Post Reply
Page 3 of 14  •  Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 14 Next
2 years ago  ::  Nov 09, 2011 - 12:44PM #21
DotNotInOz
Posts: 5,616

Nov 9, 2011 -- 11:37AM, TemplarS wrote:


Attempts such as that in the Mississippi referedum are intended to take the question back to early term abortions. One would think that such attempts under standing law from Roe onward would be doomed to constitutional rejection.  But, of course, pro-life people are looking to instigate something which would give the current court the opportunity to reverse Roe altogether.  I do not think this will happen, but of course it is possible.


More to the point, from polls I have seen the vast majority of Americans are satisfied that current law represents a reasonable and prudent compromise given the quite irreconcileable differences at play.  In things like yesterday's vote, there is no indication that social conservatives are gaining power; quite the opposite (I think), since age demographics are increasingly against them.



I think you're quite correct, Templar. Well stated.


I'd add that I'm not so sure that age demographics have turned the tables as much as the increasing numbers of people who simply think for themselves and disregard what their religion teaches when those teachings don't seem reasonable or humane.  

Quick Reply
Cancel
2 years ago  ::  Nov 09, 2011 - 12:45PM #22
mainecaptain
Posts: 20,505

Nov 9, 2011 -- 11:54AM, rocketjsquirell wrote:


Nov 9, 2011 -- 12:23AM, CharikIeia wrote:


Nov 8, 2011 -- 11:12PM, jane2 wrote:


The so-called "personhood" initiative was rejected ...



Personhood... isn't that what corporations have?


Maybe it's time for another ballot...




Chari


You seem to have forgotten that the same people who believe that corporations are persons also believe that women are not.  


The Mississippi vote is just one small baby step on the way to establishing, once again, that women are persons and corporations are not.  



Rocket, that was great.

A tyrant must put on the appearance of uncommon devotion to religion. Subjects are less apprehensive of illegal treatment from a ruler whom they consider god-fearing and pious. On the other hand, they do less easily move against him, believing that he has the gods on his side. Aristotle
Never discourage anyone...who continually makes progress, no matter how slow. Plato..
"A life is not important except in the impact it has on other lives" Jackie Robinson
Quick Reply
Cancel
2 years ago  ::  Nov 09, 2011 - 1:18PM #23
Wanderingal
Posts: 5,504

Nov 9, 2011 -- 11:58AM, mainecaptain wrote:


Nov 9, 2011 -- 12:56AM, Wanderingal wrote:


Nov 9, 2011 -- 12:14AM, mainecaptain wrote:


Nov 8, 2011 -- 11:51PM, Wanderingal wrote:


Of course that "personhood" initiative was rejected. It was stupid.


And ANTI-Women.


 




Not so much of course my friend, But thankfully it was rejected.


Remember there are an awful lot of anti women people out there, as well as .....well....you know ;)




MaineC--hi.


You know--it would scare me to think that anyone woukd elevate a single cell into importance above that of a living fully-functioning adult woman--


--except that I was raised as a very traditional Catholic and we were taught that even if the mother was dying and only an  abortion would save her--"God wanted BOTH the mother and the fetus to die."


I never bought that but hearing it over and over again--how it devalued women--was pretty horrifying--especially when the priests saying it had that glint of fanaticsm in their eyes as they talked about the death of the mother and the fetus.


Just the way the supporters of this initiative do.


Anti-women fanaticsm is an ugly ugly thing to behold.




Yes I know, I too was raised in a Catholic household. And as is being discussed on another thread Christianity is a death cult, revering death above life, except of course for anything not born .


This is why we need a strong separation between church and state. A death cult should not be mixed into government and laws.


No offence intended my friend.




MaineC--hi.


Definitely none taken.


As I read the posts on this thread and as I listened to the propaganda in favor of that bill I was also reminded of the many Catholic women I knew who did follow the traditional Catholic ideas foisted on them from early childhood.


Their adherence to the misogynistic ideals of the church hierarchy resulted in their endured much much suffering--a lot of it physical from the effects of childbearing when their bodies could not take the strain.


And emotional as their lives and adult relationships were overtaken by burdensome childrearing of many more children than they could possibly take care of.


I have some more thoughts on this--will list them later.


BTW--no one who was raised the way we were could say anything that would offend me on this topic.



 

Quick Reply
Cancel
2 years ago  ::  Nov 09, 2011 - 1:23PM #24
Wanderingal
Posts: 5,504

Nov 9, 2011 -- 12:44PM, DotNotInOz wrote:


Nov 9, 2011 -- 11:37AM, TemplarS wrote:


Attempts such as that in the Mississippi referedum are intended to take the question back to early term abortions. One would think that such attempts under standing law from Roe onward would be doomed to constitutional rejection.  But, of course, pro-life people are looking to instigate something which would give the current court the opportunity to reverse Roe altogether.  I do not think this will happen, but of course it is possible.


More to the point, from polls I have seen the vast majority of Americans are satisfied that current law represents a reasonable and prudent compromise given the quite irreconcileable differences at play.  In things like yesterday's vote, there is no indication that social conservatives are gaining power; quite the opposite (I think), since age demographics are increasingly against them.



I think you're quite correct, Templar. Well stated.


