Ah, misogyny raised to the level of theology and pronounced good. 

Now THERE'S an enlightened view for you.  (note sarcasm, kthxbai)

Feb 2, 2010 -- 11:55PM, 2bme wrote:

Bigotted ignoramus??  What did I tell ya; just like a woman. 

Women lie, cheat, steal, nag, become jealous, moody, and a host of other traits.  If it wasn't for compensating with other delightful tendencies, Adam would have to tell God to take back the helper and give me back my rib.

At the risk of getting myself admonished by the admin guy, I have to say you're a real a**hole. Maybe you should find a nice woman with the "delightful tendencies" and proceed to address your deep, inner hurt.

Feb 4, 2010 -- 12:31PM, 2bme wrote:

I've been posting politically incorrect stereotyping. 

No kidding.  

To express what women do is only possible for an a-hole but complaining about what Christians do is the rage of the day for the sophisticated.  Here for example is a thread from the Christianity discussion board:

Why Are So Many Christians So Hateful?

You can find all sorts of threads on these boards. Big deal.

2bme

ID is now politically incorrect so the sophisticated seek to get their rocks off stereotyping and acting superior as though they understand something.

ID isn't politically incorrect.

It's just fatheaded.

Feb 4, 2010 -- 6:42PM, McAtheist wrote:

2beme: Asking why women are hateful attracts scorn while asking why Christians are hateful attracts sympathy.  ID is now politically incorrect so the sophisticated seek to get their rocks off stereotyping and acting superior as though they understand something.

Really?  Don't all Christians, Jews, Muslims, Hindus and pagans basically believe in a form of Intelligent Design?  That would mean that the VAST majority of people in the US believe in ID amd that it is a very standard, politically correct religious position to hold.

Corrections are in order, I think. The ID that these folks believe in is not necessarily or usually the same as the ID that's currently snaking its way around the US and its court system.

What I think you are actually whining about is that ID is not accepted as a valid SCIENTIFIC position to hold.  The reason for that is that ID proponents have failed to successfully move this religious idea into the scientific arena; even Michael Behe admitted that currently, the only definition of science into which ID fits would also accept astrology as science. 

Behe's ID is not the same ID as that of many religious believers. If the scientific objections to this version of ID were thoroughly explained to believers and they rejected it, they would still believe in ID per se, but not Behe's.

So, the problem isn't with the "sophisticated" deciding that ID is politically incorrect --- the problem is that the ID proponents haven't done their homework yet.

(And by the way, if you ask why women are hateful in a roomful of men, I bet you get a pretty synpathetic response, just like you would get a sympathetic response to ID in a church group.)