Mar 3, 2012 -- 11:38PM, aarroottoonn wrote:

Mar 3, 2012 -- 7:01AM, Kwinters wrote:

www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3096434/#46598619


Asserting that women need vaginal probes before having access to a legal medical procedure or blanketing all women on contraception 'sluts' and 'prostitutes' will result in another Obama term.

Your vaginal probes are part of the standard procedure conducted by Planned Parenthood before any abortion, so I don't think that is going to move anyone one way or the other.

What the HELL are you talking about?  Why do people think they can get away with spouting utter bs?

Or are you just that ignorant?

"To the people who are upset about their hard-earned tax money going to things they don't like: Welcome to the f*cking club. Reimburse me for the Iraq war and oil subsidies, and diaphragms are on me!"

-Jon Stewart

Mar 5, 2012 -- 9:45PM, aarroottoonn wrote:

It isn't utter bs, it is fact. PP does an ultrasound, and that is how they do it.

www.lifenews.com/2012/02/22/planned-pare...

You can also go to PP to find out information about ultrasounds, both abdomen and vaginal.

How many people here can tell the difference between an ultrasound done diagnostic purposes, and one intended to induce feelings of guilt in women seeking to terminate a pregnancy?

*raises hand*

It's not the ultra-sound that is objectionable, it's requiring abortion providers to treat women as mentally incompetant, unable to understand what's going on in an abortion, and thus must sit through an optional procedure used to give expectant mothers early pictures and sounds of their potential offspring.

If an ultrasound is deemed a necessary precursor to a surgical procedure by the provider, that is one thing.  But what certain state legislatures are doing is very different.

Mar 3, 2012 -- 12:02PM, Ed.W wrote:

Mar 3, 2012 -- 11:46AM, Unworthyone wrote:

I stand corrected!  It was Stephanopoulos who started the partisan "investigation" of Planned Parenthood.  And it was he who was behind the decision to cut off funding by Korman. And it was Stephanopoulos who got the bishops to feign outrage.  And he was responsible for passing laws requiring women to be vaginally probed.  And is was Stephanopoulos, not Rick Santorum, who declared "contraception is not OK."  And is was he, not Limbaugh who called that young woman "a slut" for daring to stand up and testifying before congress. /sarcasm

"Earth to Ed ... Come in Ed"

You shouldn't even try to speak for women on this.  Maybe you should try your ears and hear what women have to say and think about this climate, since it's obvious you're with the good ol' boys.

I wish more women would make the sacrifices to raise our sons into men who can partner rather than chattel women!  Same goes for the women of the ME.  Our lack of representation shows in the way the world is run.  And these men who can neither empathize with us, nor respect us need to be voted out regardless of what party they crawled out of. 

It's Congress' job to investigate malfeasance.  The PP investigation was not the beginning of this current BC issue. 

Nice try at changing the subject though. 

Stephanopolous was simply laying the groundwork for Obama.  And now you are claiming that Republicans are attacking contraception.  Unfortunately your false accusation didn't hold up.  This is where you'd say yeah you're right, but that would take humility, so just shutting up is your next best option.  However I'm sure that you will continue to make yourself look foolish.

All we are doing is defending an attack on religious freedom from the usual suspects.

The GOP simply is looking out for the best interest of women.  Afterall, how can anyone expect that a female is capable of making her on decisions without a man being involved.  After all it is not like women are equal to men.  How can women know what they should think if older white males don't tell them?

Rep Issa knew that women would have nothing to contribute that is why he did not include any on his list of those testifying before his recent investigative panel.  It really does not matter whether the focus was contraception or religious freedom.

And, obviously Sandra Fluke has no business suggesting that her opinion carrys any weight.  What does she think she is a man?

what right does Sandra Fluke or any female have to take offense to the comments of Rush Limbaugh.  Of course any female who gets uppity must be demonized of in this case slutified.

The problem started when females were given the right to own property and then vote.  See where this has brought us. Perhaps if we all rally behind Santorum we can reverse these mistakes.

I think it is pretty obvious that if God wanted females to be equal, "He" would have made them males.

/sarcasm