to worship in Jerusalem while they were banned by Christians for centuries. It happened AFTER Muslims took over the city of Jerusalem!!


There are loads of positive interactions between Jews and Muslims. Part of it is "Natural" because we are VERY close in rituals. We are both monotheistic faiths. Many Western Muslims even consume Kosher food while they reject other type of food.


Finally, Arabs are in a mess. Most of the countries were ruled by ruthless dictators who were often treated fellow Muslims in worst ways (Saddam and senior Al-Assad killed thousads of Muslims in one day). They fought against each other (Iran-Iraq war) which caused over a million lives. So when you consider everything in the ME, Muslims and Jews used to have cordial relations (Not perfect but good).




 

Quick Reply
Cancel
1 year ago  ::  Apr 22, 2012 - 6:43AM #42
Dostojevsky
Posts: 4,728

Quote:


'There are still many Iranian Jews living in Iran. I bet you once Israelis decides to attack Iran, it will be most difficult for those innocent Jews. That is why I firmly feel Israeli fnatical policies are the biggest threat to the state of Israel. Not the rock thowering teen agers of Gaza....'


I certainly hope Israel will do the right thing and get their people out of Iran in time.  

Quick Reply
Cancel
1 year ago  ::  Apr 22, 2012 - 7:50AM #43
LeahOne
Posts: 14,488

Apr 22, 2012 -- 6:43AM, Dostojevsky wrote:


Quote:


'There are still many Iranian Jews living in Iran. I bet you once Israelis decides to attack Iran, it will be most difficult for those innocent Jews. That is why I firmly feel Israeli fnatical policies are the biggest threat to the state of Israel. Not the rock thowering teen agers of Gaza....'


I certainly hope Israel will do the right thing and get their people out of Iran in time.  




I for one am finding it necessary to wear hip-boots, it's gotten so deep.


So Dos considers Iranian Jews to be 'Israelis' and not Iranians.  Interesting.  So without actually ASKING a one of 25,000 people, Dos is *assuming* that for them, their religion trumps their nationality - in THEIR view. 


I understand the 'religion trumps nationality' being the view of the mullahs - but since when does a person decide such matters for others?


It's EXACTLY this kind of 'misunderstanding' which leads people to wonder if someone might have a 'bigotry' issue.....

Quick Reply
Cancel
1 year ago  ::  Apr 23, 2012 - 6:33PM #44
rocketjsquirell
Posts: 11,988

I had a hard time deciding whther to post this or not. On the one hand, it is past time for the whole Gunter Grass thing to go away. On the other hand, this article explains this in a new and interesting way.  I guess you already know how I decided. 



Part-time anti-Semites

Op-ed: Grass affair revealed the nature of most contemporary European anti-Semites

Manfred Gerstenfeld

“Guenter Grass, this big fish of letters, this turbot frozen by 60 years of posing and lies has finally decomposed,” wrote French philosopher Bernard Henri Levi. It is easy to fill an article with other quotes from the past weeks criticizing German Literature Nobel Prize winner and former Waffen SS member Guenter Grass. His defamatory poem about Israel is full of lies, of which the main one is that Israel intends to commit genocide on the Iranian people by launching atom bombs.

 
That Grass’ poem is anti-Semitic is not difficult to prove. One only has to place it next to the European Union’s definition of anti-Semitism to see that. Yet focusing on the hate poem’s content and on the many criticisms of it leaves a number of other substantial issues in the shadows.
. . .
The predominant type of European anti-Semite is the part-time one. It is a typical expression of contemporary society in which structures, attitudes and opinions have fragmented and many personalities are split.

 
Grass is a part-time anti-Semite. He demonizes Israel, yet claims in his poem that he’s a friend of Israel. However false that claim is, no full-time anti-Semite would take the trouble to say it.

 . . .

The Israeli government’s reactions illustrated once again the helplessness of the authorities in the propaganda war against the country. Not having analyzed it, nor having understood it, the authorities produce only ad hoc reactions to each new incident.

 
If there had to be any Israeli reaction at all, it should have been made by a low official who could have said: “When it was fashionable, Grass was a Nazi. When that became objectionable, he hid his past. He revealed it only late in his life, when little harm could be done to him. When it became fashionable to demonize Israel, he published his lies in poetry form.”

 

Finally there is the question - why did five major European papers publish an anti-Semitic poem? One must mention that the Italian Repubblica did so, yet published critical articles next to it. The answer to this seems simple because the German Suddeutsche Zeitung, the Spanish El Pais, the British The Guardian and the Danish Politiken are not contemporary mutations of the Nazi paper Der Stürmer. Like Grass, who is a part-time anti-Semitic poet, they are part-time anti-Semitic publications.

full article:
www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-42201...

