| 2 years ago :: Sep 29, 2011 - 8:33PM #1 | |
|
This week PBS' science series "Nova" is premiering two documentaries about the disasters that hit Japan this past spring--the earthquake(s), the tsunamis(s) and the nuclear plant disasters. and rhe other one is titled ""Surviving the Tsunami." They are both highly informative both in terms of scientific info and human reactons/devastation and economic consequences.
EDIT: added links
Moderated by
Beliefnet_community
on Sep 29, 2011 - 10:04PM
|
|
|
Quick Reply
|
|
| 2 years ago :: Sep 29, 2011 - 11:49PM #2 | |
|
Star--thanks for the links, I don't know why my computer refuses to let me access that page--as I mentioned in my post. |
|
|
Quick Reply
|
|
| 2 years ago :: Sep 30, 2011 - 12:19PM #3 | |
|
I'll keep this near the top for a bit for anyone who might be interested in these amazing documentaries. |
|
|
Quick Reply
|
|
| 2 years ago :: Sep 30, 2011 - 3:31PM #4 | |
|
These two videos, linked to in the OP, are superb and well worth watching. They are, frankly, more than a little frightening. Great thread and deserving of attention! This will undoubtably end up on the Enviromental Issues forum after it has run its course on Hot topics...perhaps also on World news & Politics. But for now, it definitely deserves our attention here even though it is no longer timely regarding the acytal earthquake and tsunami date in March. That is because the PBS programs that are linked didn't air until recently so they are indeed timely! Rangerken, co-host
Conservative, Libertarian, Life member of the NRA and VFW
|
|
|
Quick Reply
|
|
| 2 years ago :: Sep 30, 2011 - 4:12PM #5 | |
|
I saw one of these- I believe it was "Surviving the Tsunami". The live footage was frightening indeed. But one thing which struck me was this. In spite of what must have be one of the most advanced tsunami warning systems around, and in spite of detailed response/evacuation plans: - People missed the warning. - The effects were miscalculated (the water came far further inland in one area- Sendai plain, as I recall) than was thought possible. - And serious mistakes were made. A number of school children were moved from the third floor of their school to the ground floor gym, because it was thought the threat was over. Wrong: fortunately one parent saw the incoming water in time to move the kids back to safety.
When dealing with nature- no plans are foolproof.
|
|
|
Quick Reply
|
|
| 2 years ago :: Sep 30, 2011 - 4:48PM #6 | |
|
Templar--I agree. Even the town with the 30 foot concrete barrier couldn't stop the tsunami..... I wonder that the Japanese still live on that terribly dangerous island chain between the earthquakes and the volcanoes and the tsunamis. Imagine how many lives have been lost over rhe course of Japanese history. |
|
|
Quick Reply
|
|
| 2 years ago :: Sep 30, 2011 - 5:21PM #7 | |
People are like that. They rebuilt San Francisco, didn't they, even though those people had a whole continent in which to relocate. Anyhow, where would the Japanese go? |
|
|
Quick Reply
|
|
| 2 years ago :: Sep 30, 2011 - 7:39PM #8 | |
|
The problem today with natural disasters is that with a growing population in areas prone to them we're going to see more and more similar tragedies. Now planning for how to deal with them is really a major responsibility for any govbernment. It will be instructive, I think, to follow how the Japanese handle this. They certainly have the history and experience, and to say the least the motivation. They also have the wherewithall to do it which is important. Watching those videos causes one to think about how we/they would react to a similar disaster in our backyard. Ken
Conservative, Libertarian, Life member of the NRA and VFW
|
|
|
Quick Reply
|
|
| 2 years ago :: Oct 01, 2011 - 4:24AM #9 | |
Nowhere is as safe as we'd like, as we're all aware, but I agree that it does seem foolish to have rebuilt San Francisco when there was a vast territory with many safer areas for a city. But then, perhaps people didn't know that future catastrophic quakes were more likely than not there. We know so much more today about the conditions that result in more severe earthquakes in some places than others. Another similar issue in the U.S. is people building homes in areas that periodically are subject to disaster such as the areas prone to mudslides or wildfires in California. That is somewhat more foolish, I'd say, since the frequency of mudslides and wildfires is much greater than that of major earthquakes. But much of what people do doesn't make a great deal of sense... |
|
|
Quick Reply
|
|
| 2 years ago :: Oct 01, 2011 - 7:24PM #10 | |
Quite the opposite; there had been a major quake in the Bay area 40 years before the '06 quake, and the area was known to be prone to quakes (a good read on the '06 quake is "A Crack in the Edge of the World" by Simon Winchester). But as usual (see: global warming debate of the late 20th/early 21st century), economic interests prevailed. |
|
|
Quick Reply
|
|