| 4 years ago :: Jan 15, 2009 - 1:49AM #41 | |
|
|
|
Quick Reply
|
|
| 4 years ago :: Jan 15, 2009 - 9:16AM #42 | |
|
[QUOTE=amcolph;1019024]the Christian founding fathers belonged, for the most part, to denominations which would make them, by your own definition, "fake" Christians.
Of the 55 delegates to the Constitutional Convention, there were 28 Episcopalians 8 Presbyterians 7 Congregationalists 2 Lutherans 2 Dutch Reformed 2 Methodists 2 Roman Catholics 3 Deists 1 Unknown. Of those, only the Presbyterians and the Dutch Reformed can be, by any stretch of the imagination, termed "Bible-believing true Christians," and that is giving you the benefit of the doubt, as "Bible-believing" Christianity (ie, Fundamentalism) had not yet been invented. All that fanciful blather about how pious they were doesn't come into it. The fact of the matter is that by virtue of their theology at least 80% of the founding fathers were not "Bible-believing true Christians" as you, yourself, have defined the term.[/QUOTE] All except the bottom four are Christian denominations. |
|
|
Quick Reply
|
|
| 4 years ago :: Jan 15, 2009 - 10:13AM #43 | |
|
[QUOTE=DrWhite;1020332]All except the bottom four are Christian denominations.[/QUOTE]
No doubt, but according to our correspondent Friend! not all of these denominations are "Bible-believing true Christian", denominations but instead are "fake Christians," as he calls them. His reasoning, as far as I understand it is as follows: 1. The Founding Fathers were Christians 2. Therefore, the nation they founded is a Christian nation. 3. Consequently, Christianity is in a priviledged position of some kind yet to be characterized. However, he makes it clear that the position of priviledge belongs only to what he calls "Bible-believing true Christians." If so, how can it depend on the "fake" faith of men who were not, for the most part, Bible-believing true Christians? In other words, his case for a Christian nation depends on regarding the Founding Fathers as Christians, but most of them belonged to churches which he regards as apostate. I think he should be consistent. He should either abandon his claim that the Founders were Christians, or acknowledge the authenticity of the churches they belonged to.
This post contains no advertisements or solicitations.
|
|
|
Quick Reply
|
|
| 4 years ago :: Jan 15, 2009 - 10:35AM #44 | |
|
Of course, he has since advanced the claim that the Founders were privately "Bible-believing true Christians" in spite of the unacceptable apostate theology of the churches they belonged to.
He has not yet provided any evidence for this claim.
This post contains no advertisements or solicitations.
|
|
|
Quick Reply
|
|
| 4 years ago :: Jan 15, 2009 - 1:11PM #45 | |
"When it shall be said in any country in the world, my poor are happy; neither ignorance nor distress is to be found among them; my jails are empty of prisoners, my streets of beggars; the aged are not in want, the taxes are not oppressive; the rational world is my friend, because I am a friend of its happiness: When these things can be said, then may the country boast its constitution and its government." -- Thomas Paine: The Rights Of Man (1791)
|
|
|
Quick Reply
|
|
| 4 years ago :: Jan 15, 2009 - 1:16PM #46 | |
|
[QUOTE=TPaine;1020833]Is this list based on which church they officially belonged to, or their actual beliefs? Many of our founders had roots in various denominations, but were in fact Unitarians.[/QUOTE]
The churches they 'officially' belonged to, of course. Indeed, I tend to side with your opinion rather than Friend!'s unsupported assertion that they were closet Fundamentalists.
This post contains no advertisements or solicitations.
|
|
|
Quick Reply
|
|
| 4 years ago :: Jan 15, 2009 - 1:18PM #47 | |
"When it shall be said in any country in the world, my poor are happy; neither ignorance nor distress is to be found among them; my jails are empty of prisoners, my streets of beggars; the aged are not in want, the taxes are not oppressive; the rational world is my friend, because I am a friend of its happiness: When these things can be said, then may the country boast its constitution and its government." -- Thomas Paine: The Rights Of Man (1791)
|
|
|
Quick Reply
|
|
| 4 years ago :: Jan 15, 2009 - 1:21PM #48 | |
|
[QUOTE=Friend!;1020805]The historic Christians churches were true the faith back then. Only about 80 years later or so did they start the slide into secularism and inclusivism. The founders were mostly born again, Bible-beleiving Christians who enjoyed and reveled in their love relationship with God through His Son, Jesus Christ.[/QUOTE]
Fatuous, self-serving revisionism. For shame, Friend!. Nothing but humbug! Let us see your evidence that the Founders were closet Fundamentalist Protestants!
This post contains no advertisements or solicitations.
|
|
|
Quick Reply
|
|
| 4 years ago :: Jan 15, 2009 - 3:27PM #49 | |
|
[QUOTE=DrWhite;1020332][QUOTE=amcolph]
the Christian founding fathers belonged, for the most part, to denominations which would make them, by your own definition, "fake" Christians. Of the 55 delegates to the Constitutional Convention, there were 28 Episcopalians 8 Presbyterians 7 Congregationalists 2 Lutherans 2 Dutch Reformed 2 Methodists 2 Roman Catholics 3 Deists 1 Unknown. [/QUOTE] All except the bottom four are Christian denominations.[/QUOTE] Excuse me, are you trying to say that the bottom four individuals are not Christians, or are you saying that the bottom four religious identities listed are not? Just want to make sure we're crystal clear, here.
Shared pain is lessened, shared joy increased. Thus do we refute entropy. - Mike Callahan, Callahan's Crosstime Saloon
|
|
|
Quick Reply
|
|
| 4 years ago :: Jan 16, 2009 - 7:56AM #50 | |
|
Deists are not "Christians" as they do not, generally, believe in the supernatural elements of the Christian faith. Simply put, they don't believe in miracles. Thomas Jefferson wrote his own version of the King James that left out all the miracles of Christ. So, technically, deists are not Christians.
|
|
|
Quick Reply
|
|