| 12 months ago :: Jun 22, 2012 - 6:45PM #481 | |
|
Chari The Terrorists on the Mavi Marmara knew precisely what they were doing. They were not naive. Some of the people on the other ships were naive useful idiots, but nothing happened to them, so no apology is necessary. Similarly the IHH and the government of Turkey are not naive and they also knew that they were staging an attack on Israel. So no apology from Israel is necessary. One from Turkey is. I am not holding my breath. |
|
|
Quick Reply
|
|
| 12 months ago :: Jun 22, 2012 - 7:53PM #482 | |
|
I don't speak about terrorists. It's hopeless to speak at all when nobody even tries to understand you.
tl;dr
|
|
|
Quick Reply
|
|
| 12 months ago :: Jun 22, 2012 - 11:47PM #483 | |
|
Char, After reading the following I have the feeling that you are misinformed about what happened on the flotilla. You wrote: "Nobody speaks about lying. It is not a lie to say you are sorry for having harmed naïvely innocent others. Unless you actually aren't sorry, of course, but think that naiveté is punishable. Is that what you think?"
The State of Israel had the right under international law to impose the blockade of Gaza and it was the Turks who violated international law by trying to run the blockade, especially since Israel offered to allow the humanitarian goods on board to be sent to Gaza once those goods had been inspected; an offer the Turks and the organizations sponsoring the flotilla refused. Char, the IDF soldiers who boarded the ship were not dealing with a bunch of humanitarians passively resisting while singing "Give Peace a Chance". These were violent people who identified themselves as enemies, not only of the State of Israel, but of all Jews. As for your expectations of a change in Turkish policy as a consequence of an Israeli apology, I think that this shows a certain degree of naivety on your part as to how current Turkish politics works and the motivations which drive the current Turkish regime. Char, you don't have to answer this (and I apologize if this presses any of your buttons) but do you think that the holocaust could have been prevented had the Jews apologized to Hitler for stabbing Germany in the back during World War One? Isn't this basically what you are asking Israel to do now with Turkey? Habesor
Habesor
|
|
|
Quick Reply
|
|
| 12 months ago :: Jun 23, 2012 - 7:43AM #484 | |
|
Hello Habesor! The problem we face here is having two widely diverging reports from two obviously biased sources. The Palmer report distills Israeli & Tuirkish reports, they didn't investigate anything on their own. People on board apparently were shot from behind, one in execution style in the back of the head, in a raid that violated the IDF's own command rules and used widely disproportionate violence NOT ONLY on the Mavi Marmara, but also on other boats (albeit non-lethal, at least, over there).
|
|
|
Quick Reply
|
|
| 12 months ago :: Jun 23, 2012 - 12:15PM #485 | |
>>>>>>> Yeah. These "Unarmed terrorists" had lot of cement, flour, cooking oil etc and they wanted to scare the crap out of Israel with their bare hands!! darn, these people are something else. Heading towrds Israel without locking their hands and feet to ensure "Security" of Israel? With this new technology cooking oil and two hards were enough to "staging an attack on Israel." [ I just remember they were heading to Gaza--not Israel, but this sounds better!]. We do live in strange time...... |
|
|
Quick Reply
|
|
| 12 months ago :: Jun 23, 2012 - 9:39PM #486 | |
|
Chari Read the old issues of Der Sturmer. It will help you understand that it was the Jews who were accused of stabbing Germany in the back (of course the argument was that the unions and business were both controlled by Jews, that the Jews were both the communist threat and the capitalists - some things never change) I think you are not giving the Israelis enough credit for their political sophistication. They are well aware of a no win situation when they see one, they also are well aware when someone is trying to play them for fools, which Turkey is doing. |
|
|
Quick Reply
|
|
| 12 months ago :: Jun 24, 2012 - 8:28AM #487 | |
|
Quote: ' Until today, the IDF won't release the confiscated media documenting the assault, nor its own full footage of what happened. Why do you think is that the case?' Yes I'd also like to know the answer to this. Some Australian reporters' personal items were taken. |
|
|
Quick Reply
|
|
| 12 months ago :: Jun 24, 2012 - 9:46AM #488 | |
|
