Isn't "WikiLeaks" going to at least TRY to "hack" The British Supreme Court WebSite ahead of Time ... ???

May 25, 2012 -- 1:01PM, Karma_yeshe_dorje wrote:

Access to the Supreme Court building on Wednesday 30 May.

The court building will open to the public from 0815 on the day; the judgment itself will be given at 0915.

The ‘handing-down’ of the judgment will take around ten minutes. The President of the Supreme Court will give a summary of the point of law raised by the appeal, the Court’s decision, and a brief explanation of the rationale for that decision. After the judges have left the courtroom, the judgment will be published online (along with a press summary) and printed copies of the judgment will be made available from the Reception area.

Please note that, in line with the Court's usual practice, items of clothing or other materials bearing messages that undermine the dignity of the court or which seek to interfere with the proper administration of justice will not be permitted into the building.

The Court will also strictly enforce a prohibition on photography or filming within the building, and visitors are discouraged from bringing such equipment with them.

It would also assist efficient reception of visitors if those seeking access to the building brought as little luggage as possible and were prepared for an airport-style security scan upon arrival.

www.supremecourt.gov.uk/news/julian-assa...

The Secretary of Newcastle Trades Hall, speaks strongly in favour of our honourable hero, Julian Assange!

Upset feminist.

It is on the same spectrum of control: the will to gag Bradley Manning or Julian Assange also seek to gag a medical provider in South Dakota. The same impulse to peer into personal emails and listen to private phone calls that has led the NSA to pour billions into surveillancestations in Utah, is the same impulse of panopticon state control that wants to get between the sheets of men and women in consensual sexual decision-making, and monitor or restrict their access to condoms and contraception.

www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/cifamer...

***Is this a Bit of exceedingly odd Hypocrisy ... ???

Julian Assange is (irresponsibly) continuing to resist going back to Sweden, where he reportedly Sexually Abused TWO Swedish Women by (1) penetrating Sexual Intercourse with a Women without her Consent (she was unconscious) and (2) Sexual Intercourse without a Condom without the Woman's Consent, thus exposing her without her Consent to Julian Assange's Body Fluid ...

I don't know of ANY "Feminist" ANYWHERE who would approve of THAT Behavior ...

May 26, 2012 -- 9:50AM, Karma_yeshe_dorje wrote:

Upset feminist.

It is on the same spectrum of control: the will to gag Bradley Manning or Julian Assange also seek to gag a medical provider in South Dakota. The same impulse to peer into personal emails and listen to private phone calls that has led the NSA to pour billions into surveillancestations in Utah, is the same impulse of panopticon state control that wants to get between the sheets of men and women in ***consensual sexual decision-making, and monitor or restrict their access to condoms and contraception.

www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/cifamer...

Countdown

to

Extradition ... and Justice ...