Oct 18, 2011 -- 10:20PM, Sigmund wrote:

Oct 18, 2011 -- 9:19PM, hamerhas wrote:

The greatest variance  you can produce between the reigns of two successive of kings in the

entire English history is 11 years.

11 paltry years being the largest variance you can produce in the entire English history. 

11 years varience being the greatest single anomaly in the entire history.

First off, I snipped the rest of your post for brevity and the fact that it makes no sense. I will address the rest of this however.

Apparently you're having a little difficulty following the math here. There are SEVERAL instances where an long Monarch Reign is followed by an extremely short one:

 

Æthelwulf     839 - 858     19 years succeeded by:

Æthelbald     858 - 860     2 years (17 year difference, more than 11 right?)

 

Æthelred the Unready     978 - 1013     35 years succeeded by:

Sweyn I Forkbeard     1013 - 1014     2 years max (33 year difference, more than 11 right?)

 

Henry VI     1422 - 1461     39 years succeeded by:

Edward IV     1461 - 1470     9 years (30 year difference, more than 11 right?)

 

Henry VIII     1509 - 1547     38 years succeeded by:

Edwards VI     1547 - 1553     6 years (32 year difference, more than 11 right?)

 

Now then, how about you actually give us a date or reigning Pharoh during or before this supposed Egyptian "implosion"

That was my fault . in the interest of "brevity" I was just scanning the one column.

11 or 33 vs 80+ does not make a significant difference when taking into account the fact that

you have to comprehensively throw in the entire English dynasty to come up with 33 year

variance

                                      vs

 the biblical detailing of the reigns of just TWO specific Pharaohs with such a great variance in reigns 80+ , COMPOUNDED with having it

to line up with all the other associated & incidentally given information and have not one  detail

contradicting another in the bible, and even more importantly not contradicting the secular

record.

It really is comparing apples to ocelots when you consider the compounded probability .

If the pharaoh in question had lived 43 yrs , 57 yrs , 29 yrs , 61 yrs, etc,etc,,,,,,,,,,,.

the secularly established evidence would have been trumpheted long ago and you would be

explaining that fact to me right now.

But you aren't are you?

And you are by no means the lone ranger in this regard.

That is because the secular record of egyptology tells us something nobody seems to want to

talk about concerning the LAST TWO pharaohs of Egypt.

Oct 18, 2011 -- 11:38PM, hamerhas wrote:

That is because the secular record of egyptology tells us something nobody seems to want to

talk about concerning the LAST TWO pharaohs of Egypt.  

??????

The last two Pharaohs of Egypt:

• Ptolemy XII Neos Dionysos (Auletes)  (80 BC-58 BC, 55  BC-51 BC) with co-regents Cleopatra V Tryphaena  (58 BC-57 BC) and Berenice IV Cleopatra Epiphaneia (58 BC-55 BC)

• Cleopatra VII Thea Neotera  (51 BC-30 BC) ruled jointly with Ptolemy XIII (51 BC-47  BC) Ptolemy XIV (47 BC-44 BC)  and Ptolemy XV Caesarean (44 BC-30 BC).

So what's the big secret about them that you know and we don't?

Oct 19, 2011 -- 5:40AM, hamerhas wrote:

 

 My you have sure become coy.

You sure you don't want to claim "tabloid" info as my source concerning Egypt's last two

Pharaohs on this thread ?

I wish you would?

Must be the smarting from the last spanking given you in your last claim of "tabloid" sources

is just a little to painful at this point? 

Do you have any info to back up your claims?  

Oct 19, 2011 -- 5:40AM, hamerhas wrote:

Oct 18, 2011 -- 11:52PM, d_p_m wrote:

Oct 18, 2011 -- 11:38PM, hamerhas wrote:

 the biblical detailing of the reigns of just TWO specific Pharaohs with such a great variance in reigns 80+ , COMPOUNDED with having it

to line up with all the other associated & incidentally given information and have not one  detail

contradicting another in the bible, and even more importantly not contradicting the secular

record.

So, name and date these "TWO specific Pharaohs" you are going on about, and show how they fit in the secular records. Please cite mainsteam Egyptological sources for your dates.

 

 My you have sure become coy.

You sure you don't want to claim "tabloid" info as my source concerning Egypt's last two

Pharaohs on this thread ?

I wish you would?

Must be the smarting from the last spanking given you in your last claim of "tabloid" sources

is just a little to painful at this point? 

I see you still don't seem to be able to name the Pharaohs you are making claims about. Problem finding them? I thought it was 'easy'?

So, secular Egyptology sources - who are these pharaohs you keep claiming exist, but never produce? And what are the dates of their reigns?