What was the point of them calling themselves "Muslims" if every aspect of their life had been unislamized over the last few centuries?
Perhaps it is a cry for 'back to basics'.
I thought exactly the same thing! The only way for a society to be "Islamized" is to allow each person to decide for themselves what religion to practice, how to practice or whether to practice. No compulsion in religion is Allah's way, but you'd have to know Islam to know that.
Of course!
If you do not know much about Islam, you can easily call it Islamism.
I know one thing: There are a billion Islamic people in the world today, and there will be about 2 billion by the time we're dead. They're not going to give up their religion. (Chris Matthews)
No compulsion in religion may be Allah's way, but it is not the way of the Islamists such as the Muslim Brotherhood (a.k.a. whatever we are calling them today - yesterday it was "nut jobs") and it has historically not been the way of Arab Muslim ruled areas where forced conversions were (and still are) commonplace. If you look at the two main contenders for most "Muslim" country, KSA and Iran you will find that compulsion in religion and forced conformity to "Islamic" standards is the rule, not the exception.
"Forced conversions" (an oxymoron if there ever was one) are not commonplace in Arab ruled areas. Between the two of us, you're the only one that calls Iran and the KSA "Islamic".
The thing is both the KSA and Iran certainly do claim to be Islamic.
So does Pakistan. Her real name is Islamic Republic of Pakistan. USA has been friendly with both KSA and IRP. I see that USA has never complained about these countries being "Islamic". What is the problem with Egypt being "Islamic"?
So if a Muslim says that neither is 'Islamic' then the obvious question is, what exactly is 'Islamic'?
An Islamic country is a country that upholds Islamic values; no corruption, no human rights abuses, is against murder, against killing of innocent persons, no torture, no imprisonment without trial, live in peace even with non-Muslims, be honest in politics, if you see a purse on a bench in a park, don't take it away (it does not belong to you), the owner will come back and take it away, have a welfare system for poor, sick and needy. This list is much longer. Suicide bombing is not part of it.
My position is that if a Muslim country says that it is 'Is;lamic' then it damn well IS 'Islamic' BUT, it defines 'Islamic' in its own way.
How does Pakistan define herself Islamic? I am sure this "Muslim country" says that it is "Islamic" and every other country is accepting it blindly without even trying to understand whether it is true or not. The same goes for suicide bombers. They are blindly accepted as Muslim when their act is not Islamic at all.
And this is a great example of why political Islam most certaily does exist.
I see no sign of "political Islam" in any example in these countries. "Political Islam" is being defined in different ways because it does not exist in reality; only in peoples' imagination. Everyone can see the word "Islam" in it and Islam has been seen in all sorts of ways in the last few decades. Some see Islam in "Islamic", others in "Islamism". Some see it in "Islamist" and others in "Islamization". Some see it in "Islamic terrorists" and others in "Islamic terrorism". Strangely, many see Islam in even "unislamic". The list is always growing as the old labels lose their impact and new labels are invented. "Political Islam" is probably the latest brainwave. It is a brainwave of a secular politician for foreign consumption.
And how 'political Islam' operates does impact the politics of the whole, Middle East.
Without the 'political Judaism' there would be no birth of 'political Islam' in the whole of the Middle East. We had never even heard about it before 1948.
I know one thing: There are a billion Islamic people in the world today, and there will be about 2 billion by the time we're dead. They're not going to give up their religion. (Chris Matthews)
No compulsion in religion may be Allah's way, but it is not the way of the Islamists such as the Muslim Brotherhood (a.k.a. whatever we are calling them today - yesterday it was "nut jobs") and it has historically not been the way of Arab Muslim ruled areas where forced conversions were (and still are) commonplace. If you look at the two main contenders for most "Muslim" country, KSA and Iran you will find that compulsion in religion and forced conformity to "Islamic" standards is the rule, not the exception.
"Forced conversions" (an oxymoron if there ever was one) are not commonplace in Arab ruled areas. Between the two of us, you're the only one that calls Iran and the KSA "Islamic".
