Jul 17, 2012 -- 8:04PM, iamachildofhis wrote:

Jul 17, 2012 -- 6:31PM, Sigmund wrote:

steven_guy: If Creationism is true, then why do we never find rabbits fossilised next to stegosauruses or modern crabs fossiled with trilobites or pteranodons fossiled next to pigeons?

iama: Creation is true.

We don't know that rabbit fossils are not found next to stegosauruses, because all fossils have not been excavated, yet.

It is, also, the practice of evolutionist-geologists that they don't publicize fossil findings which contradict their theory. (Are you ever going to retract and apologize for this lie? I mean, YOUR OWN LINKS show it to be a lie)

Other mammals have been found with dinosaur fossils, so that is equivalent to rabbits. I forgot to mention this one yesterday. This is simply not true.

Pollen Pardox

Sigmund: You boggle the mind sometimes. Did you even read the article you linked to? The authors are commenting on an article in the 1966 issue of NATURE MAGAZINE!

If scientists never publicize findings that contradict their theory, how was there an article in the world's most-cited, interdisciplinary scientific journal to be commented on? I mean Nature has only been published since 1869 so it might have easy for you to miss.

(Of course the article they are commenting on is 45+ years out of date but hey! What's nearly half a century of scientific investigation between friends, right iama?)

Please provide evidence of your claim that "... mammals have been found with dinosaur fossils"

iama: Following, firstly, is the article which I was searching for, yesterday.  The author states that the ToE is finished, because of what is, now,  known.

Living fossils: a powerful argument for creation

So he claims that he found mammals and dinosaurs together. Whoopee. He provides no evidence for his claims.

Just so you know, the typical timeline for the evolution of mammals (according to your demon theory of evolution) is:

• Synapsids: 315 ma
• Therapsids: 275 ma
• Cynodants: 250 ma
• Docodonts: 165 ma
• Eutheria: 160 ma
• Placental orders: 100 ma - 83 ma

Various mammailian features:

• Jaws and middle ear: 195 ma
• Lactation: 275 ma
• Hair/fur: 164 ma

Since the extinction of dinosaurs is accepted by mainstream science as ocurring 65 ma, perhaps you could explain why finding mammal and dinosaur fossils in the same layer is a problem?

Note that in the OP, steven_guy is asking for specific examples of the fossils of MODERN mammals being found with dinosaurs. That has not been found.

Nowhere in this link is it claimed that dinaosaurs and mammals were found together in the same layers. It is an article about the abundance of fossils found in the Gobi Desert. How do you think this article helps your claim?

Nowhere in this link is there a claim that dinosaur fossils and mammal fossils were found together.

It is however an excellent example of your lie about scientists never publishing results that go against the theory of evolution. Are you ever going to retract that statement?

Once again, nowhere in this link is there anything claiming that dinosaur and mammal fossils were found together. This one just shows that a fossilized hair was found in 100 ma amber. Since the development of hair/fur in mammals is estimated at 165 ma, why exactly is this a problem for the theory of evolution?

Jul 17, 2012 -- 10:10PM, iamachildofhis wrote:

Jul 17, 2012 -- 8:48PM, amcolph wrote:

iama:

The author states that the ToE is finished, because of what is, now,  known.

Blu: If he can actually show that, then why is he publishing in creo parish magazines and propaganda sites and not in reputable journals of science?

Could it be because he knows that what he writes is only true in his dreams?

I take it telling lies to creos is what he does for a living?

iama: Since no evolution-presuppositioned peer-reviewed-journal is EVER going to publish that which would expose evolution for just what it is, The Lie, he wrote and published a book and DVD of what his worldwide 100,000 mile research into Living Fossils, found.

amcolph: But you never have explained what the purpose of the lie is.  Why would hundreds of thousands of scientists and technicians go to all that trouble?

iama:  They hate our Creator-God, The Bible, and Genesis!  Their humanism / elevation of man vs their responsibility to our Holy, Righteous Creator-God, because we are lost sinners / Christ Jesus died to save us from our sin, guilt natures.  Athesitic-our-Creator-God-denying god-men / women.  Worshipers of themselves and their chosen gods.

Do you have any evidence of this completely anti-Christian slander? Any at all?

By the way, do you really think that there are THAT many atheists in academia to be able to support a conspiracy of millions?