| 3 years ago :: Oct 10, 2010 - 2:40AM #281 | |
|
As a person who claims that he knows the basic aims of Zionism after reading one misquote from Ben Gurion and another statement allegedly made by Ben Gurion to a political opponent (and only recorded by that opponent many years after it was supposedly made) I am surprised that you find it so difficult to believe that the Arabs (never mind the Persians) have intentions to kill Jews and you so readily chalk up the whole issue of Arab genocidal intent to Jewish paranoia. Here are a few public quotes by Arab leaders before and at the time of Israel's independence. I'm sure that you will explain them away but before you do, could you tell us what your common sense interprets their meanings to be: You know better than that. This was no accidental statement. The whole history of Zionism is loaded with this kind of statements.
The invasion [of the about to be declared State of Israel] was hardly surprising. Mufti e -Husseini, one of the worst Nazi collaborators, called for Jihad against Jews in a 1943 b roadcast from Radio Berlin during the height of the Holocaust:
Prior to the 1948 war against Israel, the Iraqi Prime Minister said all the Arabs would need would be "a few brooms" to drive the Jews into the sea. All they were waiting for was the British and said, "once we get the green light from the British we can easily throw out the Jews." [Quote from Sir Geoffrey Furlonge, "Palestine Is My Country: The Story of Musa Alami (Praeger Press, 1969)]
On the day that Israel declared its independence, Azzam Pasha, Secretary General of the Arab League, at Cairo press conference, (reported in the New York Times, May 16, 1948) declared "jihad", a holy war. He said that the Arab states rejected partition and intended to set up a "United State of Palestine." He then stated:
ArielG, that is just for starters. If you want, I can fill up this whole thread with quoitations of Arab political, religious and cultural leaders, all advocating genocide against the Jewish population of the State of Israel, and in some cases Jews in general.
Habesor Obviously the conflict has a long history, but the modern aspects of it are reactions to the Zionists establishment of an exclusive Jewish state. Of course they want to get rid of them. They didn't go to Europe and the US looking for trouble. Troubles were brought to them by the Zionists intent on building their utopia on the back of the residents of the region. |
|
|
Quick Reply
|
|
| 3 years ago :: Oct 10, 2010 - 2:42AM #282 | |
|
MM, in skimming your posts it seems to me that you have several misunderstandings about what Judaism teaches and what Jews believe. It *also* seems to me that you have a basic across-the-board-dislike/distrust of ANY religion's adherents - which of course is your right. But I think it may be worth your while to consider whether that may color your view of any given religion. As I've pointed out to people before, the'chosen' thing doesn't mean what 'outsiders' allege - it never has. It refers to our being chosen for the Covenant we cling to. In the Torah, it is recognized that other peoples have other Covenants with YHVH. AND it is also recognized that He loves and cares about *every* tribe of Man, polytheist pagans included. Nobody is teaching Jewish children that they are 'better' than anyone else. Is vanilla inherently 'better' than chocolate or strawberry? Or might different peopel have different favorite flavors? Nobody is teaching Jewish children that Judaism is 'true' and everyone else's faiths are 'false': we are teaching them that Judaism is OUR faith and the right one FOR US. (In case you wondered, so ar as we ever mention a 'heaven', it's open to anyone as it doesn't depend on doctrinal beliefs) The other MAJOR misunderstanding I see in your posts, MM, is an idea that 'orthodox' Jews take the Torah as literally true in the same way that 'conservative' or 'fundamentalist' Christians do. And that is absolutely NOT!!! the case. IT'S JUST NOT. Nor was it the case in ancient days. Simply reading the words about 'Jews using their religion to give an excuse for oppressing another group' makes me physically nauseous, it's such anathema to everything I've learned in my faith for over 50 years! And I have to wonder what the dickens you are looking at that you are thinking such things......because at no time have I heard any rabbi or teacher express an idea that we are 'better' in the ways your words suggest, nor have I read such things....... Now I understand that this post MIGHT be considered 'off-topic' - but where people have stated my religion teaches what I know I have never been taught, I think if those words are allowed, my answer to them should also be. While I concede it's possible there may be some loony fringe sect in Judaism which distorts our Teachings to claim we are 'superior' to another people, that won't make it 'mainstream' or 'acceptable'. And it certainly won't be in accord with the rest of the Teachings. |
|
|
Quick Reply
|
|
| 3 years ago :: Oct 10, 2010 - 2:52AM #283 | |
|
Arielg, that is your opinion. Certainly it's the opinion of someone who chose to claim they had no idea 'jewwatch' was anti-semitic. Someone who claims the Jews have 'excessive influence'....who insists 'Zionism is evil'. I submit that since you 'didn't know' that - you aren't competent to make any judgements about whether something is 'antisemitic' or not. Which means it's idiotic to heed your comments about 'Zionist paranoia' or anything else on the entire topic. Anyone who has tried to claim the filth and lies on 'jewwatch' had any veracity or reliability has demonstrated themselves to be so far entrenched in anti-semitic bigoted fantasy that I for one see no point in including them in any such discussion.
|
|
|
Quick Reply
|
|
| 3 years ago :: Oct 11, 2010 - 8:11AM #284 | |
My answers to your constant accusations are deleted, based on who knows what, so I don't have anything to say to you. |
|
|
Quick Reply
|
|
| 3 years ago :: Oct 11, 2010 - 11:48AM #285 | |
|
Ariel There are rules concerning what you can and cannot say here on Beliefnet. They are posted somewhere here, I think at the beginning of each forum's site. When one makes a mistake and writes something which violates the rules, it generally gets removed and the poster receives a message from B'net explaining that it was removed and why. Check your inbox. |
|
|
Quick Reply
|
|
| 3 years ago :: Oct 11, 2010 - 1:07PM #286 | |
|
"Obviously the conflict has a long history, but the modern aspects of it are reactions to the Zionists establishment of an exclusive Jewish state. Of course they want to get rid of them. They didn't go to Europe and the US looking for trouble. Troubles were brought to them by the Zionists intent on building their utopia on the back of the residents of the region." The Zionists, contrary to the 'information' found at 'jewwatch' AND OTHER HATE SPEECH SITES, had no intent to dominate, oppress or harm anyone. There is NOTHING in either Jewish or Zionist philosophy which would support such actions. And there had been a Jewish AND 'Zionist' presence in the region for decades before the partition. As to 'on the backs of the residents of the region' - Just under ONE MILLION of said residents were forced penniless off their lands and from their homes in'47-'49. Any 'discussion' of the human misery associated with that time which does NOT include a discussion of those refugees is incomplete and biased. Those 950,000 homeless people were MADE homeless *simply because they were Jews in Arab lands* It's NOT the Jews - with 20% minorities having full legal rights - who are 'exclusivist': the actual history shows it's historically been Arabs who desire an 'exclusive' state. Nearly ALL 100,000 of Iran's Jews have fled that nation since it became 'an Islamic Republic' - and started executing Jews on trumped-up charges before confiscating their estates. |
|
|
Quick Reply
|
|
| 3 years ago :: Oct 11, 2010 - 1:14PM #287 | |
|
"You know better than that. This was no accidental statement. The whole history of Zionism is loaded with this kind of statements." Only the 'history' presented by a site titled 'jewwatch' or its assorted clones. Decent people know better than to trust anything coming off of a site like that....of course it is different fofr anti-semites. They just gobble that filth right up. |
|
|
Quick Reply
|
|