| 13 months ago :: May 30, 2012 - 4:10PM #121 | |
|
midutch: Odd (not really) that you fail to note that the VAST majority of "anti-creationism" ... "guys" ... are THEISTS who are IN NO WAY interested in abandoning faith in whatever God they whorship. That is an excellent point. Conflating "belief in evolution" with "atheism" is a popular --- and very dishonest --- YEC technique; I find t's use of it a better fit for someone who just wants to take potshots at atheism than someone who claims to dislike the "rigidity" of both sides of the YEC debate. |
|
|
Quick Reply
|
|
| 13 months ago :: May 30, 2012 - 4:17PM #122 | |
|
The "debate" has been over for some time now. We're left with luddites screaming and waving their arms about, railing against evolution and rational people on the other side. |
|
|
Quick Reply
|
|
| 13 months ago :: May 30, 2012 - 4:29PM #123 | |
Hand on there a minute, Wohali - ----------------------------------------------- From Wikipedia: "The Luddites were a social movement of 19th-century English textile artisans who protested – often by destroying mechanized looms – against the changes produced by the Industrial Revolution, that replaced them with less-skilled, low-wage labour, and which they felt were leaving them without work and changing their way of life. Eric Hobsbawm called machine wrecking: "collective bargaining by riot". It had been used in Britain since the Restoration as, due to the scattering of manufactories throughout different regions, large-scale strikes were impractical.[1] The movement was named after Ned Ludd, a youth who had allegedly smashed two stocking frames thirty years earlier, and whose name had become emblematic of machine destroyers.[2][3][4] " -------------------------------------------- So, the Luddites were swimming against the stream of technological change, and their choice of methodology was perhaps not optimal, but it doesn't look like they were totally irrational and divorced from reality. I think you may have insulted the Luddites by comparing them to modern YECists.
---------------------------------------------------------
What part of "Ph'nglui mglw'nafh Cthulhu R'lyeh wgah'nagl fhtagn" do you not understand? --------------------------------------------------------- Wind speeds of Mach 2 would messily disassemble most consumer electronics. --------------------------------------------------------- |
|
|
Quick Reply
|
|
| 13 months ago :: May 30, 2012 - 4:55PM #124 | |
|
DPM, I stand corrected! My apologies to any luddites that I may have offended. |
|
|
Quick Reply
|
|
| 13 months ago :: May 30, 2012 - 4:56PM #125 | |
|
Yes ... You EXACTLY make my Point ... "We REACH ... !!!" -- that "Hippie" Guy, to "Spock," in that "Star Trek" Episode To fully embrace The Discoveries of The Natural Sciences is in NO Respect anything at all AGAINST Religious Faith ... We AGREE ...
|
|
|
Quick Reply
|
|
| 13 months ago :: May 30, 2012 - 7:17PM #126 | |
"creationism" ... 2000+ years worth of ABYSMAL FAILURE ... and proud of it.
|
|
|
Quick Reply
|
|
| 13 months ago :: May 30, 2012 - 7:43PM #127 | |
|
***Please specify a Post in which I "rant" re: "Atheists" ... ??? Obviously, I DISAGREE with The Atheists re: The "God" Question, but I certainly don't "rant" about "Atheists" ...
|
|
|
Quick Reply
|
|
| 13 months ago :: May 30, 2012 - 7:53PM #128 | |
|
Until someone can create life, I don't see the debate ever ending. |
|
|
Quick Reply
|
|
| 13 months ago :: May 30, 2012 - 7:55PM #129 | |
|
|
|
Quick Reply
|
|
| 13 months ago :: May 30, 2012 - 8:13PM #130 | |
That won't do it. They'll just claim that creating life proves it was designed. Twits.
---------------------------------------------------------
What part of "Ph'nglui mglw'nafh Cthulhu R'lyeh wgah'nagl fhtagn" do you not understand? --------------------------------------------------------- Wind speeds of Mach 2 would messily disassemble most consumer electronics. --------------------------------------------------------- |
|
|
Quick Reply
|
|