|
3 months ago ::
Feb 28, 2012 - 9:40AM
#63
|
|
|
dadmann Your posts show that you can shout but you can't listen. If you can't listen you can't persuade. So stand tall. You're a true Creationist.
|
|
|
|
3 months ago ::
Feb 27, 2012 - 11:59PM
#62
|
|
|
As far as Intelligent Design goes, so far it is not scientific at all: until the ID team comes up with a test that can separate rocks from rock tools, thereby demonstrating that they can differentiate between known undesigned/designed objects, then they don't have any way to tell if something is designed or not. If the extent of the ID "test" is to define anything alive as designed (which is the current state of irreducible complexity), then ID is nothing more than a form of weird mental masturbation --- at least the YECs are open about their religious agendas.
Moderated by
Jcarlinbn
on Feb 28, 2012 - 07:40PM
|
|
|
|
3 months ago ::
Feb 27, 2012 - 10:57PM
#61
|
|
|
I have YET to see them errect a single building in the name of their humanist mangod . . . LOL !!
Perhaps you haven't heard of the new gathering place for the devoted: www.theonion.com/articles/evolutionists-...
There are three sides to every story: your side, my side, and the truth.
|
|
|
|
3 months ago ::
Feb 27, 2012 - 10:57PM
#60
|
|
|
btw . . . these "churches and clergy" . . . our Bible calls the Harlot ( Rev 17 ) . . . the Harlot will run along side the Bride . . . the perverted will run along side the natural . . . the lie and error will run along side the truth . . . . it is what it is
Before you go to far in smearing the opposition, remember that most creationists are Dispensational Fundamentalists--not Christians.
This post contains no advertisements or solicitations.
|
|
|
|
3 months ago ::
Feb 27, 2012 - 10:54PM
#59
|
|
|
btw . . . these "churches and clergy" . . . our Bible calls the Harlot ( Rev 17 ) . . . the Harlot will run along side the Bride . . . the perverted will run along side the natural . . . the lie and error will run along side the truth . . . . it is what it is
The Harlot is the fundamentalist movement. Its aim is to destroy God and replace Him with an ideological idol. Too bad you've been ensnared. You speak like a true cultist.
There are three sides to every story: your side, my side, and the truth.
|
|
|
|
3 months ago ::
Feb 27, 2012 - 10:53PM
#58
|
|
|
"
PS: yall can drop the theology .. we're talking science here
If you want to talk science and not theology, then take that 'evolution is atheism' crap and stick it where the sun don't shine.
This post contains no advertisements or solicitations.
|
|
|
|
3 months ago ::
Feb 27, 2012 - 10:50PM
#57
|
|
|
Are they also silly enough to choose Santorum as their candidate?
Republicans are wary of Romney because he's not conservative enough and because he's shifty. They're wary of Gingrich because he's an angry psycho in the making. And Ron Paul is just way too far out there, and perhaps too old, too.
Santorum is still viable. He appeals to conservatives. Personally, I like some of his positions, but I don't think I'd vote for him.
Wow. Having heard what he's said in the two weeks since I wrote this, I think I disagree with everything he says.
There are three sides to every story: your side, my side, and the truth.
|
|
|
|
3 months ago ::
Feb 27, 2012 - 10:49PM
#56
|
|
|
They've never asked scientifically, can random mutation and natural selection generate the information content in living things."
They have indeed, and the answer is yes.
This post contains no advertisements or solicitations.
|
|
|
|
3 months ago ::
Feb 27, 2012 - 10:43PM
#55
|
|
|
"We know intuitively that Darwinism can accomplish some things, but not others. The question is what is that boundary? .. Does the information content in living things exceed that boundary? Darwinists have never faced those questions . . . They've never asked scientifically, can random mutation and natural selection generate the information content in living things."
Dr. Michael Egnor professor of neurosurgery and pediatrics at State University of New York, Stony Brook . . . .
Egnor is neither a biologist nor a scientist of any kind. His ignorance of evolutionary biology has often been remarked upon. His opinions are worthless.
|
|
|
|
3 months ago ::
Feb 27, 2012 - 10:42PM
#54
|
|
|
dadmann "To limit teaching to only one idea is a disservice to students because it is unnecessarily restrictive, dishonest, and intellectually myopic." But to confuse the theory of evolution with Creationism is a major category error. We study the former under science, the latter under Low Comedy. And I've already given you the tip that lists of purported Creationists won't change anything. You need to argue from knowledge and facts, not from stories.
|
|
|
