Post Reply
Page 14 of 14  •  Prev 1 ... 9 10 11 12 13 14
Switch to Forum Live View Intolerance of atheists
4 years ago  ::  Mar 03, 2009 - 10:02AM #131
gorm-sionnach
Posts: 1,662

I think beyond just the monolithic establishments, like the Vatican, that the reason many people are vocally intolerant of atheists is because they believe that the Atheists want to or are trying to stop those people from having a religion, or faith at all. That is why it is ''okay'' to be a jerk towards atheists, because they are "inherently jerks themselves". It is like many things a wash and so broad a stereotype that it becomes easy to refute. From my experience Atheists have no beef with anyone who is not trying to push their own religion on others. This is why you'll see a lot more Atheist-Christian flack, as opposed to Atheist-Pagan flack. Aside from the sheer numbers, there are so many Christian organizations and individuals who are wantonly pushing their beliefs onto everyone and this is where many people, not just Atheists, take issue.


You'll see a lot of conflagration between Atheists and other groups that certain sects of conservative Religion dislike, presently though Atheists are up at the top of the list, because they are perceived as the biggest "Threat" by these same organizations and groups. One need not look very hard to find this type of rhetoric.

Truth in our hearts, Strength in our arms, Fulfillment in our tongues.
Quick Reply
Cancel
4 years ago  ::  Mar 03, 2009 - 3:36PM #132
mountain_man
Posts: 34,150

Mar 3, 2009 -- 8:09AM, Maya3 wrote:


I think that Atheism is a  very valid and very plausible philosophy. Really.



I know it sounds like I'm being a jerk, but I've been an Atheist for 55 years now and I've never heard of any philosophy behind Atheism. "Atheism" is basically a catchall term so that people can conveniently put all Atheists in one word. As you can see; it's doesn't work very well since there is no "ism" to follow.


I just used the spell checker that comes with the new forum. Just click on the "ABC" above and it underlines all the misspelled words with little red dots. Then right click on that word and it gives you suggested spellings.


...I think that a lot of people are threatened by atheism because there is a lot of power in religious groups. Imagine what would happen to the Vatican and other religious groups of authority if people didn't believe anymore?



Those that have the need to control wouldn't be able to control anymore and those that have a need to be controlled wouldn't feel secure anymore.

Dave - Just a Man in the Mountains.

I am a Humanist. I believe in a rational philosophy of life, informed by science, inspired by art, and motivated by a desire to do good for its own sake and not by an expectation of a reward or fear of punishment in an afterlife.
Quick Reply
Cancel
4 years ago  ::  Mar 03, 2009 - 8:12PM #133
Maya3
Posts: 928

mountainman:



I know it sounds like I'm being a jerk, but I've been an Atheist for 55 years now and I've never heard of any philosophy behind Atheism. "Atheism" is basically a catchall term so that people can conveniently put all Atheists in one word. As you can see; it's doesn't work very well since there is no "ism" to follow.



 


Sorry.


All I was trying to say is that it might be true that there is no God or no afterlife.


Maya

Quick Reply
Cancel
4 years ago  ::  Mar 03, 2009 - 10:56PM #134
mountain_man
Posts: 34,150

Mar 3, 2009 -- 8:12PM, Maya3 wrote:


Sorry.


All I was trying to say is that it might be true that there is no God or no afterlife.


Maya




No need to be sorry. I knew you didn't mean anything derogatory. I just wanted to make the point there is no "ism" in Atheism. Not you, but others make up these elaborage beliefs and assign them to Atheists and call that Atheism. It's their way of turning Atheism into something that needs to be attacked.

Dave - Just a Man in the Mountains.

I am a Humanist. I believe in a rational philosophy of life, informed by science, inspired by art, and motivated by a desire to do good for its own sake and not by an expectation of a reward or fear of punishment in an afterlife.
Quick Reply
Cancel
4 years ago  ::  Mar 04, 2009 - 7:23AM #135
Maya3
Posts: 928
[/quote]


 


Thanks,


I understand what you mean.


 


Maya

Quick Reply
Cancel
4 years ago  ::  Jun 14, 2009 - 7:55PM #136
Serenity1552
Posts: 321

Feb 22, 2008 -- 9:08AM, omprem wrote:

It is interesting that the topic 'Religious Tolerance' is actually home to a hotbed of atheists who exhibit absolutely no tolerance of anything that they do not understand or endorse. They use the phrase 'religious tolerance' to imply that they have tolerance when in fact they do not. They are rude, mean-spirited, fearful and more than a little desperate. Promoting untruth is a common political tactic: the more times an untruth is told the more likely some people are likely to start believing it.



 


Anyone who says, that they know for sure,  whether or not, there is a God, is religious.


Therefore Atheism is a religion.  They are often no more tolerant, then many religious fundamentalists.


Anyone who is wise, keeps an open mind, about things that cannot be proved

Quick Reply
Cancel
4 years ago  ::  Jun 14, 2009 - 9:28PM #137
gorm-sionnach
Posts: 1,662

Jun 14, 2009 -- 7:55PM, Serenity1552 wrote:


Feb 22, 2008 -- 9:08AM, omprem wrote:

It is interesting that the topic 'Religious Tolerance' is actually home to a hotbed of atheists who exhibit absolutely no tolerance of anything that they do not understand or endorse. They use the phrase 'religious tolerance' to imply that they have tolerance when in fact they do not. They are rude, mean-spirited, fearful and more than a little desperate. Promoting untruth is a common political tactic: the more times an untruth is told the more likely some people are likely to start believing it.



 


Anyone who says, that they know for sure,  whether or not, there is a God, is religious.


Therefore Atheism is a religion.  They are often no more tolerant, then many religious fundamentalists.


Anyone who is wise, keeps an open mind, about things that cannot be proved




 


No they are not. Absence of belief or a posistion on a theological concept (in this case in the negative) does not make one religious. Are you making the argument that non-belief in something makes one religious?


Atheism is not a religion, and no matter how many times people try to make it out to be so, does not change the fact it is not.

Truth in our hearts, Strength in our arms, Fulfillment in our tongues.
Quick Reply
Cancel
4 years ago  ::  Jul 10, 2009 - 3:47PM #138
Theist
Posts: 4

why are people intolerant..?


it means to Not tolerate somebody else point of view regardless of what they profess to believe; and believing they posses the position to change the content within.


I thought some of you really would have discovered that by now.


 


 


 


Steve The Gnosis Giant


Neither Steve Nor a Giant.


 


why beat the horse to death?


it is already dead.


 


 


 


 

Quick Reply
Cancel
Page 14 of 14  •  Prev 1 ... 9 10 11 12 13 14
 
    Viewing this thread :: 0 registered and 1 guest
    No registered users viewing
    Advertisement

    Beliefnet On Facebook