The thing is both the KSA and Iran certainly do claim to be Islamic. So if a Muslim says that neither is 'Islamic' then the obvious question is, what exactly is 'Islamic'? My position is that if a Muslim country says that it is 'Is;lamic' then it damn well IS 'Islamic' BUT, it defines 'Islamic' in its own way.
And this is a great example of why political Islam most certaily does exist. And how 'political Islam' operates does impact the politics of the whole, Middle East.
For good or bad how "Political Islam" operates also impacts how Islam is viewed by both Muslims and non-Muslims, how Islam is practiced by Muslims, and how Islam interacts with other religions and belief systems.
Now if that does not tell anyone that it is Islam that is being talked about on MENP board then I may as well call my religion "Your Islam" or "MENP Islam". The definition given here will fit any size.
I am sure there are many "Islamic Experts" on this board. Any idea how "My Islam" is operating here?
I know one thing: There are a billion Islamic people in the world today, and there will be about 2 billion by the time we're dead. They're not going to give up their religion. (Chris Matthews)
I am an expert in growing tomatoes. I really am. I can examine a tomato plant and tell you whether or not it received too little, too much or the right amount of water. I can tell if its roots are healthy or are being attacked by any of the fungi that assault tomato plant roots. I can examine the leaves and identify bacteria, fungal and pest caused damage. I can tell you none of this by examining tomato sauce in the can or tomato Ketchup in the bottle, though I can evaluate many important things about those products. I can tell that in the main they are made of tomatoes.
A discussion about political Islam is or should be very much like this. We can examine political Islam in its many forms and talk about each one. None of this tells us very much about Islam except that political Islam politicians and leaders say they draw their inspiration from Islam. Political Islam is the bottled or canned version of Islam just as tomato sauce and Ketchup is the bottled and canned version of tomatoes. As I said we can discuss political Islam and know that it is based on Islam but we cannot tell anything about Islam from an analysis of political Islam.
'Without the 'political Judaism' there would be no birth of 'political Islam' in the whole of the Middle East. We had never even heard about it before 1948. '
And without 'political Christianity' there wouldn't have been Inquisition, and a lot of contribution to other wars including today. If all Christians around the world united in the spiritual quest for loving the neighbor as oneself, there'd be no wars***
ps Actually I should correct myself; without 'politicized Christianity' and the same would go for 'politicized Judaism' and 'politicized Islam'.
All religions have been smeared with slime seeping from another world.
Where there's greatest good, the greatest evil wants to attack it.
I am an expert in growing tomatoes. I really am. I can examine a tomato plant and tell you whether or not it received too little, too much or the right amount of water. I can tell if its roots are healthy or are being attacked by any of the fungi that assault tomato plant roots. I can examine the leaves and identify bacteria, fungal and pest caused damage. I can tell you none of this by examining tomato sauce in the can or tomato Ketchup in the bottle, though I can evaluate many important things about those products. I can tell that in the main they are made of tomatoes.
Habesor,
We have something in common. I do buy tomato sauce and tomato ketchup as well as grow tomatoes. Without a label, you would not know that it is tomato sauce or tomato ketchup if you did not know tomatoes.
A discussion about political Islam is or should be very much like this. We can examine political Islam in its many forms and talk about each one.
As I expected, when it comes to talking about "political Islam" it can have "many" forms. How many? Any number will fit the size as there is no limit to man's imagination.
None of this tells us very much about Islam except that political Islam politicians and leaders say they draw their inspiration from Islam.
I can join politics and tell you that I draw my inspiration from Judaism. Would you blindly accept that I draw my inspiration from Judaism or would you care to verify it somehow?
As I said we can discuss political Islam and know that it is based on Islam but we cannot tell anything about Islam from an analysis of political Islam.
Exactly! I say that by linking it to Islam, without knowing Islam, people do not know whether it is "political Islam" or "political Judaism".
I like to give credit where the credit is due. It was an original try.
From my point of view, I know quite a lot about tomatoes to know the difference when I am given a jar full of mango chutney with a tomato sauce label on.