I'd add that I'm not so sure that age demographics have turned the tables as much as the increasing numbers of people who simply think for themselves and disregard what their religion teaches when those teachings don't seem reasonable or humane.  




Dot--hi. I agree with you about Templar's post.


And I agree--from my own observations as well--that more people are thinking for themselves rather than taking the word of priests/ministers/preachers who try to tell women that our bodies are "dirty" in a moral sense and that "All we're good for is bearing children" and that "We're all daughters of sinful Eve" etc.


More people have figured out that women are people too. And that we have rights equal to the rights men have enjoyed for some time.


Tha's certainly what the results in Miss seem to indicate.



 

Quick Reply
Cancel
2 years ago  ::  Nov 09, 2011 - 1:40PM #25
Ebon
Posts: 7,696

Thank the deity of your choice for that. I've seen some badly written laws in my time but that one was ridiculous.

He who oppresses the poor shows contempt for their Maker, but whoever is kind to the needy honors God. ~ Proverbs 14:31

Fiat justitia, ruat caelum

Quick Reply
Cancel
2 years ago  ::  Nov 09, 2011 - 1:45PM #26
TemplarS
Posts: 5,177

Nov 9, 2011 -- 12:40PM, Girlchristian wrote:


I don't think social conservatives are gaining ground, but several polls have indicated that even the younger generation is starting to see abortion differently and full support for elective abortion is waning.





I think that needs to be taken a bit further.


I will agree that many in the younger generation are continuing to view abortion unfavorably.  In point of fact my two daughters, now in college, are part of this number.


But as I see it, (and as I look at what my daughters think) this does not mean they support increasing legal restrictions on abortion, nor turning the clock back on Roe.


What it does mean is that they, personally, are less willing to consider abortion as an ethical option for themselves.


But that, really, is a choice, is it not?

Quick Reply
Cancel
2 years ago  ::  Nov 09, 2011 - 1:52PM #27
mountain_man
Posts: 34,170

Nov 9, 2011 -- 10:57AM, Bezant wrote:

That doesn't make sense. This is a definition for citizenship.


You asked a question, I answered it. If you don't want an answer, don't ask the question.


The point you purposely avoided is that the Constitution applies to citizens BORN or naturalized in this country.

Dave - Just a Man in the Mountains.

I am a Humanist. I believe in a rational philosophy of life, informed by science, inspired by art, and motivated by a desire to do good for its own sake and not by an expectation of a reward or fear of punishment in an afterlife.
Quick Reply
Cancel
2 years ago  ::  Nov 09, 2011 - 1:56PM #28
mountain_man
Posts: 34,170

Nov 9, 2011 -- 11:58AM, mainecaptain wrote:

Yes I know, I too was raised in a Catholic household. And as is being discussed on another thread Christianity is a death cult, revering death above life, except of course for anything not born .


This is why we need a strong separation between church and state. A death cult should not be mixed into government and laws.


No offense intended my friend.


For many it seems life begins at conception and ends at birth. The great thing about all this is that if you don't like abortion; you don't have to have one. This is an area where everyone should mind their own business.

Dave - Just a Man in the Mountains.

I am a Humanist. I believe in a rational philosophy of life, informed by science, inspired by art, and motivated by a desire to do good for its own sake and not by an expectation of a reward or fear of punishment in an afterlife.
Quick Reply
Cancel
2 years ago  ::  Nov 09, 2011 - 2:03PM #29
mainecaptain
Posts: 20,505

Nov 9, 2011 -- 1:56PM, mountain_man wrote:


Nov 9, 2011 -- 11:58AM, mainecaptain wrote:

Yes I know, I too was raised in a Catholic household. And as is being discussed on another thread Christianity is a death cult, revering death above life, except of course for anything not born .


This is why we need a strong separation between church and state. A death cult should not be mixed into government and laws.


No offense intended my friend.


For many it seems life begins at conception and ends at birth. The great thing about all this is that if you don't like abortion; you don't have to have one. This is an area where everyone should mind their own business.




Could not agree with you more.

A tyrant must put on the appearance of uncommon devotion to religion. Subjects are less apprehensive of illegal treatment from a ruler whom they consider god-fearing and pious. On the other hand, they do less easily move against him, believing that he has the gods on his side. Aristotle
Never discourage anyone...who continually makes progress, no matter how slow. Plato..
"A life is not important except in the impact it has on other lives" Jackie Robinson
Quick Reply
Cancel
2 years ago  ::  Nov 09, 2011 - 2:09PM #30
Wanderingal
Posts: 5,504

Has anyone here ever seen that old movie "The Cardinal"?


There's a scene in it that is burned into my memory ever since I first saw it as a child--a young Catholic woman is allowed to die because even though she could be saved by a therapeutic abortion her very devout family won't allow the abortion to be performed.


It's quite awful without being the least bit graphic--but I think that was when the nickel dropped for me about what the church actually thought about women as individual and valued human beings.


The first time I heard about this Miss. initiative that scene came immediately to mind....

Quick Reply
Cancel
Page 3 of 14  •  Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 14 Next
 
    Viewing this thread :: 0 registered and 1 guest
    No registered users viewing
    Advertisement

    Beliefnet On Facebook