|
5 months ago ::
Jan 19, 2012 - 8:13AM
#41
|
|
|
Still waiting for responses from creationists.
|
|
|
|
5 months ago ::
Jan 14, 2012 - 10:02PM
#40
|
|
|
The lack of response leads me to believe that creationism has no explanation for the fossil record of human ancestors.
Creationism doesn't have any answers for the human fossil record! Not wanting truth to spoil a good story, they simply wish it would all go away.
|
|
|
|
5 months ago ::
Jan 11, 2012 - 4:52PM
#39
|
|
|
There was something like 206 different kinds of primates on the ark.
This is a VERY SPECIFIC claim. One would think that 57 has some research, empirical evidence or sound science to support this assertion.
Maybe he has Noah, Ham, Sham and Curly's boarding manifest that lists the "206 different kinds of primates" taken on board the ark. Or the fossil evidence of the "206 different kinds of primates" as they radiated out from the landing and departure point on Mt Ararat. Or the evidence that demonstrates the genetic bottleneck in the "206 different kinds of primates" some 4400 years ago.
Anyone holding their breathes for the presentation of this VERY SPECIFIC and amazing, ground-breaking research and empirical evidence?
The number 206 was determined from the current number of primate genus...which is the closest to "kinds". Keep in mind I'm not saying kinds = genus
And this answers ... what, exactly?
Who "determined" this? When was it "determined"? Where is the research, empirical evidence and sound science that supports this "determination"? Do you have Noah, Ham, Sham and Curly's boarding manifest that lists the "206 different kinds of primates" taken on board the ark, or the fossil evidence of the "206 different kinds of primates" as they radiated out from the landing and departure point on Mt Ararat, or the evidence that demonstrates the genetic bottleneck in the "206 different kinds of primates" some 4400 years ago? Or are you just pulling stuff out of ... thin air (not exactly what I wanted to say) as you go along?
"creationism" ... 2000+ years worth of ABYSMAL FAILURE ... and proud of it.
|
|
|
|
5 months ago ::
Jan 11, 2012 - 10:44AM
#38
|
|
|
The lack of response leads me to believe that creationism has no explanation for the fossil record of human ancestors.
|
|
|
|
5 months ago ::
Jan 11, 2012 - 3:43AM
#37
|
|
|
57 The number 206 was determined from the current number of primate genus...which is the closest to "kinds". Keep in mind I'm not saying kinds = genus How does a 'kind' differ from a genus?
|
|
|
|
5 months ago ::
Jan 10, 2012 - 6:51PM
#36
|
|
|
There was something like 206 different kinds of primates on the ark.
This is a VERY SPECIFIC claim. One would think that 57 has some research, empirical evidence or sound science to support this assertion.
Maybe he has Noah, Ham, Sham and Curly's boarding manifest that lists the "206 different kinds of primates" taken on board the ark. Or the fossil evidence of the "206 different kinds of primates" as they radiated out from the landing and departure point on Mt Ararat. Or the evidence that demonstrates the genetic bottleneck in the "206 different kinds of primates" some 4400 years ago.
Anyone holding their breathes for the presentation of this VERY SPECIFIC and amazing, ground-breaking research and empirical evidence?
The number 206 was determined from the current number of primate genus...which is the closest to "kinds". Keep in mind I'm not saying kinds = genus
It doesn't matter what you say, there is no evidence that the Great Flood ever happened and overwhelming evidence that life evolved on Earth.
|
|
|
|
5 months ago ::
Jan 10, 2012 - 6:50PM
#35
|
|
|
I've noticed 57, that you've failed to answer my questions. Perhaps you've forgotten? I'll repeat them here to save you the trouble of scrolling back through the thread: In regards to the literally thousands of fossilized remains: What exactly does creation say these are? Gods mistakes? Or aborted attempts? Where do they fit into the biblical story? Why did God create all these creatures at various places on the ape to human spectrum, and just let them die out? What was the purpose?
|
|
|
|
5 months ago ::
Jan 10, 2012 - 4:11PM
#34
|
|
|
There was something like 206 different kinds of primates on the ark.
This is a VERY SPECIFIC claim. One would think that 57 has some research, empirical evidence or sound science to support this assertion.
Maybe he has Noah, Ham, Sham and Curly's boarding manifest that lists the "206 different kinds of primates" taken on board the ark. Or the fossil evidence of the "206 different kinds of primates" as they radiated out from the landing and departure point on Mt Ararat. Or the evidence that demonstrates the genetic bottleneck in the "206 different kinds of primates" some 4400 years ago.
Anyone holding their breathes for the presentation of this VERY SPECIFIC and amazing, ground-breaking research and empirical evidence?
The number 206 was determined from the current number of primate genus...which is the closest to "kinds". Keep in mind I'm not saying kinds = genus
|
|
|
|
5 months ago ::
Jan 10, 2012 - 4:08PM
#33
|
|
|
The poster is asking about humanlike and apelike creatures that differ from today's apes and humans. You're saying there really were such things prior to the Flood?
There was something like 206 different kinds of primates on the ark.
I'm not really quite sure where the so-called problem lies.
The problem is with the humanlike creatures. Do you think there were such creatures at that time?
No.
|
|
|
|
5 months ago ::
Jan 09, 2012 - 6:38PM
#32
|
|
|
I'm not going to let this thread die. There are lots of threads about evolution on this board, but I haven't seen much about human ancestors, let's start with this one. :)
|
|
|