I know one thing: There are a billion Islamic people in the world today, and there will be about 2 billion by the time we're dead. They're not going to give up their religion. (Chris Matthews)
'Without the 'political Judaism' there would be no birth of 'political Islam' in the whole of the Middle East. We had never even heard about it before 1948. '
And without 'political Christianity' there wouldn't have been Inquisition, and a lot of contribution to other wars including today. If all Christians aropund the world united in the spiritual quest for loving the neigbor as oneself, there'd be no wars***
Spot on! If there can be "political Islam" then why not "political Judaism" in creation of State of Israel and why not "political Christianity" when GWB declared CRUSADE (war on terror) with "God bless America"?
I know one thing: There are a billion Islamic people in the world today, and there will be about 2 billion by the time we're dead. They're not going to give up their religion. (Chris Matthews)
Now if that does not tell anyone that it is Islam that is being talked about on MENP board then I may as well call my religion "Your Islam" or "MENP Islam". The definition given here will fit any size.
Let's call it "McIslam", as in McDonald's catchy jingle "Have it your way, have it your way!".
Of course, that not only makes it unIslamic, it's also unreligion.
Disclaimer: The opinions of this member are not primarily informed by western ethnocentric paradigms, stereotypes rooted in anti-Muslim/Islam hysteria, "Israel can do no wrong" intransigence, or the perceived need to protect the Judeo-Christian world from invading foreign religions and legal concepts. By expressing such views, no inherent attempt is being made to derail or hijack threads, but that may be the result. The result is not the responsibility of this member.
Now if that does not tell anyone that it is Islam that is being talked about on MENP board then I may as well call my religion "Your Islam" or "MENP Islam". The definition given here will fit any size.
Let's call it "McIslam", as in McDonald's catchy jingle "Have it your way, have it your way!".
There are so many version of Islam, even the canned version, "McIslam" would be appropriate for a time because it may sound catchy to some. It would never be called "McIslam" in Makkah even though they have McDonald's there because it would sound so daft there. They might call it "Islamic Big Mac". Most posters on this board will see "Islam" in it but those who understand Islam will see "halal" in it rather than a version of Islam.
I know one thing: There are a billion Islamic people in the world today, and there will be about 2 billion by the time we're dead. They're not going to give up their religion. (Chris Matthews)
What I see as a disconnect...or rather people talking past each other albeit with the best of intentions... revolves around the obvious fact (to me anyway) that non-Muslims, in general, have an entirely different appreciation of what Islam is than Muslims. I definitely see Islam as something more than a religion, but rather an economic and political system and the latter two things are what bothers me and has always bothered me, because I have a visceral, instinctive dislike of, and antipathy towards ANY religion being involved in anything outside the spiritual realm. This includes my own religion and also my wife's (Mary Clare is Roman Catholic as is about 50% of our extended family) and all other religions that members of our family follow (which includes various protestant denominations, maybe 45% and a few Reform and Conservative Jews, maybe 5%). So whenever I see ANY religion commenting on politics, much less having or desiring any secular authority, I internally cringe. Anyone who has read my posts over the years I've been on Beliefnet, going back over ten yeas, knows this about me. And I believe that religion, specifically 'political Islam' is the cause of much conflict in the Middle East...and world in general... and also a reason for much of the conflict between Israel andd its Muslim neighbors.
What's going on in Egypt is, to me, a perfect example of political Islam messing things up, and of course what the Saudis do and what is done in Iran in the name of Islam I find repulsive. Now it's fine for Muslims to say none of those three examples are 'real Islam', and I won't argue because not being a Muslim I willingly defer to Muslims when it comes to defining their own eligion. BUT, there is no escaping the fact that the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt, the Wahabis in Saudi Arabia, and the Mullahs in Iran all claim that they are following and are seeking to impose their understanding of and belief in Islam as the basis for government and life in all respects. And that, ladies and gentlemen, is, to me, and many others, indeed 'political Islam' at work. And that, again in my opinion, explains much of what I think is wrong in the Middle East.
Ken
Conservative, Libertarian, Life member of the NRA and VFW