|
4 months ago ::
Feb 11, 2012 - 9:50PM
#14
|
|
|
Maybe what ya need is a little Frisbee civil disobedience, bet you could get several thousand or so and call it the world's largest Frisbee throw.
You've got to be careful with that civil disobedience you may get the harmless Armwar pepper sprayed!
Christianity: Seeking an END to religion, one decision at a time.
|
|
|
|
4 months ago ::
Feb 11, 2012 - 7:50PM
#13
|
|
|
Maybe what ya need is a little Frisbee civil disobedience, bet you could get several thousand or so and call it the world's largest Frisbee throw.
Wise men still seek him.
|
|
|
|
4 months ago ::
Feb 11, 2012 - 7:02PM
#12
|
|
|
Your thread may yet have a slight pulse. I've got you a plate in the oven if not.
Christianity: Seeking an END to religion, one decision at a time.
|
|
|
|
4 months ago ::
Feb 09, 2012 - 11:40PM
#11
|
|
|
darn, I killed my own thread! ok, then lets go back to yes it is, no its not... liberals often write such facacta legislation! as was the case in LA. No farting in the confined quarters of public elevators! thousand dollar fine, and social ostrization, but may apply for exception to the mandate...
|
|
|
|
4 months ago ::
Feb 09, 2012 - 1:15PM
#10
|
|
|
In what states are you allowed to own an alligator and take him or her for a walk?
|
|
|
|
4 months ago ::
Feb 09, 2012 - 1:11PM
#9
|
|
|
I think I could work that alligator thing into a song...like Jim Croce's...don't step on superman's cape, don't spit in the wind, don't tie your alligator to a fire hydrant, and you don't mess aroung with Jim?
|
|
|
|
4 months ago ::
Feb 09, 2012 - 12:54PM
#8
|
|
|
The US SC ruling on governments being able to up and take your property and give it to a private enterprise comes to mind!
That did suck. What was the rationale for that? Checking on that myself, the rationale is a certain price can make anyone whole. They felt like she was compensated, and one patch of dirt under your house is as good as another, and the good of the community was also satisfied. I don't agree with it. I think they should only do it for public use--even a park-- but not private use. The city eventually agreed to move Susette Kelo's house to a new location and to pay substantial additional compensation to other homeowners. The redeveloper was unable to obtain financing and abandoned the redevelopment project, leaving the land as an empty lot,[2] which was eventually turned into a dump by the city.
So ultimately, it did become public use.
Christianity: Seeking an END to religion, one decision at a time.
|
|
|
|
4 months ago ::
Feb 09, 2012 - 12:45PM
#7
|
|
|
The US SC ruling on governments being able to up and take your property and give it to a private enterprise comes to mind!
|
|
|
|
4 months ago ::
Feb 09, 2012 - 12:44PM
#6
|
|
|
Read the link, and I have to agree with the second comment that was made:
This is what you get when you keep electing Democrats who are bent on controlling every aspect of our lives. They want to control what we eat, where we live, what we drive, where we go, what we do when we get there, where we work, how much we are paid, how long we can work. How much we weigh, games we play, soon they’ll send us a itinerary for each day. We’ve lost our freedom. How do you like Obama now?
Guess you stopped reading beyond that comment.
Just a little bit futhe down from the above comment, someone posted this: "J Graham
Out here in Iowa, a 100% REPUBLICAN Board of Supervisors passed a 100 page zoning ordinance in a rural county of 20,000 people AFTER receiving 1500 signatures in opposition. It includes language making it illegal to post 2 signs in your yard to sell your house among a lot of other nanny state garbage.
|
|
|
|
4 months ago ::
Feb 09, 2012 - 12:44PM
#5
|
|
|
You are probably right about that one...I don't think I will try civil disobedience on it...It does make one wonder about the necessity of the law, the story behind it!
|
|
|