Quick Reply
Cancel
1 year ago  ::  Apr 24, 2012 - 3:33AM #45
BDboy
Posts: 3,259

Apr 22, 2012 -- 7:50AM, LeahOne wrote:


Apr 22, 2012 -- 6:43AM, Dostojevsky wrote:


Quote:


'There are still many Iranian Jews living in Iran. I bet you once Israelis decides to attack Iran, it will be most difficult for those innocent Jews. That is why I firmly feel Israeli fnatical policies are the biggest threat to the state of Israel. Not the rock thowering teen agers of Gaza....'


I certainly hope Israel will do the right thing and get their people out of Iran in time.  




I for one am finding it necessary to wear hip-boots, it's gotten so deep.


So Dos considers Iranian Jews to be 'Israelis' and not Iranians.  Interesting.  So without actually ASKING a one of 25,000 people, Dos is *assuming* that for them, their religion trumps their nationality - in THEIR view. 


I understand the 'religion trumps nationality' being the view of the mullahs - but since when does a person decide such matters for others?


It's EXACTLY this kind of 'misunderstanding' which leads people to wonder if someone might have a 'bigotry' issue.....




 


>>>>>>>>> You have a point Leah.


I guess it varies person to person. I have seen few Jewish-American members in B-net, who said they feel Israel is their "Actual" home. Another member said all Jews are exile unless they are living in "Greater Israel"!!


So you are right in pointing that, for a non-Jewish person, it is not polite to assume all Jews are "Stuck with Israel". However the other point of of view (Which says except Israeli Jews all are exile) is ALSO a prominent "Jewish point of view".


Now going back to the point. It is almost certain lives of Iranian Jews will be difficult (To day the least) if Israel wants to engage in violence/war with Iran.


Just like after 9-11 many millions of innocent civilian Muslims had to learn to embrace a "New reality" and a "New normal" as parts of their lives. Their lives were not the same since then.


Guess we have to wait and see how things work out for all parties....

Quick Reply
Cancel
1 year ago  ::  Apr 24, 2012 - 4:32AM #46
NahumS
Posts: 1,551

I don't think any Israeli's are enthusiastic about an attack on Iran. If we were, it would have happened already. If it is carried out, it will only be done when the feeling is that there is no choice.


The Iranian threat is clear. They have been very open about their desire to wipe us off the map - and now they are gaining the capability to do so. That must be prevented, one way or another.


The question remains as to the repercussions for Israel and the region.


Naturally Iranian Jews feel empathy for their former neighbors. Many left Iran when Israel had good relations with the Shah's gov't, before fanatical Islamic forces took over.


On the other hand, seen in historical perspective, Jewish life in Iran over the centuries was hardly idyllic. Pogroms and forced conversion (in Meshad,  for example) were not unknown - and not so very different from eastern Europe. Like in many places, persecution of Jews had its ebbs and flows, sometimes better and sometimes worse.


While the Holocaust took place in Europe, Muslims were involved as well. The Mufti of Jerusalem, Haj Amin al Husseini,  was an ardent supporter of Hitler and the "Final Solution" and recruited Bosnian Serbs to aid the Nazis murder Jews. Most of the Arab regimes were pro-German. A recent book "Among the Righteous" details how some Muslims risked their lives to save Jews in North Africa when the Nazis occupied those countries. Fairly parallell to Europe.


Ultimately, that is the story of the Jewish people in the Diaspora. Vulnerability, bouts of persecution interspersed with beneficence, flare-ups of violence.


As to G.G. - Israel's response was heavy-handed and stupid. His Nazi past should have been pointed out and his fashionable anti-Israel sentiments ridiculed. Banning him from the country was counter-productive and inappropriate. I doubt if anyone here would have invited him to speak here in a university or literary setting, and that would have been enough. His own idiocy would marginalize him.

Quick Reply
Cancel
1 year ago  ::  Apr 24, 2012 - 8:54AM #47
Dostojevsky
Posts: 4,728

Quote Leah:


'So Dos considers Iranian Jews to be 'Israelis' and not Iranians.  Interesting.  So without actually ASKING a one of 25,000 people, Dos is *assuming* that for them, their religion trumps their nationality - in THEIR view.'


- in response to:


'I certainly hope Israel will do the right thing  and get their people out of Iran on time'. post 43


Leah, are you saying that for Israel, Iranian Jews are not 'their' people?

