Yet neither of these floods has produced any fossils, which we would expect if what Creationists say was true. We can only conclude that floods don't produce fossils, it is something else that causes fossilisation.
Yet neither of these floods has produced any fossils, which we would expect if what Creationists say was true. We can only conclude that floods don't produce fossils, it is something else that causes fossilisation.
When you've finished rolling on the floor, please be so kind as to bring us up to date with your Flood research.
Have you found that universal flood layer all over all continents dated to 2348 BCE yet?
Strawman argument Only the ignorant evos would expect that.
How about a genetic bottleneck in every species of land animal, each bottleneck dating to 2348 BCE?
Why would there be a bottleneck?
How about that 1.113 billion cubic miles of extra water over and above what's already on the earth?
I can look it up for you....but if you were to flatten out the earth surface...how high would the water be? Go ahead, google it. Post the answer.
Nothing? Not even one of them?
Gee, that means there was no Genesis flood! And didn't you tell us that if there's no Genesis flood, bang goes your salvation, right out the window? Yes, you did.
Can't have that. Better look even harder, ol' buddy.
When you've finished rolling on the floor, please be so kind as to bring us up to date with your Flood research.
Have you found that universal flood layer all over all continents dated to 2348 BCE yet?
Strawman argument Only the ignorant evos would expect that.
Silly answer. YOUR side of the SCIENCE vs bronze age FAIRY TALES "debate" is the one that says that this "flood" supposedly occurred around that time. YOUR side of the SCIENCE vs bronze age FAIRY TALES "debate" is also the one that has been an ABYMAL FAILURE at producing any research or empirical evidence that demonstrates that this "flood" ever happened.
As for which side is ignorant ... pretty much everyone in the world knows which side that would be.
How about a genetic bottleneck in every species of land animal, each bottleneck dating to 2348 BCE?
Why would there be a bottleneck?
Because that is what happens when animal populatins become extremely small (to the point where they are in danger of remaining genetically viable). Unfortunately for you, YOUR side of the SCIENCE vs bronze age FAIRY TALES "debate" has NEVER, ever, demonstrated that ALL land organism populatons were reduced to either two or seven or eight individuals a few thousand years ago (or that it does, or even understands, science).
How about that 1.113 billion cubic miles of extra water over and above what's already on the earth?
I can look it up for you....but if you were to flatten out the earth surface...how high would the water be? Go ahead, google it. Post the answer.
So, when are you "fundamentalist christian and muslim creationists" going to get around to demonstrationg that the Earth was ever flat as a billiard ball at some time in the past? Oh, wait. You guys don't do science, do you? All you do is make stuff up that is convincing to yourselves, so that you can maintain those bronze age fairy tale delusions, don't you?
Why is it so hard for you to admit that this is all that you "fundamentalist christian and muslim creationists" have ever had?
Nothing? Not even one of them?
Gee, that means there was no Genesis flood! And didn't you tell us that if there's no Genesis flood, bang goes your salvation, right out the window? Yes, you did.
Can't have that. Better look even harder, ol' buddy.
And do keep us posted.
"creationism" ... 2000+ years worth of ABYSMAL FAILURE ... and proud of it.
When you've finished rolling on the floor, please be so kind as to bring us up to date with your Flood research.
Have you found that universal flood layer all over all continents dated to 2348 BCE yet?
Strawman argument Only the ignorant evos would expect that.
How about a genetic bottleneck in every species of land animal, each bottleneck dating to 2348 BCE?
Why would there be a bottleneck?
How about that 1.113 billion cubic miles of extra water over and above what's already on the earth?
I can look it up for you....but if you were to flatten out the earth surface...how high would the water be? Go ahead, google it. Post the answer.
Nothing? Not even one of them?
Gee, that means there was no Genesis flood! And didn't you tell us that if there's no Genesis flood, bang goes your salvation, right out the window? Yes, you did.
Can't have that. Better look even harder, ol' buddy.
And do keep us posted.
Of course, when it comes to evidence 57 has no response. He demands evidence of others, then refuses to provide any himself. So now what? He'll cite references that don’t support his claims. He'll make stuff up and hope no one will notice.
But mostly, he'll try to deflect attention away from the undeniable fact that he has absolutely no evidence with insults and taunts, then a hissy fit. But still he has no evidence. Fortunately, everyone sees through all of this desperate posturing.
