Post Reply
Page 7 of 12  •  Prev 1 ... 5 6 7 8 9 ... 12 Next
Switch to Forum Live View Some We Love, Some We Hate, Some We Eat
3 years ago  ::  Oct 27, 2010 - 6:33AM #61
appy20
Posts: 10,165

Oct 26, 2010 -- 7:46PM, mytmouse57 wrote:


I once saw a dog get a slight hurt to his leg, yipe, limp a little bit and consequenlty get all sorts of attention from the people present.


Later, the dog made another pass, still limping, and obviously waiting for the attention. The problem was, he was limping on the wrong leg.


 




Years ago, at a stable where I boarded my horse, late at night when it was dark (no lights in parking lot) I closed my hatchback without knowing one of the stray stable cats was on top of the car.  I pinched her pad.  She ran off.  The next day I found her and she was limping and I took her to the vet.  Her leg was not broken, it had a cut pad.  She was put on antibiotics and I had her spayed and given vaccinations.  I kept her at my house until she healed.  I took her back to the barn. 


The next day I saw her and she was limping. I commented to other boarders that she needed to go back to the vet.  The boarders were mystified because she had not limped all day.  I took her back to the vet and he said she was fine.  The next day when I arrived, she limped out to greet me.  Once again, the other boarders said she wasn't limping all day.


I was working on my horse and walked around the barn and she was surprised by my sudden appearance.  She began limping.  On the wrong leg.


So, I began to spy on her.  As long as she didn't see me, she would not limp.  As soon as I appeared, she would limp.  Occasionally on the right leg and occasionally on the wrong one.  LOL


 

Quick Reply
Cancel
3 years ago  ::  Oct 27, 2010 - 12:22PM #62
allthegoodnamesweretaken
Posts: 11,634

Oct 26, 2010 -- 10:49PM, solfeggio wrote:


What Iwantamotto and Mouse are saying, then, is that they agree that nonhuman animals do have thought processes and reasoning powers.  And we all know that they feel pain, experience pleasure, and enjoy their food.


In other words,like humans, they are sentient beings. 


Let's see now: Alive, thinking, and feeling.  (So, where do these religious types come off describing them as 'dumb beasts,' then?)


And where does anybody get off thinking that they are just there for us to use and exploit?


Nonhumans aren't ours to use or kill for pleasure anymore than humans are there for us to enslave or torture or kill.


 




 


I don't think anyone is saying that they kill for pleasure, Solf.  I kill for food.  I take pleasure from food.  Sometimes a nice, rare, grilled steak can be damn near orgasmic, but killing is just a means to an end. 


 


So why put non-humans up on a pedistal that we don't put humans on?


 


all

Yesterday, in America, 100 million gun owners did nothing.
Quick Reply
Cancel
3 years ago  ::  Oct 27, 2010 - 12:41PM #63
mytmouse57
Posts: 9,316

Oct 27, 2010 -- 6:33AM, appy20 wrote:


Oct 26, 2010 -- 7:46PM, mytmouse57 wrote:


I once saw a dog get a slight hurt to his leg, yipe, limp a little bit and consequenlty get all sorts of attention from the people present.


Later, the dog made another pass, still limping, and obviously waiting for the attention. The problem was, he was limping on the wrong leg.


 




Years ago, at a stable where I boarded my horse, late at night when it was dark (no lights in parking lot) I closed my hatchback without knowing one of the stray stable cats was on top of the car.  I pinched her pad.  She ran off.  The next day I found her and she was limping and I took her to the vet.  Her leg was not broken, it had a cut pad.  She was put on antibiotics and I had her spayed and given vaccinations.  I kept her at my house until she healed.  I took her back to the barn. 


The next day I saw her and she was limping. I commented to other boarders that she needed to go back to the vet.  The boarders were mystified because she had not limped all day.  I took her back to the vet and he said she was fine.  The next day when I arrived, she limped out to greet me.  Once again, the other boarders said she wasn't limping all day.


I was working on my horse and walked around the barn and she was surprised by my sudden appearance.  She began limping.  On the wrong leg.


So, I began to spy on her.  As long as she didn't see me, she would not limp.  As soon as I appeared, she would limp.  Occasionally on the right leg and occasionally on the wrong one.  LOL


 





There's no doubt, animals are far more complex and intelligent than many people give them credit for. And the results can sometimes be comical.

Quick Reply
Cancel
3 years ago  ::  Oct 27, 2010 - 12:46PM #64
mytmouse57
Posts: 9,316

Oct 27, 2010 -- 12:22PM, allthegoodnamesweretaken wrote:


Oct 26, 2010 -- 10:49PM, solfeggio wrote:


What Iwantamotto and Mouse are saying, then, is that they agree that nonhuman animals do have thought processes and reasoning powers.  And we all know that they feel pain, experience pleasure, and enjoy their food.


In other words,like humans, they are sentient beings. 


Let's see now: Alive, thinking, and feeling.  (So, where do these religious types come off describing them as 'dumb beasts,' then?)


And where does anybody get off thinking that they are just there for us to use and exploit?


Nonhumans aren't ours to use or kill for pleasure anymore than humans are there for us to enslave or torture or kill.


 




 


I don't think anyone is saying that they kill for pleasure, Solf.  I kill for food.  I take pleasure from food.  Sometimes a nice, rare, grilled steak can be damn near orgasmic, but killing is just a means to an end. 


 


So why put non-humans up on a pedistal that we don't put humans on?


 


all





On the subject of hunting, I won't be politcally correct and try to deny that the kill isn't a thrilling moment. Any predator, be it human, wolf, bear, big cat -- whatever obviously takes satisfaction in the kill. But it's not some sort of quasi-orgasmic getting off that some try to make it out to be.  