Quick Reply
Cancel
1 year ago  ::  Apr 24, 2012 - 9:50AM #48
LeahOne
Posts: 14,488

No, I'm saying that the Iranian government and the people of Iran are responsible for their own actions **no matter what anyone else's choices may be**  


And that if the Iranians choose to use some Israeli action to abuse their Jewish citizens, that they would be guilty of Jew-killing hate. 


It goes to the whole 'divided loyalties' canard which is implicit in the accusations such as Helen Thomas made - accusations which you and only one other poster here have treated in any way as even POSSIBLY worthy of consideration.


 


 

Quick Reply
Cancel
1 year ago  ::  Apr 24, 2012 - 10:09AM #49
LeahOne
Posts: 14,488

You have to compare with rest of the world. When Jews were in major trouble after 1492 in southern Europe, Arabs gave them shelter as well.


Er, 'the Jews were in major trouble'???   Nice language there:  the FACT is the Spanish Crown imposed the death penalty on any Jew remaining in Spain.  That is attempted genocide, not simply 'major trouble'.  And there has never been any suggestion that the Jewish community in any way did something to 'provoke' this action. 


I mean the Irish and the Brits were neighbors and fought with each others as well.


I guess you'll have to wait for one of the Irish folks to come along and explain the kind of distorted filth that sentence represents.  A few phrases for you to look up and learn from:  'beyond the pale', 'boycott', and 'coffin ship'. 


It's good, though - I can see your grasp of history is fairly tenuous in more than jsut one area.  So that suggests ignorance, which is curable : ))


 


 Guess there were some irritation between Jewish and Muslim communities time to time.


Yeah, like the reason Maimonides moved from Spain to Egypt to being with..... 


 


But if you take a look at the big picture JEWS did not face wholesale threats from any Muslim nations UNTIL state of Israel started violence against local non-Jewish population. Relationship became quite bad since that time.


Damascus 1840:  Damascus 1929.  And those are NOT isolated incidents, just two of the larger ones.  We could also mention Hebron 1929.....  And ALL of that well before there ever was a State of Israel.



There are quite a bit of valid criticism of how "Modern" state of Israel treats local "Native" non-jews as well.



There absolutely is - but the accusations you keep repeating are not valid criticism.  After all, just being an Arab doesn't make one 'native' to the land.  Or else over 50
% of Jewish Israelis are 'native'  because they're Sephardi or Mizrachi.....  not counting the sabras.


The "Land stealing" technology was "Perfected" by the state of Israel when it uses the army and arms (Often gifted by the USA!) to grab more land from Palestinians.


Unsubstantiated allegations which include a none-too-subtle attack on the US as well, AND the unspoken insinuation that this is due to 'undue Jewish influence' - the lie about 'divided loyalties', etc.


I never supported oppression or deny it. But when you make a comment try to understand the context as well. Over 1000 years ago Muslims "Allowed" Jews to worship in Jerusalem while they were banned by Christians for centuries. It happened AFTER Muslims took over the city of Jerusalem!!


And today, Dr Zahi Hawass whores for HAMAS as does the Waqf, declaring the lie that no Jewish Temple ever stood on the Temple Mount.  That current obscenity doesn't invalidate the earlier decency of Muslim rulers.  But I suppose that the HAMAS whores will rewrite the history of a thousand years ago as well - unless the honest Muslims stop them.


Quick Reply
Cancel
1 year ago  ::  Apr 24, 2012 - 3:41PM #50
BDboy
Posts: 3,259

Apr 24, 2012 -- 9:50AM, LeahOne wrote:


No, I'm saying that the Iranian government and the people of Iran are responsible for their own actions **no matter what anyone else's choices may be**  


And that if the Iranians choose to use some Israeli action to abuse their Jewish citizens, that they would be guilty of Jew-killing hate. 


It goes to the whole 'divided loyalties' canard which is implicit in the accusations such as Helen Thomas made - accusations which you and only one other poster here have treated in any way as even POSSIBLY worthy of consideration.


 


 




 


>>>>>>> The "Divided loyalties" comments came from JEWISH members here. I think Helen Thomas is not Jewish.


If Israel decides to bomb Iran, it is certain Jewish lives in Iran will bear an impact. As I said lives of Muslim Americans "Impacted" since 9-11. Albeit they had NOTHING to do with it.


Not debating you or anyone about what Iran should do (Iran should try to protect all her citizens) but Iran is not as organized as USA or UK. Considering recent events, Jewish lives in Iran will never be the same IF Israel decides to attack Iran.

Quick Reply
Cancel
Page 5 of 6  •  Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next
 
    Viewing this thread :: 0 registered and 1 guest
    No registered users viewing
    Advertisement

    Beliefnet On Facebook