Advertisement
 
Post Reply
Volcanic vs. Anthropogenic CO2
10 months ago  ::  Aug 28, 2011 - 4:02AM #3
Karma_yeshe_dorje
Posts: 7,867

At issue for the denialists, is fatalism. "There's nothing you can do; give up!". I would like to imagine that there might be something that one could do, to lessen bad effects.

Quick Reply
Cancel
10 months ago  ::  Aug 21, 2011 - 9:31AM #2
JRT
Posts: 271

Just in case no-one noticed, the term "two orders of magnitude" does not mean 'two times' greater but rather 'one hundred times' greater.

the floggings will continue until morale improves
Quick Reply
Cancel
10 months ago  ::  Aug 20, 2011 - 12:42PM #1
JRT
Posts: 271

A common claim made by anthropogenic  global warming denialists is that volcanic CO2 emissions far exceed human-caused emissions. The data is now in that this is a spurious claim: 

www.realclimate.org/index.php/archives/2...



The bottom line? Annual anthropogenic CO2 emissions exceed annual volcanic CO2 by two orders of magnitude, and probably exceed the CO2 output of one or more super-eruptions.  Super-eruptions are extremely rare, with recurrence intervals of 100,000–200,000 years; none have occurred historically, the most recent examples being Indonesia’s Toba volcano, which erupted 74,000 years ago, and the United States’ Yellowstone caldera, which erupted 2 million years ago.

the floggings will continue until morale improves
Quick Reply
Cancel
Post Reply
 
    Viewing this thread :: 0 registered and 1 guest
    No registered users viewing
    Advertisement

    Beliefnet On Facebook