|
4 months ago ::
Jan 24, 2012 - 2:00AM
#36
|
|
|
After viewing what Hovind owed in back taxes, I'd say creationists already have the funding, they just keep putting it in their own pocket instead of spending it on the necessary equipment to perform scientific experiments.
|
|
|
|
5 months ago ::
Dec 31, 2011 - 7:20PM
#35
|
|
|
What's an "evo"?
And whatever it is, its plural certainly isn't "evo's." Plurals are never formed with an apostrophe.
Ah, the disadvantages of Christian homeschooling! The blind leading the blind.
I am pretty sure homeschooling is illegal in Australia.
It should be illegal everywhere. Children must be taught by qualified professionals, not by their ignorant and half-crazed fundamentalist parents.
|
|
|
|
5 months ago ::
Dec 31, 2011 - 6:03PM
#34
|
|
|
What's an "evo"?
And whatever it is, its plural certainly isn't "evo's." Plurals are never formed with an apostrophe.
Ah, the disadvantages of Christian homeschooling! The blind leading the blind.
I am pretty sure homeschooling is illegal in Australia.
|
|
|
|
5 months ago ::
Dec 31, 2011 - 5:55PM
#33
|
|
|
What's an "evo"?
And whatever it is, its plural certainly isn't "evo's." Plurals are never formed with an apostrophe.
Ah, the disadvantages of Christian homeschooling! The blind leading the blind.
|
|
|
|
5 months ago ::
Dec 31, 2011 - 5:15PM
#32
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 months ago ::
Dec 31, 2011 - 4:55PM
#31
|
|
|
Perhaps I should present a list of begging evo's...short on funds. Do you think I couldn't if I looked?
Grantors only fund things that they feel have merit. So what does that say about all those rich evangelicals? Why aren't they putting their money into creationist "research"?
There are three sides to every story: your side, my side, and the truth.
|
|
|
|
5 months ago ::
Dec 31, 2011 - 4:50PM
#30
|
|
|
Perhaps I should present a list of begging evo's...short on funds. Do you think I couldn't if I looked?
LOL, there's no shortage of funding for real evolution research. That's your delusion.
Just compare the list of funded evolution science research projects and how many productive evolution science programs exist in our universities to what creationism and ID have garnered. Score: Creationism - zero. That's because creationists and ID do NO science research and thus have no reason to request any research funding. Reason, there is no science in creationism to research much less, fund. All you've got are entertainment sites with stories and nary a bit of empirical evidence. Give it up, bro.
|
|
|
|
5 months ago ::
Dec 31, 2011 - 4:48PM
#29
|
|
|
"If creationism were scientifically supportable, one would think there should be no shortage of funds for creationist-based programs of research
Perhaps I should present a list of begging evo's...short on funds. Do you think I couldn't if I looked?
it just shows you how baseless your pitiful argument really is.
You don't know what an argument is or how to stay on topic do you?
|
|
|
|
5 months ago ::
Dec 31, 2011 - 4:47PM
#28
|
|
|
Hmm 57's still in this thread running his foul mouth but failing to support anything he says. Perhaps he missed it the last two times. Too bad it's not analogous to the GC, if you say it is, then I'm sure you'll provide us with a wealth of fluvial geomorpholical data and measurements supporting your case.
|
|
|
|
5 months ago ::
Dec 31, 2011 - 4:44PM
#27
|
|
|
"If creationism were scientifically supportable, one would think there should be no shortage of funds for creationist-based programs of research
Perhaps I should present a list of begging evo's...short on funds. Do you think I couldn't if I looked? it just shows you how baseless your pitiful argument really is.
|
|
|
