| 5 years ago :: Aug 25, 2008 - 11:36AM #161 | |
|
I, too, was unable to access the threads on this site all day Sunday. I could not get past the discussion board index.
Jim |
|
|
Quick Reply
|
|
| 5 years ago :: Aug 25, 2008 - 12:30PM #162 | |
|
[QUOTE=CharikIeia;713204]
Which does not change the fact that the CIS peacekeeping mission, staffed by Russia, was implemented when Georgia still was member of this organisation -- so, while troops must leave Poti and the Georgian mainland, and quickly so, there is no doubt about the legitimacy of these troops in Abchasia and South Ossetia. Just to reiterate a fact that Saakashvili-fans love to forget: this war was started by an attack of the Georgian army on Tskhinvali. Everything ensuing must be viewed against this background. The unilateral blaming of Russia is not worthy of much attention, as it reveals a partisan viewpoint, not one of genuine interest in the situation. [/QUOTE] Legitimacy of conditional alliance of troops is another issue.... The Georgian army starting a 'war' or legimately reclaiming the sovereign territory w/out Russia's influence? Russia is involved...and any covert operations will be known.... MSNBC: August 25, 2008 http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/26385413/ "In the days before the war began, Ossetians seemed aware that something was about to happen. On Aug. 5 and 6, Ossetian officials sent 36 buses to take women and children to Russia." "The worst violence was committed by the "irregulars" -- South Ossetian militiamen and others who joined the Russians as they came in. " |
|
|
Quick Reply
|
|
| 5 years ago :: Aug 25, 2008 - 5:33PM #163 | |
|
No government can "legitimately" make war on its own population, be it in Chechnya under Putin, South Ossetia under Saakashvili, or Iraq's Kurdish provinces sunder Saddam.
Concerning "who commited the worst violence", as I said, this is not a pissing contest. Reports from Tskhinvali differ from the reports you quote. Yet you solely quote support for the Georgian stance. Why? Do you want to re-start the Cold War, and sacrifice objectivity for partisanship?
tl;dr
|
|
|
Quick Reply
|
|
| 5 years ago :: Aug 25, 2008 - 6:00PM #164 | |
|
Working myself backwards...
[QUOTE=L.Ann;708972]It appears that the EU cannot dismiss the conflict of Russia's intrusive entry into Georgia.
|
|
|
Quick Reply
|
|
| 5 years ago :: Aug 25, 2008 - 7:25PM #165 | |
|
More responses to older posts..
[QUOTE=Jstanl;709743]I confess to being a little irritated in making my response. There is a distinct underlying message here of Russia gets what Russia wants and the USA is expected to get in line.
|
|
|
Quick Reply
|
|
| 5 years ago :: Aug 26, 2008 - 9:54AM #166 | |
|
[QUOTE=CharikIeia;714313]No government can "legitimately" make war on its own population, be it in Chechnya under Putin, South Ossetia under Saakashvili, or Iraq's Kurdish provinces sunder Saddam.[/QUOTE]
Historians universally label the US civil war a "War". It is usually called the American Civil War or the War Between the States. That war killed more Americans (citizens of the USA) than any other we have ever been engaged in, before or since. British historians refer to the civil conflicts that ultimately led to the removal of Richard III and the placement of Henry Tudor (Henry VII) on the throne of England as the Wars of the Roses. We are bogging down in semantics here. "A rose by any other name is still a rose." (Shakespeare) Jim |
|
|
Quick Reply
|
|
| 5 years ago :: Aug 26, 2008 - 10:45AM #167 | |
|
[QUOTE=L.Ann;694841]
Chark: i have no issue with citizenship, nor passports......However, it appears that the "Russian government believes they have the obligated responsibility to defend all of their citizens no matter where they may be in the world." Thus, don't you find the free hand out of massive citizenship was a strategic move from the beginning to overthrow the government and an excuse for invasion of territoral rights in a sovereign country? I think it is quite obvious to most analysts without vowed political alignments.... [/QUOTE] I do hope that Jim will return to the debate, he writes so brilliantly and is poised with intellectual, philosophical and scientific ability and consideration.....:) "A fight for the oil pipelines is one answer-By absorbing Abkhazia and South Ossetia, Russia puts even more pressure on Georgia's BTC pipeline, one of the few that transits oil through the Caucasus that is not under Russian control." "These three former Soviet republics all have pro-Western and anti-Russian leaders. All three countries signed a preliminary deal last year to extend a Ukrainian pipeline to move Caspian oil from the Black Sea to the Baltic Sea, and then on to the West - again, outside Russian control." "Democracy’s basic ingredients, the freedom to assemble, to speak, to choose - these are like kryptonite in the hands of the Kremlin’s authoritarian mega-capitalists." http://worldblog.msnbc.msn.com/archive/ … 92535.aspx |
|
|
Quick Reply
|
|
| 5 years ago :: Aug 26, 2008 - 11:05AM #168 | |
|
[QUOTE]So the invasion by US troops were not an offese against the sovereign status of Iraq, or Afghanistan?[/QUOTE]
Iraq, Afghanistan and Georgia all have different facts. The first two, in different ways, were actually attacking other soveriegn nations outside their own borders. Georgia was not doing this yet Russia crossed Georgia's international border using military troops and equipment that had been staging on the other side of the border for two years. The politics of any of these situations is a matter of political opinion but the reality in each case is defined by the reason for crossing an international boundary. If we tolerate the ignoring of internationally accepted borders, then we are opening the door to international anarchy. The acceptance of moving borders, especially unilaterally and based on legendary ideas of ancient borders, will negate the legitimacy of every modern border. Moving borders based on common ethinic backgrounds will simply lead to an endless procession of border wars. In history, these wars have proven to be some of the bloodiest and most vicious, invariably resulting in 'ethnic cleansing' and even genocide. Jim |
|
|
Quick Reply
|
|
| 5 years ago :: Aug 26, 2008 - 11:20AM #169 | |
|
L.Ann;
Thanks for your support but I'm really not that smart or knowledgeable. I am just old and have been observing these issues for a long time, probably before you or Char were born. ;) One thing about being my age (72) is that one eventually quits thinking in terms of what is possible in one's own lifetime. That does tend to lead to a more philosophical perspective. :) Jim |
|
|
Quick Reply
|
|
| 5 years ago :: Aug 26, 2008 - 11:31AM #170 | |
|
OH, he's back...must have been posting at similar time frame....
|
|
|
Quick Reply
|
|