Apr 13, 2012 -- 3:23AM, Rgurley4 wrote:

I understand science and human knowledge very well.

Do you unbeleivers spiritually discern the miraculous words of the Bible?

First of all, your discernment changes according to the latest biblical fads. It wouldn't be in line with the discernment of those from the first century AD.

Second, unbelievers can certainly discern the words of the Bible. They are the same ideas that you'd find in all religious literature. There are patterns and ideas that repeat. A good study of theology will uncover them all. And even if it takes a strong mystical experience to understand them on a deeper level, unbelievers have those experiences, too. Their minds interpret them differently than yours would, but the experiences themselves are the same. Our brains are all wired alike.

Apr 13, 2012 -- 7:53AM, Rgurley4 wrote:

# 146
.....We (A-theists?} need a "scientific" definition (versus a "Biblical" definition)

...of "kind" / KINDS...

SEE:
7 days ago  ::  Apr 06, 2012 - 11:51AM  POST #77 

 BACK to BASICS ,,,please...by me

No one refuted it..I WIN!

What's to refute?

You were blithering along about some sort of interpertation of your cultic writings, which have been repeatedly demonstrated to be higly suspect when it comes to any sort of real world accuracy, failing most of the tests of veracity that have been applied.

The post is poorly organized, lacks coherence, and is rife with assumptions and unfounded claims. It's so much of a mess it would be hard to critique because just about anything that could be understood is clearly invalid.

If that makes you think you've won, your argument is in real trouble.

Rgurley:

"No one refuted it..I WIN!"

OK, now you are demonstrating a sense of humor.................