Char, you wrote: "The problem we face here is having two widely diverging reports from two obviously biased sources." Actually we have more than two widely divergent reports. On the Israeli side we have more or less one report and on the Turkish side we have reports from the IHH, the Turkish government and the Free Gaza Movement which diverge from each other in significant ways. We also have an in-depth report from the BBC (and an in depth report on the report) "The Palmer report distills Israeli & Turkish reports, they didn't investigate anything on their own. People on board apparently were shot from behind, one in execution style in the back of the head, in a raid that violated the IDF's own command rules and used widely disproportionate violence NOT ONLY on the Mavi Marmara, but also on other boats (albeit non-lethal, at least, over there)." Since the amount and nature of the force used by the IDF on the other boats was directly related to the amount of force used against the IDF on those boats (ranging from zero to life threatening actions) I find it difficult to understand what you mean by disproportionate force. As for the Palmer report, neither side disputes the facts stated in the report but Turkey disputes the report's findings that the Israeli blockade was legal according to international law. Char, I asked:
To which you answered: "I do not see even a wildly imaginative connection here - and I think you underestimate the level of democracy and individual political maturity in Turkey." I cannot testify to the political maturity of individual Turkish citizens but the Turkish government, since the ascendancy of an Islamist party to power, has increasingly appealed to latent prejudices in Turkish society to stay in power. The distancing of Turkey from Israel is part of this and began long before the boarding of the Mavi Marmara. As for the connection with a Jewish apology for stabbing Germany in the back, it would be apologizing for a lie told by the Nazi's to keep and maintain power through appeals to latent prejudices in German society. Neither an apology to Hitler nor an apology to Turkey works in these sorts of situations. It is a bit like Martin Luther King apologizing to southern racists for advocating the rape of white women by black men. Neither King nor the civil rights movement ever advocated such a thing but that was what was believed by Southern White racists. An apology by King would not have helped here either. Habesor
Habesor
|
|
|
Quick Reply
|
|
| 12 months ago :: Jun 25, 2012 - 4:12AM #489 | |
You're, quite by exception, getting tasteless in your comparison here. I wonder why? Do you somehow think Israel was attacked by this "flotilla"?
tl;dr
|
|
|
Quick Reply
|
|
| 12 months ago :: Jun 25, 2012 - 4:53AM #490 | |
|
Char, you asked: "How many Nazis have Jews killed then, that an apology would be analogous?" If I am not mistaken, one. That was the event which brought on Kristallnacht, though the Nazis had planned it long before the killing of the German diplomat. The Nazis also demanded that the Jews apologize and pay damages for the breakage of Kristallnact, which the Jews did, but that didn't win over the Nazis to the tolleration of Jews either.
"You're, quite by exception, getting tasteless in your comparison here. I wonder why?" Usually the demand for an apology for an act that was never committed involves a fairly tasteless set of circumstances. I apologized before presenting the first example and I will now apologize for the my second example. I feel free to apologize because I did bring these examples here and I know that their recitation can be disturbing. But the examples are real events and I did challenge you to show some example where an apology reversed a policy of a state motivated by something other than the act being apologized for. So far you have provided no example tasteless or tasteful. Do you somehow think Israel was attacked by this "flotilla"? According to international law, Israel was most definitely attacked by the flotilla and that is why the Palmer report insisted that Turkey should have done more to prevent the convoy from sailing. This is also why Greece was well within its rights to prevent ships sailing from its territorial waters with the announced intention of breaking the Israeli blockade. Char, this should be obvious to you unless you are one of those people who believe that international law is relevant only when it works against the interests or actions of the State of Israel. Habesor
Habesor
|
|
|
Quick Reply
|
|