Post Reply
Page 4 of 4  •  Prev 1 2 3 4
Switch to Forum Live View Mazon Creek fossil beds
1 year ago  ::  Apr 13, 2012 - 1:35PM #31
Sigmund
Sigmund
Posts: 1,194

Apr 13, 2012 -- 12:46PM, Ken wrote:


Apr 13, 2012 -- 12:37PM, Sigmund wrote:


Apr 13, 2012 -- 12:32AM, iamachildofhis wrote:

iama: What evidence persuades you that the world's vast sedimentary layers represent long-ages of time?  There is no evidence of life-form activity BETWEEN each of the layers, because they were all laid down by The Flood during the same year. 


So, what evidence is there that the sedimentary layers represent long-ages of time?




The bolded part of the above is a flat out fabrication on your part. You have been shown time and time again evidence for life form activity between layers:


Fossil Raindrops (yes I know not technically "life-form" activity)


www.nature.com/nature/journal/vaop/ncurr...


Fossilized Burrows


www.geo.ucalgary.ca/~macrae/t_origins/ca...


Trace Fossils


museum.gov.ns.ca/mnh/nature/tracefossils...



Surely all of those are on the layers, not between them. I don't understand what "between the layers" means.




Well, iama has never been known as one to correctly use scientific terminology, but I took it to mean, that there was no evidence of activity in one layer that was subsequently covered up by another, later layer of sediment. I can see how that could be interpretated as "between the layers."
Quick Reply
Cancel
1 year ago  ::  Apr 13, 2012 - 2:11PM #32
Midutch
Midutch
Posts: 2,300

Apr 13, 2012 -- 12:41AM, iamachildofhis wrote:


Apr 11, 2012 -- 6:28PM, wohali wrote:



wohali: Fascinating, our creationist friends have no explaination for epoch specific fossil beds other than "post flood".



iama:  wohali, I don't understand this statement.  What do you mean by "post flood"?


We're not the ones who came up with this ridiculous statement. That would be someone from your side of the "debate":


community.beliefnet.com/go/thread/view/3...

"creationism" ... 2000+ years worth of ABYSMAL FAILURE ... and proud of it.
Quick Reply
Cancel
1 year ago  ::  Apr 13, 2012 - 2:29PM #33
wohali
wohali
Posts: 10,068

Ken:


"Surely all of those are on the layers, not between them. I don't understand what "between the layers" means."


I bet she doesn't either..........
Quick Reply
Cancel
1 year ago  ::  Apr 19, 2012 - 8:02AM #34
EarthScientist
EarthScientist
Posts: 3,298

Apr 13, 2012 -- 12:46AM, iamachildofhis wrote:


Apr 13, 2012 -- 12:42AM, Ken wrote:



iama: What evidence persuades you that the world's vast sedimentary layers represent long-ages of time?  There is no evidence of life-form activity BETWEEN each of the layers, because they were all laid down by The Flood during the same year.


Ken: Do you have any idea of what a sedimentary layer is? Why would you speak of finding evidence of life between them? That doesn't make sense.



iama:  How do you understand these evolutionary-speculation "epochs," then?


Millions of years with no life-form activity evidences, having taken place BETWEEN THEM?


That doesn't make sense!


.





Of course it doesn't make sense, but then again, you're arguing against something which nobody has ever claimed rooted in your vast ignorance of geology.
Quick Reply
Cancel
1 year ago  ::  Apr 19, 2012 - 8:32AM #35
McAtheist
McAtheist
Posts: 6,287

I want to hear the YEC explanation for the data on Ken's list, Iam --- how do you explain things like raindrops and footprints that appear on top of "flood layers" that are sandwiched between other "flood layers?"  What evidence can you produce to support your "explanation?"


And do recall that your "model" calls for distinct strata to be laid down in 10 minutes or less.....


I'm thinking this is another suite of evidence that clearly demonstrates that YECism fails.
Quick Reply
Cancel
Page 4 of 4  •  Prev 1 2 3 4
Post Reply
 
    Viewing this thread :: 0 registered and 1 guest
    No registered users viewing
    Advertisement

    Beliefnet On Facebook