Advertisement
 
Post Reply
Page 1 of 8  •  1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 8 Next
Water Gaps help prove Noah's Flood occurred.
5 months ago  ::  Jan 02, 2012 - 7:39AM #71
Blü
Posts: 17,544

57


Anyway, thanks for making it perfectly clear that no Genesis flood ever occurred and that water gaps don't even to the slightest degree suggest otherwise.

Quick Reply
Cancel
5 months ago  ::  Jan 01, 2012 - 11:00PM #70
d_p_m
Posts: 5,006

Jan 1, 2012 -- 1:22PM, 57 wrote:


Jan 1, 2012 -- 11:01AM, amcolph wrote:


Jan 1, 2012 -- 9:57AM, 57 wrote:


Dec 31, 2011 -- 8:28PM, amcolph wrote:


Dec 31, 2011 -- 4:41PM, 57 wrote:


You're right MMarcoe..there are no scholars that believe that...wink , wink.




Of course there are none.  If there were any, you would not hesitate to name them,




Kinda like you posting on how mutations add up.




Which we do--with references you can check.


But somehow the "Bible scholars" you allude to never seem to have names.


Just like the "evo books" you build your straw men on don't have names either.




Yeah, like a 16% beneficial mutation rate. LOL.




You can't laugh away reality, 57.


"beneficial mutations were clearly evident. In fact, the fraction of mutations inferred to be beneficial was substantial—16%."


- quoted from abstract of:


Heredity (2007) 99, 359–360; doi:10.1038/sj.hdy.6801042; published online 1 August 2007


Mutation rates: When the going gets tough, beneficial mutations get going


A Betancourt1


1Institute for Evolutionary Biology, King's Buildings, W Mains Rd, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH9 3JT, UK


-- www.nature.com/hdy/journal/v99/n4/full/6...


-- www.nature.com/hdy/journal/v99/n4/pdf/68...




"I am the soul of nature that gives life to the universe."

-- The Charge of the Goddess
Quick Reply
Cancel
5 months ago  ::  Jan 01, 2012 - 2:30PM #69
amcolph
Posts: 10,423

Jan 1, 2012 -- 1:53PM, 57 wrote:


Here


Here


here


here


Here


Here



How many do you need?




So, basically all you have is a controversial minority translation of a line in a hymn, Psalm 104:8--not a part of the Bible that even you can pretend is supposed to be historical.


See, was that so hard?

This post contains no advertisements or solicitations.
Quick Reply
Cancel
5 months ago  ::  Jan 01, 2012 - 2:09PM #68
rsielin
Posts: 1,689

Jan 1, 2012 -- 1:53PM, 57 wrote:


How many do you need?



We need much more precision than this example of your standard handwaving.


Please highlight those passages where your uncredentialed scholars describe with supporting empirical evidence, not just a story, of how the "valleys sank ... and the mountains rose" after the flood and how Noah and family survived the searing heat that your story process generated.


You understand, without supporting empirical evidence all you've got is just another story, fairy tale story at that.


Thank you.

Quick Reply
Cancel
5 months ago  ::  Jan 01, 2012 - 2:08PM #67
Ken
Posts: 30,467

Jan 1, 2012 -- 1:53PM, 57 wrote:


Here


Here


here


here


Here


Here



How many do you need?



The request was for scholars. Creationists don't count.

Quick Reply
Cancel
5 months ago  ::  Jan 01, 2012 - 1:53PM #66
57
Posts: 12,184

Here


Here


here


here


Here


Here



How many do you need?

Quick Reply
Cancel
5 months ago  ::  Jan 01, 2012 - 1:22PM #65
57
Posts: 12,184

Jan 1, 2012 -- 11:01AM, amcolph wrote:


Jan 1, 2012 -- 9:57AM, 57 wrote:


Dec 31, 2011 -- 8:28PM, amcolph wrote:


Dec 31, 2011 -- 4:41PM, 57 wrote:


You're right MMarcoe..there are no scholars that believe that...wink , wink.




Of course there are none.  If there were any, you would not hesitate to name them,




Kinda like you posting on how mutations add up.




Which we do--with references you can check.


But somehow the "Bible scholars" you allude to never seem to have names.


Just like the "evo books" you build your straw men on don't have names either.







Yeah, like a 16% beneficial mutation rate. LOL.

Quick Reply
Cancel
5 months ago  ::  Jan 01, 2012 - 1:08PM #64
MMarcoe
Posts: 8,414

Jan 1, 2012 -- 9:57AM, 57 wrote:


Dec 31, 2011 -- 8:28PM, amcolph wrote:


Dec 31, 2011 -- 4:41PM, 57 wrote:


You're right MMarcoe..there are no scholars that believe that...wink , wink.




Of course there are none.  If there were any, you would not hesitate to name them,




Kinda like you posting on how mutations add up.





You need a New Year's resolution to name these people; to provide the Bible quotes that you claim exist; and, when you don't know something, to just admit it.


 

There are three sides to every story: your side, my side, and the truth.
Quick Reply
Cancel
5 months ago  ::  Jan 01, 2012 - 11:01AM #63
amcolph
Posts: 10,423

Jan 1, 2012 -- 9:57AM, 57 wrote:


Dec 31, 2011 -- 8:28PM, amcolph wrote:


Dec 31, 2011 -- 4:41PM, 57 wrote:


You're right MMarcoe..there are no scholars that believe that...wink , wink.




Of course there are none.  If there were any, you would not hesitate to name them,




Kinda like you posting on how mutations add up.




Which we do--with references you can check.


But somehow the "Bible scholars" you allude to never seem to have names.


Just like the "evo books" you build your straw men on don't have names either.




This post contains no advertisements or solicitations.
Quick Reply
Cancel
5 months ago  ::  Jan 01, 2012 - 9:57AM #62
57
Posts: 12,184

Dec 31, 2011 -- 8:28PM, amcolph wrote:


Dec 31, 2011 -- 4:41PM, 57 wrote:


You're right MMarcoe..there are no scholars that believe that...wink , wink.




Of course there are none.  If there were any, you would not hesitate to name them,




Kinda like you posting on how mutations add up.

Quick Reply
Cancel
Page 1 of 8  •  1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 8 Next
Post Reply
 
    Viewing this thread :: 0 registered and 1 guest
    No registered users viewing
    Advertisement

    Beliefnet On Facebook