Perhaps the he should consider the irreparable harm that he's doing to his anti-intellectual goals by being such good example of dishonesty and deceit. Perhaps then he might stop wasting his time in such a vain pursuit. Perhaps not.
Perhaps the he should consider the irreparable harm that he's doing to his anti-intellectual goals by being such good example of dishonesty and deceit. Perhaps then he might stop wasting his time in such a vain pursuit. Perhaps not.
Well, I've been visiting this board for almost eight years. He's never indicated that he's ever thought about changing his ways and chances are that he's always been like that for as long as he's been a "fundamentalist christian creationist". I can't see him becoming any more honest at any time in the future.
"creationism" ... 2000+ years worth of ABYSMAL FAILURE ... and proud of it.
And yet each time evidence is presented for the abundence of transitional species examples in the fossil record, the creationists ask for more intermediaries......
if you were to flatten out the earth surface...how high would the water be?
1. Flatten the earth ? But the scriptures say that the ark came to rest on the MOUNTAINS of Ararat, not the PLAINS of Ararat. Which is it ?
2. Some YECs want to believe that plate tectonics in the past 4,500 years have thrust up mountains like portrayed in Fantasia, during the scene when dinosaurs are gong extinct. In a way, its not a bad portrayal of the orogeny that was occurring in the Rocky Mountain region 65 million years ago. Had this actually occured, dont you think that cultures all over the world would have written, artisitic, and traditional oral records of the devastation occurring around them ?
3. Mountains and the sediments shed off then would look much different had they been thrust up in the past 4,500 years.
if you were to flatten out the earth surface...how high would the water be?
1. Flatten the earth ? But the scriptures say that the ark came to rest on the MOUNTAINS of Ararat, not the PLAINS of Ararat. Which is it ?
I noticed you failed to google it also.
but anyway, recumbent folds in rock strata clearly indicate the strata was "soft" when folded. The folding occurred when the formations of mountains occurred....then again you already knew that.
2. Some YECs want to believe that plate tectonics in the past 4,500 years have thrust up mountains like portrayed in Fantasia, during the scene when dinosaurs are gong extinct. In a way, its not a bad portrayal of the orogeny that was occurring in the Rocky Mountain region 65 million years ago. Had this actually occured, dont you think that cultures all over the world would have written, artisitic, and traditional oral records of the devastation occurring around them ?
Do I need to present a list of cultures that have accounts of a great flood ? You should have thunk about that prior to posting the rhetoric you just posted.
Why is it that no creationist
3. Mountains and the sediments shed off then would look much different had they been thrust up in the past 4,500 years.
For My Mother: In Praise of a Life Lived
Chasing an Elusive God
Why Christianity Is Dying But Spirituality Is Thriving?
On the Frontlines An interview with Yael Eckstein, Senior Vice President of the ...
Ray Liotta, Seth Green Join an All-Star Cast in Indie Film ‘The Identical’ “We want to bring films with a redeeming value to the world. One of ...
A Life of Hope The fact that you’re standing here today with breath in your lungs ...
Habits for a Heart Healthy Lifestyle Heart disease is a top killer worldwide -- but our lifestyle choices ...
Emotional Equations Using brilliantly simple math that illuminates universal emotional ...
Are You a Compulsive or Binge Eater? Do you struggle with your weight? Find out more about compulsive and ...
Faith, Freedom and Rocker John Schlitt “We are making choices on greed and stupidity. The truth is that our ...
Robert Griffin III: Not the Average Rookie Washington Redskins quarterback Robert Griffin III continues to wow ...
Green Powders to Add to Your Diet Now Green powders are a great way to boost your health, keep your energy ...
Natural Deodorants That Actually Work What's that smell? Not us! We’ve been on a mission to find the best ...
Birth of a Habit How long does it take to form a new habit? How long should it take ...
Madly In Love With ME “I will never settle for less than my heart and soul desire.”
Is It Love If You're All Cranky When You Give It? Love is the answer to everything in life.
Living A Meaningful Life You are what you love and you love whatever you give your attention ...
"The Bible" a Labor of Love for Famed Producer, Wife The five-week, 10-hour TV special was nurtured by "Touched by an ...
Who Should Be Allowed to Pray for President Obama? It seems preposterous, but there’s a major debate over who is worthy ...