Plus, it's only a moment. A moment that results from a lot of hard work, and consequently results in even more hard work -- from breaking the carcass down in the field, to getting it back home and then butchering and wrapping it for the freezer once it's there.


If I just wanted the cheap thrill of killing, I could grab my .22 and go shoot rats at the dump.

Quick Reply
Cancel
3 years ago  ::  Oct 27, 2010 - 1:18PM #65
allthegoodnamesweretaken
Posts: 11,634

Oct 27, 2010 -- 12:46PM, mytmouse57 wrote:


On the subject of hunting, I won't be politcally correct and try to deny that the kill isn't a thrilling moment. Any predator, be it human, wolf, bear, big cat -- whatever obviously takes satisfaction in the kill. But it's not some sort of quasi-orgasmic getting off that some try to make it out to be.  


Plus, it's only a moment. A moment that results from a lot of hard work, and consequently results in even more hard work -- from breaking the carcass down in the field, to getting it back home and then butchering and wrapping it for the freezer once it's there.


If I just wanted the cheap thrill of killing, I could grab my .22 and go shoot rats at the dump.




 


Not to mention killing rats at the dump would be a whole lot easier. 


 


I don't think there is an understanding of actually how hard hunting can be with some people. 


 


Rabbit and squirell are fairly easy, honestly.  Go to an area that is populated, and knock yourself out.  Quail and pheasant are hit or miss, even if you have a good dog. 


 


First time I went deer hunting though, I was impressed by how hard it is.  All the variables that one has to take into account.  It's not like they just walk up and say shoot me. 


 


I think the satisfaction comes from the effort that you have to put into it, not necessarily the kill itself. 


 


all

Yesterday, in America, 100 million gun owners did nothing.
Quick Reply
Cancel
3 years ago  ::  Oct 27, 2010 - 4:41PM #66
solfeggio
Posts: 7,743

I can't talk about hunting with anybody anymore.  The idea of getting pleasure out of taking a life is not just morally objectionable but revolting as well.


Mouse -


I wish I had a dollar for every time we've gone back and forth on the topic of humans vs nonhumans over the last three or four (five?) years.  I wouldn't be rich, but I'd have enough to buy a couple of bags of groceries.


At any rate, what it all boils down to in the end is that you're a religious man who, like just about everybody else on earth (and for some totally unexplainable reasons,) really does believe that biblical stuff about humans having 'dominion' over the 'beasts.'   And, because most humans subscribe to this idea, it gives humans an 'out' when they treat other animals as commodities to be exploited.


Given that we are all animals, evolved from the same common ancestor, and all contain some of the same DNA, it is illogical to assume that any one species is 'superior' to any other.  But, where religion is concerned, logic goes out the window.


As far as I'm concerned, we're all equal under the sun, no one species is superior to any other, and if the holy books say otherwise they're wrong.  God/s and religion are just human inventions, after all, and as fallible as any other human inventions. 


The fact that humans 'love' some animals and make them pets; hate others (like sharks and alligators) because they perceive them as dangerous; and eat others just shows how fickle and illogical are humans as a species.   And humans are not just illogical but hypocritical as well.  People who would never dream of mistreating their dog have no problem at all buying meat at the supermarket that came from factory farms where the animals are most assuredly terribly mistreated.


And that's just one of the many reasons why, generally speaking, I'll take animals over humans any day.  Whatever their faults, at least they're not hyprocrites.


 


 


 

Quick Reply
Cancel
3 years ago  ::  Oct 27, 2010 - 5:04PM #67
allthegoodnamesweretaken
Posts: 11,634

Oct 27, 2010 -- 4:41PM, solfeggio wrote:


I can't talk about hunting with anybody anymore.  The idea of getting pleasure out of taking a life is not just morally objectionable but revolting as well.



 


 


Well that explains why you don't listen when we say that we don't take pleasure from the killing. 


all



Yesterday, in America, 100 million gun owners did nothing.
Quick Reply
Cancel
3 years ago  ::  Oct 27, 2010 - 5:31PM #68
solfeggio
Posts: 7,743

And, as I've said a thousand times, I do not understand why anybody would do something on purpose, over and over again, in which he took no pleasure. 


It's not logical.


I don't know about you, but I try to avoid doing that which does not give me pleasure.

Quick Reply
Cancel
3 years ago  ::  Oct 27, 2010 - 6:00PM #69
allthegoodnamesweretaken
Posts: 11,634

Oct 27, 2010 -- 5:31PM, solfeggio wrote:


And, as I've said a thousand times, I do not understand why anybody would do something on purpose, over and over again, in which he took no pleasure.



 


Because he (or she) takes pleasure in things surrounding it. 


 


He takes pleasure in the solitude.  In the crisp morning air.  In watching the sun rise.  In feeling a bonding with the countless members of humanity that has done the same thing.  In sitting down to a nice steak. 


 


I know you can get all of these things individually without hunting, but you can only get all of them together by hunting. 


all



Yesterday, in America, 100 million gun owners did nothing.
Quick Reply
Cancel
3 years ago  ::  Oct 27, 2010 - 6:18PM #70
Marcion
Posts: 2,883

I grew up in NE Pennsylvania where getting your first buck was a rite of passage.


That was then, I haven't hunted since I was 18. I put my guns away and swore never to kill another animal - criminals are a different story.

Quick Reply
Cancel
Page 7 of 12  •  Prev 1 ... 5 6 7 8 9 ... 12 Next
 
    Viewing this thread :: 0 registered and 1 guest
    No registered users viewing
    Advertisement

    Beliefnet On Facebook